Recent comments in /f/creepy

RemRose t1_j96pva2 wrote

Reply to comment by TinKicker in Nuclear shadow, Nagasaki by allez05

Oh yes history would in fact indicate that because if you try to remove a entire island out of existence then absolutely yes they stop their shit. However if i want my baby mother to stop being controlling about my child i should just kill her, if i want my dog to behave i should just beat it to a inch of its life so it cant misbehave anymore if i want the bullying in school to stop i should just shoot it up. The point is yes it worked. Was that necessary and should we just have the thought process of well they killed people too so its cool. No. All of this aside am I suffering from guilt and losing sleep over this no absolutely not but to defend the slaughtering of a race cuz they did bad stuff too is really not how your brain should work.

−2

TinKicker t1_j96nrem wrote

Reply to comment by UnknwnSoldier in Nuclear shadow, Nagasaki by allez05

I’ve walked through areas scorched by wildfires that were hot enough to fuse sand into tiny glass beads…there were “shadows” of cattle and kangaroos on the ground. It’s essentially a grease spot.

1

TinKicker t1_j96mqgc wrote

Reply to comment by skynetempire in Nuclear shadow, Nagasaki by allez05

Fun fact (which I stumbled upon during a visit to Hiroshima)…

After touring the museum and its surrounding grounds, you are left with the impression that Ground Zero was directly above the Peace Memorial or perhaps the Dome. At least, that’s what I felt. If you Google “ground zero” those are the photos that will show up.

After the museum, my colleague and I were walking to a nearby shopping mall. About halfway to the mall, we came upon a small cement monument just outside the front door of an apartment building…

That is ground zero.

30

RemRose t1_j96m2q0 wrote

Reply to comment by LDarrell in Nuclear shadow, Nagasaki by allez05

No but stopping the war has to be agreed upon by both parties and while the majority of the civilians of japan no longer supported the war effort their government would not sign any form of treaty to end this. Nuking them was a gross extension of power not just once but twice. The proper answer would have been to sanction the fuck out of a island that had burned most bridges to its surrounding neighbors but our answer to the problem was unfortunately to try to cause the most death we could to a bunch of people not involved in a way shape or form because we wanted to see a big boom. So the idea that oh well they deserved it because they killed people too is a very harmful thought process in general.

−3

LDarrell t1_j96l3ia wrote

Reply to comment by RemRose in Nuclear shadow, Nagasaki by allez05

No the answer to stop the war. Would it have been better to invade the island of Japan and kill maybe a million more military on both sides and main land Japanese civilians?

1

RemRose t1_j96jx3h wrote

Reply to comment by LDarrell in Nuclear shadow, Nagasaki by allez05

So the answer to people killing millions of innocent people is to kill millions more? Yeah good thing you aren’t in any sort of position of power huh? Every country has killed innocents in mass numbers so it would be no problem if we just burned your children for those crimes right? With that thought process you are part of those sorts of problems and it would be beneficial if you never had a say in anything ever.

0