Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful
iiSpook t1_jb0kby6 wrote
Reply to comment by Nervous-Dark-4559 in [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
If you're going to be this pedantic you're going to have to find out how many of those "aviation" deaths weren't actively flying at the time as well. I think it's perfectly fine to categorize accidents with vehicles that were specifically meant to go to space as space-related accidents.
LazerWolfe53 t1_jb0kbaj wrote
Reply to comment by UndefinedSuperhero in [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
The elevator was already 1,676 meters deep when it fell 400m. Holy cow, that's a crazy tall elevator
SunnyDayInPoland t1_jb0jyzj wrote
Reply to comment by theD0UBLE in [OC] Wind Speed Vs Wind Power by Barra79
Yes, I think we're as likely going faster than the speed of light as we are beating the Betz limit
geek66 t1_jb0j5ut wrote
Reply to comment by mfb- in [OC] Wind Speed Vs Wind Power by Barra79
Exactly my point, so it dilutes the data, and gives misleading impression.
VelcroSea t1_jb0iat1 wrote
Reply to [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Unique display, good use of color and gradients. Communication very clear and intuitive.
Really got people discussing nuances right away which I think is a great measure of success.
Nicely done!
tremynci t1_jb0gj4d wrote
Reply to comment by denisrennes in [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Sorry, neighbor, I wasn't clear: the deadliest radiation disaster listed in the Wikipedia list OP used as a source is the 1957 Mayak storage tank explosion. Chernobyl is third on that list
Nervous-Dark-4559 t1_jb0gedy wrote
Reply to comment by PSMF_Canuck in [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
But on this argument, what about thoes hit by meteorites?
honestly, this should be in the "accident" category
Nervous-Dark-4559 t1_jb0g7jy wrote
Reply to [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Ohhh, wait a few more years until the glaciers melt.... even more...
tgiccuwaun t1_jb0g57d wrote
Reply to [OC] Wind Speed Vs Wind Power by Barra79
How would you normalize this to factor in demand? Lots of windy days where there is no demand and also windless days with high demand. Wind speed and peak demand aren't correlated.
PENNST8alum t1_jb0f2dw wrote
Reply to [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
You sure that aviation # is in the right category? Pretty sure >600 people were in planes just on 9/11
uchunokata t1_jb0ery4 wrote
Reply to [OC] Wind Speed Vs Wind Power by Barra79
The turbines are designed to handle specific wind speed ranges. So once you get outside the design envelope you are going to get little to no power generation.
the-software-man t1_jb0ed25 wrote
Reply to [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Noah’s flood killed everyone but a dozen people? Should be bigger?
Baracuda_15 t1_jb0e2py wrote
Reply to [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Would have been good to add War.
Kualityy t1_jb0d62m wrote
Reply to comment by RenegadeMoose in [OC] Wind Speed Vs Wind Power by Barra79
>or are all those low-density outliers above the red line causing it to appear higher up?
Pretty much this. Least squares regression is sensitive to outliers.
denisrennes t1_jb0d5ac wrote
Reply to comment by tremynci in [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Possible but difficult to say because the figures were hidden by the USSR at the time. However, some of the figures given for Chernobyl by some sources seem closer.
Piticolis t1_jb0bku9 wrote
Reply to [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Way more people died in aircraft crashes than 600 people. Is those data taken from where?
z-trans t1_jb0bhcd wrote
Reply to [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Cars are really something we need to phase out or limit usage of maximise on public-mass-transport+walk+mirco-mobility.
theD0UBLE t1_jb0aqob wrote
Reply to [OC] Wind Speed Vs Wind Power by Barra79
Is Betz limit still considered accurate? Cause the data looks to go with it.
snozzberrypatch t1_jb0an83 wrote
Reply to comment by okwaitno in [OC] Wikipedia Edits by Day, 2001–2010 by ptgorman
Sure, that's totally understandable. However, in over a decade of editing Wikipedia, I've never ever ever heard someone refer to a WP admin as a "mod". Wikipedia does not have moderators. The purpose of an admin is not to moderate or review the content that is being written. In fact, when it comes to pure content decisions, the opinion of an admin is not given any more weight than anyone else's opinion.
If you've edited there for as long as you said, you'd probably know all of that already. So, not that it matters, but I kinda think you're not really a regular contributor.
tremynci t1_jb0an01 wrote
Reply to comment by denisrennes in [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Looks like the 1957 Mayak disaster.
kyrsjo t1_jb09rc0 wrote
Reply to comment by Barra79 in [OC] Wind Speed Vs Wind Power by Barra79
I was wondering how you got the data, and that open-meteo thing is extremely interesting for getting historical data.
Last time i looked at this, which is about 5 years ago, the solution proposed to me by friends in climate science was to download datasets for testing climate models, and extract (very rough resolution) it from there. Or you could buy observational data from a meteo service for way too much money.
Bookmarked!
arrig-ananas t1_jb0966g wrote
Reply to [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Interesting graph, but my brain can't really comprehend the exponential growth in the colors so maybe try another depiction.
Also it would be fun see smoking on there (knows it another kind of killer, but just for putting in perspective what kills us)
YoRt3m t1_jb072sv wrote
Reply to comment by imapassenger1 in [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
I would expect it to be a flood, since that's what killed most people, and it's literally in the name. but okay
soundisloud t1_jb06zv7 wrote
Reply to comment by JetstreamFox in [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Really not your fault, it's a confusing graphic. Because ALL TIME and ONE YEAR are highlighted, it really sets you up to think this is comparing all aviation deaths ever.
IThrewThisOneAwayToo t1_jb0kvup wrote
Reply to [OC] All-Time Deadliest Accidents and Disasters vs. One Year of Traffic Deaths by databeautifier
Hello! Food Safety specialist and sanitarian here. I can assure you there were plenty more food borne illness related deaths but they’re often mistaken for other illnesses or go unreported. The death toll estimated by the FDA and CDC is closer to around 3,000 deaths per year from food borne illnesses.