Naked caveman eyeballs are not that useful for answering how much they're correlated, and any follow-up questions like which one is leading. Do you know how to do statistical tests? If you do, why are you asking?

I hope ur day gets better!! And thanks for understanding. Best of luck to you too

A pretty good reason, actually. All the best in your future!

Dozens of countries have done it and didn't go into any sort of mysterious recession or have years and years of massive complications of any sort. So... wrong? Observably wrong.

/u/accurate_reporter252 that is assuming everyone having guns would somehow have led to fewer deaths in those cases. Please refer to the graph at the top of the screen... or the fact that everyone in WWII had guns...

The most proven effective way to cause societal change is NONVIOLENT protest, for which you don't need guns. It turns out to be more effective by not escalating into further violence and thus garnering more and more sympathy from the unconvinced population who join your side until strikes and such grind the country to a halt, unless change is made, which it then is. Violent protest is much more rarely successful

http://cup.columbia.edu/book/why-civil-resistance-works/9780231156820

I will not be replying here again since reddit does not allow you to reply to third parties when some other guy your replied to blocked you, so you will have to take it to DMs if you like.

edit 2 "literally cannot reply here because of a bug" was confusing, I guess, so continued at https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/113twme/oc_gun_homicide_rate_vs_gun_ownership_rate_in_the/j932gyn/

Oh, no worries. I'm actually having a shitty day myself, so I can relate.

[removed]

Bitcoin went up when more people bought it, a side effect was googling how to buy it.

The $70k had more opportunities for personal growth in the position!

There is no correlation. That's kinda the point.

Sorry you beat me to it. Just had a super long day didn’t mean to be rude.

Well, that's why I asked why, as in what are these reasons.

What are you charging for the various services? Curious what this look like if you look at a unit price/net earnings model. Is there a product mix optimization play here?

Bc I value other things besides money?

Edit: Didn’t mean to sound rude but to me $5k isn’t as important as how I’m going to be spending 40-50 hours of my life every week

There is nothing cheap or simple about banning guns.

Explain Japan and South Korea?

Ah yes, a nice Pinot Grigio pairs well with Doritos and pizza rolls

Anecdotally, spikes in search interest seem to be related to the large changes in the slope of the price. Cool graph, i agree with the r squared guy too

Think he means cloud based computing power?

As in rather have 1 PC here and one pc there doing the work individually, linking them up and sharing the load

[removed]

[removed]

What is that open source computing power you speak of?

Would be interesting to see a similar chart for Dogecoin, the ultimate memecoin

0 is lower, 60% is higher (darkest).

Paramilitaries are organised in association with some consistent aim and objective. PMCs are more often groups of mercenaries for hire.

Well R-sqr would be if one was a model of the other. This would just need a correlation coefficient.