Seeing this makes the great flood theories make sense. We are truly playing with fire with climate change… or with water…

That was Mark Viduka's 2002/03 season, he scored 7 goals over 4 games, including a hat-trick against Charlton Athletic.

I wanna know who's at the bottom, plateauing until around game 30 where they just go insane.

This is OC, though before I posted I searched the sub so thought I'd mention u/BoMcCready who seemed to have done a similar visualisation before me!

Tools: Python (pandas/seaborn)

Source: premierleague.com - scraped the data with Python

There were ads? I typically leave to get beer, food, toilet, etc

My point is still true, that profit is kept largely by management and stockholders. It's literally the definition of the word.

Nobody in management even owns 1/4 of 1 percent of shares. Not even the founder. Go read a book or something yeah.

THIS IS MY HOME

And really long

How are these visual maps made..?

That was Australia

That stockholders are a part of management, and my point still stands?

China's issue is more complex:

1. They're aging much faster than they're growing wealthy as a country
2. Their wealth inequality is vast. Japan is still in the top 15 for median household wealth (the US is 20 something by comparison)
3. A lot of the key metrics from China are opaque, smoothed, and questionable. Unemployment rates, for example are always 4-5% per government reports. Regardless of macroeconomic factors like recessions or economic booms. Those have multiple times been called out since they don't include rural or migrant workers, and some reports have suggested double-digit unemployment rates are common year to year.
4. China is still in the Middle Income Trap. The question is if enough of the wealthy urban coastal cities can generate enough to balance out the much more impoverished rural interior as a whole, and if they're willing to do so.
5. In contemporary history, the only countries to truly achieve high income status have done so with (relatively) liberal democracies, representative governments, and promoting progressive societal policies of various flavors. China is trying to break ground as a truly authoritarian police state wielding state capitalism strategically, and leveraging police/surveillance state technology to the fullest. To what outcomes very much remains to be seen. If they're successful, we may see far more iron-fisted style governments supported by, and emulating them. If they fail, it may be evidence that you can't turn a highly controlled society into a wealthy one, such as Singapore, at any real scale.

Why does this subreddit not enforce a standard of requiring all submissions to include a sufficient legend that describes all necessary aspects expressed in posted visualizations? I feel like this happens a lot, and I’d love for this community to moderate a higher standard of data practices.

So much like China or different?

I don't see why it matters so much. Are you an Antarctaphobe?

What's the data source?

Remember when the first comment below a viz was a link to the data source? The good ol' days...

[removed]

[removed]

3rd largest GDP in the world is one of the worst? Oof, I feel bad for everyone further down the list.

The article itself mentions it’s not a country and even if it says “total land mass” they could’ve put a footnote or an asterisk. Anyway, this is a silly thing to go back and forth about.

It does say "Earth's Total Surface Area", so omitting isn't an option. Also, Antarctica is the only large piece of land with no label on it, so it deserves its unique place

I feel like you could completely omit it and no one would be the wiser. Or put it in an “others” category seeing as how every country in the world isn’t listed.

Someone needs to forward this to J. Peterson.

It just displays the remaining part. You wouldn't want a blank space there, so just label it as it is