Recent comments in /f/books
THEBIGREDAPE t1_jddppml wrote
Unfortunately, we're onto the 4th generation of kids that have gone through a post Thatcher education system. This was her end goal.
Adelaide_Farmington t1_jddplmb wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
I really wish they had a 1/2 star option too. I feel like, for me, there is too much variation between 3-4 and 4-5 stars.
RabbitInHeadlights t1_jddpkw1 wrote
Reply to Internal voice when reading by 1__ajm
Yes I've always read like you. Every word, every sound, every motion my brain can muster.
I love reading, but it can take me weeks and months on a book or two.
My wife apparently just kind of "understands" the words as her eyes follow the page and she's insanely fast.
LadybugGal95 t1_jddpicr wrote
Reply to Do you give books to people? by BwanaAzungu
I am an avid reader. My sister, not so much. She had kids before me. So, I started giving all my nieces and nephews a book as well as a toy for Christmas each year to ensure they had books. I needn’t have worried. Anyway, when everyone started getting older it got harder, of course. Two years ago, I considered stopping the tradition (kids sophomore in high school through 3rd grade). Before announcing it, the sophomore told me what she really wanted for Christmas was for me to preorder this book for her. A different niece told me how much she loved that I gave them books. So, yeah, I still get them books.
Accomplished_Trip_ t1_jddpa71 wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
It’s very rare for me to give less than a five, because I love stories. So it goes like this:
5- Yeah! Excellent, excellent, very good, well done, solid story. 2-4- all right, it’s a book, but I’m wrestling with something. 1- ….I don’t like you.
Dnmrtn t1_jddosj1 wrote
Reply to comment by moviestim in 5 N.Y. Schools Evacuated After Bomb Threats Over LGBTQ+ Book by wdcmsnbcgay
Do you know who it is? It did not say in the article or any of the others I read online.
Hazel_nut1992 t1_jddojp4 wrote
Reply to comment by BKM558 in Appreciating the Hunger Games by Friesandmayo2665
You’re right, it’s not, it’s written as a tragedy, these two people cost themselves their lives due to impulsiveness and thoughtlessness, while destroying a lot of other people in the process. And it’s clearly outlined in the text but I think too many people, especially teens who haven’t been exposed to the text, just get the summary, two young lovers whose families won’t let them be together die for their love.
Bumblebree1903 t1_jddocw0 wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
5 Stars: I loved it AND it was well written, I would recommend the book and will look into more of the author’s work. A lot of re-read value.
4 Stars: I enjoyed it, fairly well written with only a few flaws to smack it down from 5 stars. I would still recommend the book, but it’s a 50/50 shot if I’ll re-read or look more into the author.
3 Stars: It’s not bad, but it’s not good. Several things put me off or there was one big glaring issue. 50/50 shot if I recommend it and I won’t look more into the author without a lot of persuading. Will only reread if part of a better series.
2 Stars: It’s not the worst thing in the world, but I wouldn’t recommend it or would discourage people from reading it.
1 Star: Either a DNF or a book I hated with a passion. Typically means I finished the book angry, but for the wrong reasons. Typically if I feel like my time has been wasted I’ll rate a book 1 star.
rekabis t1_jddocuq wrote
Reply to comment by BlakRainbow1991 in 5 N.Y. Schools Evacuated After Bomb Threats Over LGBTQ+ Book by wdcmsnbcgay
Well, in the States you guys call them Y’all Quaeda or the Texas Taliban.
Up here in Canada, we just call them the Timbit Taliban.
marylebow t1_jddo7ug wrote
Reply to comment by phoenixstormcrow in 5 N.Y. Schools Evacuated After Bomb Threats Over LGBTQ+ Book by wdcmsnbcgay
Nailed it.
paperseedsun t1_jddo2ew wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
i use storygraph and the rating is 0-5 and is quite specific as you can add 25 / .5 / .75 to your rating so i do
5 stars - very rare for me to give basically means i think it’s extremely well written with no flaws (a masterpiece) 4 stars - not without flaws but still amazing (some of my favourite books are even 4 stars because an imperfect book can often still hold a huge place in your heart) then i use the more specific ones for 3 star ratings so 3.25 stars for an average book and 3.75 for one which was great but not enough for a full 4 because it didn’t excite me enough to rank higher (basically not a new personal favourite) and 2 stars for books i liked the plot of but hated the execution (books that are inconsistent with the quality of writing can also fall into this category) 1 star is rare, usually reserved for modern books which i just found deeply offensive, that can’t be explained away by the time they were written in i don’t really give 0 star ratings because i got so used to using 1-5 on goodreads before i switched
[deleted] t1_jddnvqf wrote
[deleted]
QLC459 t1_jddnvfx wrote
Reply to Appreciating the Hunger Games by Friesandmayo2665
The first book was fantastic, the second and third book weren't even worth finishing imo.
