Recent comments in /f/books

Emergency_Revenue678 t1_jdhis83 wrote

If you want complicated, give Book of the New Sun and Urth of the New Sun by Gene Wolfe a go. There is absolutely no way you will catch even half of the background intricacies on a first read. I like to listen to analysis of stuff I like and I didn't realize most of the things they talk about, but everything they say makes perfect sense when you go back and think about the writing and narrative.

Gene Wolfe is one of the most highly regarded speculative fiction authors ever. I'm looking forward to continuing his lexicon.

1

Mr-Reanimator t1_jdhi04t wrote

Honestly, idk if 'chronically online' would describe them nearly as well as just 'super toxic and mean', but there are certainly people like this out there.

I think that it can come from many angles, too, which kind of sucks. There are toxic, elitist, gatekeepers that are super into literature in general... and there are toxic gatekeepers who swarm around a given author or franchise (not to name any examples lol). I'm sure that if you really wanna get into it, there's more than just these two levels of toxicity in literature circles, but it's a heck of a thing.

1

APwilliams88 t1_jdhfmq2 wrote

Reply to comment by slimpickins757 in Toxic book fans by sunforthemoon

Huge King fan myself, and I honestly had to leave the King sub because I found the post to be way too repetitive. That sub has a huge problem with that, in my opinion. It got old. I never told people to not post that stuff though. That's their business. I just got sick of reading the exact same post every time I was on the sub, so I left.

2

BwanaAzungu t1_jdhfi2g wrote

Counterpoint:

There is no reason to bring race or racial attributes into a fantastical story in the first place, unless it serves the narrative.

  • We can describe people's features without mentioning racial traits. For example, why mention skin colour at all? "A tall figure, with a strong yet agile built, and a slender face with a gentle smile".

  • It's more interesting to describe people by cultural aspects that are subjected to choice, instead of racial aspects that one is born with. Don't mention the black hair or sunkissed skin of the princess, mentioned the detailed embroidery on her sand-coloured silken robe, and the different metals and jewels in her jewelry. Perhaps she has tattoos.

Of course many stories focus on overcoming racial differences. I wholeheartedly agree, a diverse cast is paramount to that. In this case, it is important to establish that there are indeed different races, what the differences are, and strong animosity between the races; such that the main cast can rise above it first, and racial differences at large can be challenged and overcome later. In this case, it serves the narrative to include all these racial aspects.

12

Hour_Squirrel_4914 t1_jdhf495 wrote

My sister was an incredible reader and had a fourth grade teacher who did this. My mom pestered him asking if her reading level could be tested so that she could check out books that were more challenging. He finally agreed and she tested at 12th grade level.

His argument then became, "Just because she can understand the text, doesn't mean she can understand the theme. So, she needs to stick to the fourth grade reading level."

No compromise. No flexibility. No interest.

You can guess how many books she borrowed from the library that year.

2

iwasjusttwittering t1_jdhey5n wrote

Reply to comment by beameup19 in Toxic book fans by sunforthemoon

Echo chambers: exist.

The Reddit format also favors hype and content with quick turnaround. (I'm comparing it to classic forums where you can have long discussions that last more than a few hours/days but weeks/months.)

In my experience (years in places such as /r/mechanicalkeyboards), it's very easy to get downvoted for posting only factual information (yes, not being snarky either), not to mention skepticism wrt latest hypetrain.

8

nyet-marionetka t1_jdhdnuc wrote

Reply to comment by Superb-Draft in Toxic book fans by sunforthemoon

No, you don’t get it on reddit. That could happen from cross-subreddit posting if someone points a community in your direction, but the admins crack down on that. A bunch of individual people stumbling on your comment and disagreeing with you isn’t the same as a person sending their followers to stalk you online, trash talk you in your comments, and post their own stuff targeted at you. Reddit is generally a pretty civil place by comparison to tiktok and tumblr.

−6

Isatis_tinctoria OP t1_jdhcxwy wrote

That's kind of sad that the academic library does not have physical books. Why doesn't it have physical books? Is it just a matter of budget?

This is a fascinating insight into what you do with those numbers.

So, if we check out more books, the libraries have the data to show that there is a need and desire for such books, then you can take those numbers and request even more money?

Edit: What happens to books that are barely checked out but could be useful for research - such as academic books? In other words, perhaps Harry Potter is checked out constantly. But if there are niche subjects of academic topics. They could be useful to maybe one person a semester. Will those books survive?

1