Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful
Then_I_had_a_thought t1_j8z0v20 wrote
Reply to comment by SnooPeripherals1914 in [OC] Is Bitcoin price correlated with Google search volume or not? by against_all_odds_
In grad school we called it “Chi by Eye”
[deleted] t1_j8z0dqs wrote
[removed]
sundios t1_j8yzkx3 wrote
Google trends does not get you search volume, it gives you interest of the query. Keyword planner gets you search volume, but it has a 2 month lag.
OrangeFire2001 t1_j8yzc01 wrote
Reply to [OC] The cost of training AI on ImageNet has decreased from over $1000 to just under $5 in just 4 years by giteam
But is this assuming it’s stealing art from the internet, or is it being paid for?
J-Vis t1_j8yzb4n wrote
What the fuck are we going to do about this plastic situation
SaintUlvemann t1_j8yz6pi wrote
Reply to comment by What-Fries-Beneath in [OC] Is Bitcoin price correlated with Google search volume or not? by against_all_odds_
All the efforts of all the cryptocurrencies in the world haven't yet reached the level of day-to-day practical utility as a McDonald's giftcard; because I can spend the giftcard to buy the hamburger, but there is no store anywhere around me that accepts Bitcoin, or any other cryptocurrency.
[deleted] t1_j8yz5if wrote
[deleted]
LotLizard55 t1_j8yz5f1 wrote
Reply to comment by What-Fries-Beneath in [OC] Is Bitcoin price correlated with Google search volume or not? by against_all_odds_
Fixed supply money tied to energy. Peer to peer and can have final settlement in seconds. Must have some value no?
[deleted] t1_j8yx4n9 wrote
Reply to comment by DarkC0ntingency in [OC] Gun Homicide Rate vs. Gun Ownership Rate in the United States by Social_Philosophy
[removed]
DarkC0ntingency t1_j8ywxz1 wrote
Reply to comment by Dragon-Ash in [OC] Gun Homicide Rate vs. Gun Ownership Rate in the United States by Social_Philosophy
Whatever comment you’re referring to I can’t find. I even looked at past comments on your profile but when I try to open them it doesn’t load. Weird.
Emotional_Squash9071 t1_j8ywo08 wrote
Reply to comment by kursdragon2 in [OC] The cost of training AI on ImageNet has decreased from over $1000 to just under $5 in just 4 years by giteam
If something cost a billion $ and you brought the price down to a million $, I’m pretty sure you’d think dropping it from a million to 250k is pretty great too.
Dragon-Ash t1_j8ywj8g wrote
Reply to comment by DarkC0ntingency in [OC] Gun Homicide Rate vs. Gun Ownership Rate in the United States by Social_Philosophy
OP's data is garbage, the chart is meaningless - see my comment below.
Dragon-Ash t1_j8ywi2x wrote
Reply to comment by Excellent-Practice in [OC] Gun Homicide Rate vs. Gun Ownership Rate in the United States by Social_Philosophy
OP's data is garbage, the chart is meaningless - see my comment below.
johnyjohnybootyboi t1_j8yw9k8 wrote
Reply to [OC] The cost of training AI on ImageNet has decreased from over $1000 to just under $5 in just 4 years by giteam
I don't like the uneven scale of the y-axis, it doesn't show the full proportion of the decline
DarkC0ntingency t1_j8yveqg wrote
So correlation is weak, if existent at all. Am I reading this correctly?
svn380 t1_j8yurhh wrote
Reply to comment by droolingdonkey in [OC] Top 10 largest economies by average values of GDP by highcharts
-
Comparing living standards across countries is interesting.
-
Comparing the size of different countries ' economies is also interesting.
The graph is trying to do (2). It is not trying to do (1).
crimeo t1_j8yr5mf wrote
Reply to comment by Lurkalope in [OC] Plastic waste emitted to the ocean per country by sometiara1
I don't disagree both countries sending and receiving are to blame, but the original comment was about how plastic laws in the US are "idiotic" because of a perception of low US waste being dumped.
Yet the US waste that ends up being dumped is on the very high end, because even if a minority gets dumped, it produces so much overall than a minority still dwarfs other countries. So those laws are not, in fact, "idiotic".
greenking2000 t1_j8yr0yq wrote
Reply to comment by PM_ME_WITTY_USERNAME in [OC] The cost of training AI on ImageNet has decreased from over $1000 to just under $5 in just 4 years by giteam
You can donate your idle CPU time to do research if you want
You install a program and it when your CPU/GPU usage is low it’ll do calculations for that organisation
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_volunteer_computing_projects
Though he is likely on about Cloud Computing and got the name wrong
nerdydancing OP t1_j8yqm7l wrote
Reply to comment by AKA_BigTaco in My stripper earnings on Super Bowl Sunday and Monday as compared to the rest of the year [OC] by nerdydancing
VIPs might be better for the club but they charge high room fees to the dancers and/or keep a higher percentage of the total than single dances. When I used to set my own prices I made my VIPs expensive to make it worthwhile. I wrote a detailed comment about pricing on this post if you can find it.
[deleted] t1_j8yqfb9 wrote
[removed]
Gone247365 t1_j8yqdbl wrote
Reply to comment by Early_Lab9079 in [OC] The cost of training AI on ImageNet has decreased from over $1000 to just under $5 in just 4 years by giteam
You are OnlyFans?
Prestigious-Rip-6767 t1_j8yq0h4 wrote
Reply to comment by earthlingkevin in [OC] The cost of training AI on ImageNet has decreased from over $1000 to just under $5 in just 4 years by giteam
you don't like aws
[deleted] t1_j8ypzn2 wrote
[deleted]
AKA_BigTaco t1_j8ypvlr wrote
Reply to comment by nerdydancing in My stripper earnings on Super Bowl Sunday and Monday as compared to the rest of the year [OC] by nerdydancing
Interesting. How much are the set rates? Seem counterintuitive that VIP would make you less money. I always thought the VIP is the upsell service.
debunk_this_12 t1_j8z172i wrote
Reply to [OC] Job Search by Menacingamaranth
Nothing against you op, but I hat the visuals of these charts