​
It went from an action packed adventure/survival story with a lot of good drama in book 1 to a political thriller for books 2 and 3.
Plumbing6 t1_jddnosy wrote
Reply to comment by ExtraGravy- in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
I use this type of rating, and I write a review as well, since I read others reviews to see what they liked or disliked about a book.
akira2bee t1_jddnar6 wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
So I use storygraph so I get the quarter stars as well but for me it goes
1: why does this book exist?
2: very bad book, not enjoyable nor well-written
3: average, ok, forgettable/unmemorable
4: pretty good, had some flaws
5: absolutely perfect in every way, reread for sure, 10/10 will recommend every chance I get
ComicsNBigBooks t1_jddn43g wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
5 stars- one of the best books I've ever read/one of my favorites of all-time.
4 stars- very enjoyable; would probably read again
3 stars- decent enough one-time read
2 stars- didn't hate it but don't like it either
1 star- avoid at all costs
lydiardbell t1_jddmxzz wrote
Reply to comment by bustedbuddha in Why Kids Aren’t Falling in Love With Reading by drak0bsidian
I thought the Jobs' were always open about how they didn't allow their kids to use smartphones or tablets until they were teenagers.
lydiardbell t1_jddmpcg wrote
Reply to comment by Purple1829 in Why Kids Aren’t Falling in Love With Reading by drak0bsidian
Weird, it doesn't work with Firefox's reader mode. The two always seemed identical to me but I guess Safari's strips out more extra code
SimonJester88 t1_jddmijp wrote
Its peer pressure. Monkey see, monkey do, and MOST children do not read novels or nonfiction text unless assigned homework. Also, US adults read less books these days toos. Kids grow up seeing their peers and their adult role models NOT reading and develop similar habits.
Now that being said...I would not be surprised if youth today actually read more words per day than previous generations ..We are staring at our screens all day and the internet needs to be read in many places still.
thebig111 t1_jddm9ex wrote
Aside from the most insane reason to ever protest a book.
The school board should have reviewed the book first hand. it’s a book for adults. If they have an adult section for 18+ students great. The book even mentions hey this stuff is 18+. Like ohhh telling kids how to download Grindr on page 155. It also says hey you need to be +18 an adult. But I mean kids bring cards against humanity to the lunch room anyway.
CaptConstantine t1_jddlyyg wrote
Reply to Appreciating the Hunger Games by Friesandmayo2665
It starts off okay, but the writing goes downhill fast.
By the third novel, we see Katniss replaying entire scenes in her head with emotional commentary. Scenes we have already read. That's filler, that's just empty pages.
Parts of the series were interesting if you're comfortable with the fact that everything in the story is borrowed from a different, better story. Overall I'd give the trilogy a 6/10.
KoeiNL t1_jddlya0 wrote
Reply to comment by searchneptune in 5 N.Y. Schools Evacuated After Bomb Threats Over LGBTQ+ Book by wdcmsnbcgay
We still have countries where child brides are a common occurrence. I wish the innocence children was actually sacred.
LeoIsMyName09 t1_jddlrcr wrote
Reply to comment by pensieve64 in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
But what's interesting is that, as I said, it's rare for me to give 2 stars to a book. That is because I've noticed that often enough, if I don't enjoy a book but can imagine other people enjoying it, I'm likely to up the rating to 3 stars out of kindness, even if, objectively, it would be more of a 2 star for me. If it's not something I passionately hate, I often feel like rating something 2 stars is too mean. On the other hand, if I hate a book, then it's a one star (and usually, if I completely hate a book, it is because it's problematic in some way). That means that I rate very few books 2 stars.
RooneytheWaster t1_jddl391 wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
Generally:
5 stars - Loved it. Will definitely re-read at some point, and will probably recommend it to anyone and everyone. (not rated many books this highly)
4 stars - Enjoyed it, will likely re-read at some point. Will recommend to people if it seems their thing. (My most used rating, as these days I pre-filter books before I read 'em because I know what I like!)
3 stars - Was readable, but was lacking something, there were large sections which were un-enjoyable, or it was just not what I was hoping for/not the quality I expected. Not getting re-read unless I have to for some reason. Also for books that were "not my thing".
2 stars - Readable, but just not good. Poorly written/formatted/edited, or just really not for me.
1 stars - Bad. Either almost unreadable, or the dreaded DNF. For books that I will not only not recommend, but will tell people to actively avoid (such as deliberately misleading or offensive books).
Shack70 t1_jddpub5 wrote
Reply to comment by pensieve64 in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
Stars aren't the issue, there are people reviewing books they haven't read. Books that are not even out yet with multiple 5 star reviews. Goodreads reviews and ratings are fundamentally broken. I choose not to contribute to it. The only thing you could do is verified reviews but since Amazon bought Goodreads that means people would be locked into the Amazon ecosystem and that still doesn't stop the bogus reviews and ratings. It just means they bought the book through Amazon.