Recent comments in /f/boston

Thatguyyoupassby t1_j6orblg wrote

That's really the big thing for me.

I didn't really want to leave Boston when my wife and I moved. But I hated paying $2,300 for a 1 bed, 4th floor walkup.

So we moved to Quincy Center, and eventually Wallaston, where it was kind of the best of both world for a while. Quieter than Boston, cheaper than Boston, but with bars, restaurants, and T access to Boston.

A few months back we finally bought a single family home further down the south shore. Car needed to get anywhere. And when you get there, you need it to go to the next place. It's rare that 2 things we need are close by.

So I welcome these mixed use places.

More young people, which helps drown out the older and more conservative crowd? Love it.

More housing close by, which is also good to have in case we ever fall on tough times and need to downsize? Great.

More things to do on weekends, places to eat, room for local stores? Perfect.

If we can just add more commuter rail stops/more frequent trains, id would really be perfect. But even without that, these projects are a great thing.

Unfortunately, NIMBYs are scared of EVERYTHING.

My town just got a community electric program. We will be paying .06 less per KWH than with Eversource alone (.16 vs .22). The local facebook group is littered with:

"I don't trust this program"

"I'm opting out - why are they forcing this on us?"

"This seems fishy to me."

Meanwhile, the pamphlet we got has all of the answers to their questions right there, and you can opt out at any time.

People are so afraid of change, it kills me.

21

BigHmmEnergy t1_j6oqxyb wrote

Pretty good. Although I think your subway lines go too far away from the city. Foxboro, Brockton, Framingham, basically anything outside 128/95 would be better served by high frequency commuter rail with local/express service. I agree with converting the Green Line D branch to an extension of the blue line via a new tunnel past Charles/MGH through the back bay, although I wouldn’t extend it past riverside. I’m also surprised you didn’t restore the A branch to Watertown.

2

mycoplasma79 t1_j6oq6d2 wrote

Go to each of your neighbors’ homes. Ask for a cup of sugar. Say you are out of sugar if asked. While there, quickly scan their home for your packages. Worst case, you can’t find your packages but you end up with a few cups of sugar. This will also make your neighbors like you - people oddly like those they feel they’ve helped out.

Report back.

−1

Sufficient-Opposite3 t1_j6oq3nk wrote

I don't live too far from there and I think they should do it. That area is a wasteland of parking lots. They built the apartments on the hill above Quincy Adams Station and they seem to be full. Why wouldn't these be? It's near restaurants and stores. There's roads in and out. They can "gate off" the neighborhood behind there if they want. And, there will be low income housing mixed in. I wish there was more but it's a start. And, how many people are constantly in this group looking for housing options?

29

amos106 OP t1_j6oq2sz wrote

At some point we have to accept we are not Europe and we can't just instantly undo 70 years of developing car-centric cities and suburbs. We don't have mixed used block housing and sprawling plazas and parks, we have dying malls and over conjested roadways from everyone being forced to drive 20 minutes just to go shopping or visit a restaurant. If we can revive the malls by building dense housing nearby, we can start to look at expanding public transit since there will be a thriving mall worth visiting as well housing that is condusive to car-free lifestyles. Plus if it attracts white-collar workers and young families that means those people aren't being forced to outbid lower income people and gentrify the existing housing market. The only people who benefit from not building housing are the NIMBYs who want to see their property value go up for no reason other than the fact that they like getting money for doing absolutely nothing (except complain about "neighborhood character" and increased property taxes).

17

ToadScoper t1_j6opypn wrote

What really needs to be done is regional rail, or at the very least more frequent trains on key corridors. While full electrification is required for true regional services, regional rails pilot could be implemented in the interim with more frequent diesel services on key corridors until electrification happens (I believe the previous MBTA control board considered this plan in 2021). A new off-board fare system is crucial to regional rail and really should be considered moving forward

1