Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

UsefulEngine1 t1_j9yucne wrote

Key on your last two words here.

You obviously believe that you're smarter than the actual military professionals who worked on this problem every one of whom apparently had never seen an actual balloon before. You believe if you had been sent up there on a paraglider with a nail on the end of a stick you could have brought it down for $300. You believe if you could just get your brilliant ideas out there to the People In Charge rather than in Reddit comments the world would run smoothly.

I believe you may be wrong

5

kompootor t1_j9ykd5j wrote

If it has no consequences, then it doesn't take balls to do.

The GA vote probably has more importance as a short-term PR boost (or burden) with headlines like these, so the countries that voted against the resolution probably were able to do something more in terms of moderating the Russia-China axis than the rest of the countries. Why? Because the only reason countries have to vote for anything not relevant to their politics is for something in return -- so every vote against is something Russia (or perhaps China) had to trade in. Of course most things aren't wholly zero-sum like that, but it's still the important thing to keep in mind with almost any assembly vote -- but especially GA -- that much or most of the real work is in the whipping behind the scenes.

1

DD_equals_doodoo t1_j9yhz1s wrote

It's effectively the same thing. Hence why that measure is used. It matches perfectly with 1 - rental rates.

I don't dispute that housing costs have outstripped income gains. However, when you look at the drivers of that, homes are also getting larger and more modern (read: expensive to build). Asbestos was in basically all old homes because it was dirt cheap. Same with shag carpets. Same with lead in paint, etc.

Edit: Home sizes more than doubled from 1960 to 2010 https://www.newser.com/story/225645/average-size-of-us-homes-decade-by-decade.html

2