[deleted]

Not so sure about these data. Norwegian households waste 216100 metric tonnes of edible food each year. This translates to a couple of french fries per person per day.

https://www.matvett.no/uploads/documents/OR.36.21-Sektorrapport-for-matbransjen-offentlig-sektor-og-husholdningsleddet.pdf

(In Norwegian)

I dont see how this data shows they are overrated... The line representing their success has been pretty flat for the past 30 years compared to other more recently dominant teams... This data presents Norte Dame as a team that demonstrated unprecedented dominance until the early 90's and has had a little bit of success ever since.

2016 and 2018 they did not :)

The chart is cool but the coloring makes it tough to follow, at least for me on mobile. I found myself following Nebraska's rise in ~1994 to Ohio State's rise in 2001 to Alabama's rise in 2008 and wondering what the hell Alabama did in 1994 to have such a tremendous increase.

That bump in Michigan in 1995, also Saban

Edit: wrong Michigan

I think it'd be interesting to separate independents who are really either: 1. mixed opinion Republican/Democrat or 2. late-decision Republican or Democrat undecideds from people who consistently adhere to other parties (Libertarian, Greens, etc.).

[removed]

Who the fuck plays football in college? I played it in the streets since I was a kid

Interesting to see how negatively correlated Democratic Membership and Independents are. This speaks about how centered the American population really is…and why Biden is trying to appeal to that middle.

Then the report sucks and only wants to push an agenda. It does not make sense to include inedible parts as waste

hmmm definitely interesting

can we get more details on the mtrics for the collection and processing of this data?

like what is considered food wastage?

Bama fans were saying that about UGA just 3 short years ago.

The data is pretty flawed since it uses an arbitrary point system. It also doesn’t take into consideration that the rankings are horribly flawed. Ohio State has such an easy path to victory plus they are always over ranked that it skews the data.

This is almost ridiculous. Western countries waste less than Africa ? How do you even get accurate data from countries like Mali, Tchad or Nigeria ? Have you ever seen how much they throw out in supermarkets and restaurants in Europe ?

I noticed this one immediately, as well. Andor precedes Roque one. But, I can't imagine it's easy to put this together and keep it in a clean rectangle without gaps. It's actually really well done, considering.

[removed]

I didn’t say they cared about the schools. The good thing about numbers that are quantifiable is that they don’t care about opinions. The title of the chart is Which College Football Programs have been the most successful? Most successful at what? Winning? That’s not reflected in the chart. That chart shows what programs have been ranked the highest in the AP poll and it weights the playoff selection over the AP poll where there are conflicts. The AP is associated with the mythical National Championship and there is a reason the BCS relied on other polls as well to select the teams that played in the “championship game.” That was so controversial that it resulted in us finally getting a 4 team playoff which was controversial so we got a larger, fairer playoff. So, either the title of the chart needs to change or the data inputs and weighting needs to change.

This is why people make fun of redditors

Why is there so much food waste in Nigeria ? How is the waste calculated ?

The flaw in this data is only using the AP poll. This leaves split national title years, 1990, 1991, and 1997 for example awarding 1 team 8 pts, and the other 4, when all of CFB agrees there were 2 rightful claims. Additionally the AP did not include bowl games in their final poll until 1968, this is why so many seasons before then have multiple claims on those championships.

Piss on em

[removed]

Definitely disagree with you on that one. People care a lot more about a 10-2 power 5 team than an 11-1 group of 5 team. There’s definitely bias in the AP25 rankings but it’s a decent measurement imo, definitely compared to wins or conference championships. The latter would show the most dominant team per conference, not necessarily the best college football programs of all time

What about the Legends series ?

;)