Me too. I've felt bad for Millennials for a while now in their supposed inability to own their own home. It would appear I've done so for naught.

I would argue researchers in the United States, of all places, are acutely aware of the nuance and complexity surrounding race and ethnicity.

No worries. Most people don’t know because they’ve never needed to. And most of my experience is in retail and specifically grocery. Some sectors of retail do have higher margins. Home improvement, and some apparel companies for example. But I am not well versed enough in their operations to know a lot about them.

I am quite surprised that the generational gaps are as small as they are

What a very binary view of what constitutues 'race', 'black' or 'white'.

I guess that's the state of race relations in the US. It would not be appropriate for most other countries, certainly not New Zealand.

Does anybody happen to know of a GIS layer for something like this?

Actually, I think its more likely that this is just normal sensationalism that happens to coincide with Russian propaganda. An article about how most of the worlds GDP is on the ukranian side doesnt have that concern tang that the NYTimes loves.

Have you considered the fact that the NYT employs a bunch of dipshits?

Cool story, nobody claimed it did or that 5% was their tax rate, at any point. Again, why are you just listing random fun facts off topic from the thread in response to nobody?

The graph says it is tax / revenue, it does not say it is their "Tax rate". It did not mix it up, there was never any error, you and the guy at the top of this comment chain just pretended something was said that wasn't, then "corrected" an imaginary error you made up. The chart even went out of its way to give you an asterisk telling you that that wasn't what it was talking about, which you still ignored.

Again, having a 5% rate there doesn’t mean that their tax was 5% of their revenue though, that’s what I’m trying to say

[removed]

> The tax data reported on an income statement is “income tax expense”, which is $19B for Apple

That's the SCALAR amount on the chart.

We have been talking about the PERCENT written next to it.

The percent (5%) is very very clearly indicated on the chart as $19B (all tax paid) / $394B (total revenue) = 4.82% rounds to 5%.

AKA total taxes / revenue. So if you were ever talking about a % other than taxes / revenue, you were simply off topic. Nobody ever claimed that was their tax rate, or anything else, just total taxes / revenue.

This sankey diagram comes from their income statement. The tax data reported on an income statement is “income tax expense”, which is $19B for Apple, and what’s reported on this specific sankey diagram. It’s what you’ve been referring to, but your wrong that it’s the inflow/outflow of tax, because that’s not what the sankey diagram is showing in the tax amount reported

The chart makes crystal clear that what it's showing is tax as a portion of revenue.

You said "That’s not what income tax expense is though." So by your own definition, your term you used cannot possibly be referring the chart, since you said it doesn't mean tax / revenue, yet the chart very clearly shows tax / revenue.

Pick one:

• You're talking about [tax / revenue] (if so, why did you say that that wasn't what the term you used meant if it was...?), OR

• You're talking about something not in this chart (if so, why are you off topic?)

[removed]

…income tax expense is the tax portion of the chart, it’s literally what you and the other guy were talking about this whole time

You just said that that specific portion of the sankey chart was measuring the inflow and outflow

[removed]

But only on the left side, yeah, that’s the crimped side.

There was a housing act that created redlining that basically was enabled as soon as World war I was done. It was socialism to buy houses, but of course, it was also during a time of extremely overt racism.

Here's an entertaining John Oliver episode on it. Coincidentally it also covers the data on this graph.

Latinos can fall into either of these two groups.

Can you please draw a circle around where in this graph or in any of my comments, you encountered the term "income tax expense"?

My brother in christ, it literally just tells you how big the flowy bit of the sankey diagram is on the right versus the flowy bit on the left, it's not that complicated. YOU'RE the only one talking about (and incorrectly assuming everyone else is too) specific tax jargon and normal/official types of tax metrics.

That’s not what income tax expense is though. It doesn’t have anything to do with the inflow or outflow of tax

I never put him on a schedule; I've generally always followed his lead with respect to how often he wants for feed. This was possible since I was off work the first 7.5 months, and even after that I have mostly worked from home so I could keep nursing as needed/desired.

It is not, since it's data I gathered myself and I haven't published this project in a public repository or anything. I suppose I could consider doing that.

Oh, you're right re: Monday! I didn't notice that in the rules... But mods haven't removed this post, right?

I have a different chart for total minutes spent breastfeeding per day; I can share it later when I am back on my computer (currently on my phone after a middle of the night wakeup :))