Why would anyone care what your traders think without any information about who they are, their qualifications, their methods, etc.?

Then my recommendation is put an annotation that albums are listed chronologically in the bottom margin, and keep the albums below each data set, translucent at like 20% opacity.

Yeah but “beautiful data” shouldn’t have to be assumed it should be presented

[removed]

I think it just has to stem from an emergency, not during a declared emergency. Even so, this is a power Congress delegated to the executive branch.

I feel that canceling student loans is not a good play. What happens to kids going to school next year? School isn’t getting cheaper so what happens with their loans? The debt just gets propagated to the next generation. I think making all loans being paid in full at 0% interest is the way to go. This will provide a way forward for future generations and help those currently struggling with their loans. It will put an end to the debt cycle for those people that have paid more than they borrowed but haven’t made a dent on their loans due to interest. This will be unpopular for the far left and the far right, so it’s a reasonable compromise that would most likely pass.

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[removed]

I mean they’re in chronological order, that’s what the number are, but unnecessary because it obscures the album cover and it can be assumed they’re chronological.

Shit list of territories missing St Croix, worst in the world. hahah

Right? Does it go in order of albums she produced or what?

Different countries tend to use different baskets of goods to reflect their own consumption patterns. The OECD probably pulls their data from state statistics agencies (although it is possible they conducted their own survey)

She farted (aka breaking wind) which is illegal in Norway

such an earnest response to a painfully aloof comment, kudos

Okay but why the numbers

Mississippi looking good as hell here boy. Rubbing shoulders with Minnesota in the rankings. Damn fine showing, from a state that seems to live at the sad end of lists like this

It's odd you should say this. I'm 'bit of a Swiftie myself, and "Midnights" just doesn't do it for me. No shade, just interesting how people can listen to the same thing and hear something completely different.

What do you mean you say a profession is valued less? Do you want to suggest that it's done deliberately by someone or something?

The value of each profession is always a reflection of the market, that is, supply and demand. The employee always wants to be paid more and the employer always wants to pay as little as possible (regardless of the employee's gender).

If women were universally valued less as employees, that would just create a massive opportunity for companies hiring only women to have margins greater than their competitors. In a short time, many other companies would seize the same opportunity, increasing the demand for women's labor and thus normalizing the wages across gender.

My speculative take on this is that the biological differences between genders reflect on their average personality traits, making them choose jobs differently.

For being more competitive, men tend to pursue high-income careers and positions. Also, men have a predilection for things instead of people, which is a driver for choosing STEM careers. On the other hand, women gravitate more toward the humanities and don't focus so much on increasing their income. Of course there are plenty of exceptions, but on average, this seems to be the case.

The fact is the arctic ice would not all melt. It’s all scare tactics.

i think my favourite discovery may have been the FOURTH pen type - the permanent marker revenge song 😆

[removed]

>You can’t be serious, that you think that the US has more differences than a whole continent made out of twice as many people living in 50 countries

You keep saying "countries" like it matters, like it's different to a "state" in any way other than legal. In the US states have their own laws, and are part of the federal US which has overbearing laws. In the EU, countries have their own laws and are part of the federal EU, which has overbearing laws.

Take this as an example - the Scandinavian countries are Denmark, Finland and Sweden. The West Coast states are California, Seattle and Oregon.

I'll tell you now that there is MASSIVELY more cultural diversity in those three US states than there is in the Scandinavian countries.

The differences between California and Mississipi, for example, are very large, just like the differences between France and Bulgaria.

You seem to be assuming that Europe has far more differences than the US, but you don't seem to state why. They all (well, most) have different languages, sure - but CULTURALLY they are very close together. And from a legal point of view and from a tax point of view, there is a LOT of congruence in Europe that does not exist in the US.

>I don’t even know why all people from the US really want to believe that their state is sooo different from the others

California -> Mississipi is truly, unbelievable different. California is about as good as it gets in the modern world, Mississipi is pretty much third world.

>the US, and it’s all more or less the same, the difference are minimal against differences between whole countries.

I'm sorry, I just can't agree with this. I've lived in the UK, the US, France and spent time working in Eastern Europe. Financially, culturally, legally there is a lot of uniformity across the EU.

I wouldn't want to say which (EU or US) has more disparity - but once you ignore language, those differences are very comparable.

Yeah that was a typo :) But thankfully these probabilities are not estimated we came up with, they're the consensus of our traders, who are much smarter.