Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful
HopeNotTake t1_jc50kfx wrote
I'm kinda similar in weight but 9 cm taller, I've dabbled in low BMI levels
Dick_Cottonfan t1_jc507v5 wrote
Reply to comment by rabbiskittles in [OC] There are a few other Banks sitting on large unrealized securities losses. Compared that to their stock price return month-to-date to see what the rest of the market thinks of their situation. by Square_Tea4916
OH MY GOD, YOU SHORT-SOLD KENNY!!!
ktxhopem3276 t1_jc502dh wrote
Reply to comment by TracyMorganFreeman in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
Earned income tax credit offsets that issue. Or are you making an argument to replace the flat payroll tax with a progressive tax ?
ktxhopem3276 t1_jc4zvsa wrote
Reply to comment by TracyMorganFreeman in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
Obviously it was a joke. But not all bribes are in the form of campaign funds. Other bribes are the paid speeches and future employment offers
TracyMorganFreeman t1_jc4zhq8 wrote
Reply to comment by ktxhopem3276 in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
Hmm, maybe forcing people to pay into a system they might not survive to benefit from was a bad idea.
ktxhopem3276 t1_jc4z44a wrote
Reply to comment by TracyMorganFreeman in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
Depends on life expectancy gender and spousal benefit
>The result in this study implies that the differential mortality between low earners and high earners reduce the progressivity of Social Security. Estimates show that, under current Social Security, the IRR (i.e., the rate of return of lifetime payroll taxes) for the 1930 cohort in the bottom income quintile is 1.67% compared with 2.28% for those in the top income quintile. This difference in IRR is widened for the 1960 cohort due to larger mortality differences—0.6% for the bottom income quintile compared with 2.46% for the top income quintile.
TracyMorganFreeman t1_jc4yzhd wrote
Reply to comment by ktxhopem3276 in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
The fact you don't pay payroll taxes on something that isn't payroll is the point.
DD_equals_doodoo t1_jc4yv26 wrote
Reply to comment by Square_Manufacturer2 in [OC] There are a few other Banks sitting on large unrealized securities losses. Compared that to their stock price return month-to-date to see what the rest of the market thinks of their situation. by Square_Tea4916
The y-axis is kinda useless for inference because of endogeneity.
ktxhopem3276 t1_jc4yl9g wrote
Reply to comment by TracyMorganFreeman in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
unclegabriel t1_jc4y2s6 wrote
Reply to comment by thatdude333 in [OC] Ratio of Median Home Listing Price (Feb 2023) to Median Family Income (2022 Estimate) For 392 US Metropolitan Statistical Areas by thatdude333
It would be interesting to see this visualized on a map
ktxhopem3276 t1_jc4y0oo wrote
Reply to comment by TracyMorganFreeman in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
If the campaign funds improve their chances of winning election,they personally benefit
TracyMorganFreeman t1_jc4x2rm wrote
Reply to comment by MainStreetRoad in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
You seem to be confusing campaign funding with income.
send2devnull2 t1_jc4x0lq wrote
Reply to Walmart's customer demographics are changing rapidly. 28% of households earing $150k+ are Walmart+ members, up from 13% last year. by nassan
As someone who was once employed by those heartless bastards, I completely understand why people of modest means shop there, but why anyone who can afford to shop anywhere else doesn’t. They are awful for nearly every aspect of small town America, and they cost the taxpayers billions of dollars a year. They are one of the worst corporations ever, and should only be compared to a hybrid of a locust and a vampire squid on the face of humanity.
MainStreetRoad t1_jc4wjrm wrote
Reply to comment by TracyMorganFreeman in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
That’s a façade, congress makes MOST of their income via bribes.
Infinite_Carpenter t1_jc4v1gi wrote
Reply to [OC] There are a few other Banks sitting on large unrealized securities losses. Compared that to their stock price return month-to-date to see what the rest of the market thinks of their situation. by Square_Tea4916
Thank god the republicans got rid of Dodd-Frank (which was toothless anyway).
[deleted] t1_jc4rloq wrote
Reply to comment by Zenla in [OC] Results after a little over a month on Hinge (M/27) by elhospitaler
[removed]
Bells_Ringing t1_jc4p540 wrote
Reply to comment by ThePurpleDuckling in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
Depends on how you interpret the facts. If nothing changes, all SS beneficiaries receive a 20-30% reduction in benefits when the funds are depleted. What republicans say is that the cuts are coming. We can either plan for them or it’s an across the board cut.
Obviously for political reasons, that turns into pushing granny off a cliff
Ravingraven21 t1_jc4nfge wrote
Reply to Walmart's customer demographics are changing rapidly. 28% of households earing $150k+ are Walmart+ members, up from 13% last year. by nassan
Free for Amex Platinum. Suspect that’s a major driver.
Deepfriedwithcheese t1_jc4lb7x wrote
Reply to [OC] There are a few other Banks sitting on large unrealized securities losses. Compared that to their stock price return month-to-date to see what the rest of the market thinks of their situation. by Square_Tea4916
Loving my credit unions right about now.
cgsmith105 t1_jc4l6gh wrote
This is awesome! What's the hardest to improve?
__blackout t1_jc4ktsx wrote
Reply to Walmart's customer demographics are changing rapidly. 28% of households earing $150k+ are Walmart+ members, up from 13% last year. by nassan
Walmart+ appeals to people because they don’t have to go to Walmart and interact with the regulars
cX1s OP t1_jc4hvt5 wrote
Reply to comment by GaynessForever in My Weightlifting Journey over the past 6-7 months visualized! [OC] by cX1s
During my time training in high school, I was able to hit 195 for a single at my peak, at 5’10” and around 160 lbs. Starting back up was a little rough, I even struggled with 135 initially when I got back into it, but consistency and working on my form has done wonders.
GaynessForever t1_jc4hhnm wrote
Reply to comment by cX1s in My Weightlifting Journey over the past 6-7 months visualized! [OC] by cX1s
Good natural genetics if you're benching 225lbs at 18 with minimal training
cX1s OP t1_jc4h8ds wrote
Reply to comment by GaynessForever in My Weightlifting Journey over the past 6-7 months visualized! [OC] by cX1s
I trained for about a year and a half when I was around 15-16, then stopped through high school. I just started again the summer before uni, and have been tracking since then!
TracyMorganFreeman t1_jc50ty2 wrote
Reply to comment by ktxhopem3276 in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
Which you till pay taxes on.
This, combined with the numerous bureaucrats and tech professionals who are their donors is why that donut hole was selected.
Ultimately it's telling they don't just try to lift the cap entirely.