Recent comments in /f/books

wazzy360 t1_jdc5m6y wrote

Katniss’ ending still sticks with me. In all ways it seems “happy” but it’s pretty clear she hasn’t really gotten over her trauma. Thought it was a pretty courageous way to end a YA series.

139

Ollivete t1_jdc4ivd wrote

i just checked and apparently after the redesign it doesn't appear anymore when you hover the stars. i have changed to storygraph about a year ago.

i just rate it for myself. if it's a revolutionary book at the time of publishing i'll throw in an extra star or two for their contribution to literature even if i hated it

8

blue_bayou_blue t1_jdc3z4n wrote

To be honest my rating criteria isn't consistent, and I've gone back to change ratings a few times. I also use Storygraph which allows half and quarter stars, which makes the decision more complicated. That said, here's my general method:

5 stars - my absolute favourites, books that I both really enjoyed reading and are objectively well written.

4.5 stars - books I loved but had some flaw that keeps it from being a 5. Usually, books I had a blast reading but some part of plot or worldbuilding fell apart once I thought about it some more.

4 stars - books that are fairly enjoyable and engaging. Most books I finish are here.

3.5 stars - books I loved parts of. eg an excellent book with a disappointing ending, or one that has an amazing character or plot twist but is otherwise meh.

3 stars - OK books, that I liked but didn't make much of an impression. Also, books that I recognise are well written, but aren't for me.

2 stars - books I struggled to get though. Interesting enough characters or subject matter that I wanted to finish the book, but boring / repetitive / actively frustrating.

1 star - books that are objectively bad, that I did not enjoy. Has only happened a few times - a local history book that was plain inaccurate, an obnoxious celebrity memoir.

5

plauderi t1_jdc3yod wrote

I would actually appreciate it if it were possible to give half stars, many five star reviews of mine would probably be more like 4.5.

5 - loved it, could not stop reading/listening to it, would recommend it without doubts

4 - liked it, enjoyed it a lot, but not quite as thrilling / absorbing

3 - just ok

2 - part of it was enjoyable, but generally did not like it, probably took me longer to finish when I am reading multiple books at once

1 - absolutely hated it, considered stopping reading (I try not to DNF)

My average rating is 4.08, but I tend to do a lot of research before picking up a book, that keeps disappointments to a minimum.

20

InejandKaz t1_jdc3mrn wrote

5 stars: I loved it and will reread it.

4 stars: Great book but i would not read again / loved it overall but had some boring parts.

3 stars: It was ok but nothing stood out in a good or bad way / good book but bad ending / good but forgetable.

2 stars: Had some good parts or beginning but was bad overall / boring but good written / good story but dragging and badly written.

1 star: dnf book / badly written / whole book was boring / nothing was good about it

44

LamppostBoy t1_jdc286t wrote

I liked the style of it. It felt distinctive, although it was the only piece of dystopian YA I read during the time that was super popular. The substance was my real issue. Felt very 'baby's first revolution.' Didn't explore the material conditions enough to do anything beyond introduce kids to the general rebel mindset. Is the capital full of decadent coastal elitists keeping the real country folk down, or are they the capitalist class exploring the panem proletariat? The moment you answer that question, you cut your audience in half.

1

Objective-Switch-823 t1_jdc285y wrote

Mine is maybe a bit more harsh than your way, though I do utilize half stars in my reviews.

5 - as good/loved it as much as my favourite ever book/series 4 - very good/enjoyed it tremendously 3 - it was alright. Don't necessarily regret the experience but will not remember the plot/book itself in a few months 2 - not that enjoyable honestly. Maybe a few good scenes/chapters 1 - there is nothing I enjoyed/appreciated about this book. I might remember it solely because of the lack of enjoyment I had while reading

0 stars(unrated) - giving it a rating felt inappropriate. Usually reserved for very touchy/sensitive memoirs or extremely long short story collections where a single score is just not viable.

6

Lopsided-Animator758 t1_jdc0bkf wrote

Psalms 137:9 reads "Happy he shall be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones."

Numbers 31:17-18 "Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves."

Let the Bible speak for itself.

Edited to add second verse

30