Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

thatdude333 OP t1_jbov8dl wrote

The Metropolitan Statistical Areas listed on the chart are the ones I could match up Median Home Prices from the National Association of Realtors and Per Capita Income from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis to calculate a ratio from. Out of 384 total Metropolitan Statistical Areas, this chart shows 182 of them.

1

ColonelStoic t1_jbon09x wrote

The surge of these graphs has been strange. As someone who is currently pursuing an engineering PhD, I can confidently say that a degree has nothing to do with intelligence. There is no correlation between higher education implying intelligence and the party you vote for.

Id argue that it most definitely depends on what you’re majoring in , and if the industry you work for requires higher education. I think it’s safe to say that most business/finance/economics departments consist of right-leaning males, as do agricultural departments. Most liberal arts, software engineering, and environment departments would consist of left leaning males and females.

These posts hide way too much of what really goes on.

Just to add, my engineering department consists of a very even split between left and right, although most of us just really don’t give a damn in general.

3

thatdude333 OP t1_jbohm0b wrote

Desirability is highly subjective.

I live in the Syracuse, NY MSA which has a pretty low ratio (3.4) and enjoy living here - Mild summers, actual winters (3 ski resorts close by), easy driving distance to the Adirondacks & Catskills, no traffic, all my friends are within an hour or so drive, $270k 2500sqft house on 3 acres 20 minutes from work.

From other threads on housing costs, I see tons of comments from Redditors that "can't live" in areas outside NYC, Boston, DC, Seattle, SF, LA, etc. because they value urban living the most.

To each their own, but my point is, different people value different things.

16

gc3c OP t1_jbof7hv wrote

Interesting thought. If you had more colleges per capita, would you necessarily have more professors per capita? Perhaps the count of colleges is not 1:1 with the count of professors (some colleges may be small).

I think that it is likely that there is an amplifying factor outside politics, which is that (in my estimation and experience) highly educated people are more likely to have advanced degrees. I know that sounds self-explanatory, but it's a compounding effect. For example, the more high school graduates you have, the more college graduates you have, and the more college graduates you have, the more advanced degrees you award.

So, having good basic education is going to lead to a higher number of advanced degrees awarded at the end of that cycle.

I think that rather than the "Democrat = Smart" story, this is telling a story of economic differences that goes back to the fundamental differences between the states. This is a story of rural vs urban. The more urban a state is, the more white collar jobs it has. And, it may be that the Democratic perspective resonates more with people in those jobs - that their policy ideas and values more align with urbanites.

I think if you were to do another graph with advanced degrees plotted against percent of population living in an urban environment, you'd find a strong correlation, and we may find that urban population is a better predictor of D-ticket votes than educational attainment.

Did a quick Google search and found this: https://engaging-data.com/election-population-density/

Being closely packed in with other people makes you far more likely to vote Democrat. (Unless you live in Staten Island, apparently. What a strange outlier. I don't know enough about NYC to explain this.)

1