Completely agree with above. Also though, you would loosely expect to see a 'google' trend of this nature follow any topic of interest. Certainly not a leading indicator.

What's the best way to, on Android, make one of those charts where you color in days on a calendar to track events?

Liberalism just means granting more freedoms. It can pretty much be right or left, but in America liberal is an ideology between moderate and progressive

Scatterplot the two vars and do a Pearson's rho (on day z the price of bitcoin was $x and the search count on Google was y, for each day in T)

I hope this is satire

but your suggestions to split it up in multiple graphs is far worse or only show data from 2017 and 2018.

Than everyone would wonder how ho wit developed after 2018.

You can make the same claims about every stock market chart which is displayed in log scale. "These movements don't matter because 96% of the growth was in the past."

but the recent development is very important too. In this case that it still continues to go.

It is still down 35% in the last year, which lets you see we are not even close to the end of the read.

One might argue the 98.92% decrease says a lot less because when something is not done in scale it is always at first extreme expensive. So I don't agree that they make it look less impressive than it is.

So as long as your point is people don't understand how to read log charts I still disagree with you.

How did it get more expensive in 2019?

Where do their residential tractors fit in? I figured they were a small part but they are probably what is most recognizable about the company.

Also I've heard some some grumbling from farmers about not being able to do basic repairs themselves and service contracts being kindof forced on them as subscription services. Would that fall under financial products?

I used the web-based interface to generate this model (using NOAA's servers). You can run it yourself here or install the software locally on your computer. https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php

You don’t need to know exactly what it is. You need a mass emission rate. Granted there’s some guess work. You know the mass leaked. You can guess % burned. But you still have to know % combined with oxygen. Still whatever compounds produced by burning are going to be really nasty. The were some fixed site monitors upwind that measured pretty high polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). I beg there were some chlorinated ones too. The just like regular PAHs, chlorinated PAHs are going to be around for a long time but longer. And Cl-PAHs are going to more toxic and there’s not a lot of good data to derive health benchmarks. We’re going to have to see what diseases pop up for people and ecosystems.

I haven't tried to use the ERA5 reanalysis dataset with HYSPLIT, but it appears that you can use this python-based converter for ingesting ERA5 grib files to ARL.

Molson is Canadian and merged with coors….. not sure how you can claim it’s not American

That would still be more than like half the whole countries on here

I think you're mixing "conservationist" and "conservative".

The reason conservative is used is partially historical naming and partially because they typically want to "conserve" the status quo.

Lately however they have become more and more regressive so there are certainly some who could go in the fascist bucket imo

Has not been American owned in almost 20 years. Corporate and North American headquarters are in Toronto. Trading on a US exchange doesn't mean anything.

Sorry to mountain piss all over an "American" brand like Coors.

You can't just listen to what a liar says, then beleive the opposite. That's makes absolutely no sense.

You just need to understand their motivations as to why they would (or wouldn't) lie

SBF has little reason to lie here and what he's saying makes perfect sense.

He just wanted his "business" to be legitimate in the eyes of the law and be regulated he wanted it to, and to achieve the most legitimacy he tried to buy out both parties. Makes perfect sense.

[removed]

That's debateable. Friedman had deeply liberal beliefs and openely talked about donating to groups with very liberal values.

The chart don't represent political parties at all, just the ideological leanings of the groups they donated to.

Edit: in fact, I'm pretty certain most people are misunderstanding what this shows. They're trying to make it sound like the money either went to the Democrats or the Republicans. That data will be in there, but they'll be in there alongside organisations like the ACLU.

Groups like this. https://www.startguide.org/orgs/orgs00.html

[deleted]

That's not it, it's that the terms they are using are intentionally useless and vague.

You're not supposed to understand what they really mean

If this were in a scientific publication where seeing the actual numbers in each year was important, I might agree. But this is a data visualisation purporting to show the trend in costs over 5 years, and it is failing to show the main trend clearly. It's the difference between 'showing the data' and 'showing the story'

Not 75%. It only looks like that. It's actually 98.2% in two years. That's exactly why the post distorts the data.

Bangladesh has a lovely anthem Azerbaijan has a anthem that slaps Anyways amar sonar ban-

[removed]

Yes let's trust the Friedmans word, btw i am Nigerian prince I have a proposition