Recent comments in /f/boston

johndburger t1_j9zi29t wrote

Then you may have some recourse. You might have already done this, but you can see lots of discussion of Xfinity easements here:

https://forums.xfinity.com/conversations/search?q=Easement

I’d probably start there, their support folks seem relatively responsive.

14

bcardarella OP t1_j9zhitw wrote

What blows me away is that they were going to dig a 200ft trench on private property and tear up a front walk way and plant bed without permission. I spoke with the owner of the company Comcast contracted for this work and he said he'd have a supervisor speak with me but it wasn't clear that they don't plan on doing this still. I could wake up to the sound a crew in my yard next week.

71

DeffNotTom t1_j9zgrzz wrote

You can likely call them and just say you don't want it. But if you deny it now and ever want to switch to their internet, you'll have to pay a hefty sum out of pocket to get connected. Could be an issue for you down the road if you want to sell. Running fiber isn't like laying something like a water or sewer main, it shouldn't require them tearing up a large portion of your lawn. Usually just a small cut that can be covered/hidden again pretty easily.

157

johndburger t1_j9zgl76 wrote

You’re not really answering the question. Are you sure there is not an existing easement on your property? Nothing in all the papers you signed when you bought the house? If there’s an existing line as you indicated, it wouldn’t be surprising that they have an easement.

Not sure about Boston, but many cities have generic easements in place for all utilities, and the 2015 Net Neutrality legislation classified broadband as a utility.

67

bcardarella OP t1_j9zf9a5 wrote

Nope, literally marked all the way from the street to the corner of my house where our utilities come in. Not an easement. Note left stated the intention to install Comcast fiber lines which I do not want and have not requested. It's about 200 ft from the street.

100

BostonUniStudent t1_j9zcw9u wrote

The US government made a pretty good career aptitude test. Not a lot of people know about it. Your partner can access it here:

https://dol-vets.careerscope.net/assessment

It's free. I'd give a solid hour to answer all the questions accurately. It tests some abilities too. Like mechanical thinking, attention to detail, stuff like that.

At the end it poops out two lists. Things you would be good at and things you would like. Sometimes there's a lot of overlap there.

Community college, trade schools, and apprenticeships are always a good way to start a career without huge monetary and time commitments.

2

BostonUniStudent t1_j9zbw7m wrote

Are you traveling alone?

You like bar/restaurant recommendations?

I like Versus downtown. It's a video game bar that is good for meeting new people. They have controllers at the bar. You can just pick one up and strike up a conversation with the people next to you or the bartender. Only a $5 cover, and that means you can play all the games for free all night. Pretty good deal.

I'm kind of an introvert. So it definitely helps to have an excuse to talk to others.

2

rip_wallace t1_j9zbkak wrote

It’s a reading comprehension error on your end. It’s 21 permanent dispatchers, ANOTHER 5 on loan (which makes it 26) and another 3 in training.

But take your upvotes for shitting on the T with a false claim, I guess.

Edit: Here is the MBTA’s presentation disproving your bullshit lie. https://cdn.mbta.com/sites/default/files/2023-02/2023-02-24-1-report-from-the-general-manager.pdf

4

letoatreides_ OP t1_j9zautb wrote

That is a good point, "demand" is never really just the # of potential "buyers", but also each buyers willingness to pay, which is of course highly influenced by their ability to pay. Once there's a shortage of anything, assuming prices are allowed to freely fluctuate, those with the most $$ are first in line. But that's capitalism for ya.

At least the government has a separate pool of income restricted housing units, where the selection is based not on wealth, but on (household size/dependents? seniority on the waitlist? being a lottery also...luck?)

1