Recent comments in /f/books
wazzy360 t1_jdc5m6y wrote
Reply to Appreciating the Hunger Games by Friesandmayo2665
Katniss’ ending still sticks with me. In all ways it seems “happy” but it’s pretty clear she hasn’t really gotten over her trauma. Thought it was a pretty courageous way to end a YA series.
bucket_brigade t1_jdc5kkg wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
5 if there really is no competition, 4 if it was really good, 1 otherwise
pensieve64 OP t1_jdc5ik1 wrote
Reply to comment by plauderi in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
I agree, half or quarter stars like on StoryGraph would definitely give more leeway. When you say you do research, does this include other Goodreads reviews?
WalidfromMorocco t1_jdc4u50 wrote
Reply to comment by pensieve64 in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
I only give it 1 star if the reason I didn't finish it was because it's bad. But if I stop reading it because I realize the story is not for me or it's not my preferred genre, then I just don't rate it at all.
Pornthrowaway78 t1_jdc4qn1 wrote
Reply to comment by uncreativemonkey in I picked up Wool, and couldn’t put it down. by fn0000rd
I read the first one very quickly, bought the rest, read one chapter and never picked it up again. Can't remember why, but there was something lost between one and two.
glootech t1_jdc4pl8 wrote
Reply to comment by pensieve64 in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
Not the person who commented first, but I use the same system. If I didn't like a book that was well written, I use 1 star because, well, I didn't like it. It doesn't mean that this was the worst book in world, it just wasn't for my taste.
Ollivete t1_jdc4ivd wrote
Reply to comment by pensieve64 in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
i just checked and apparently after the redesign it doesn't appear anymore when you hover the stars. i have changed to storygraph about a year ago.
i just rate it for myself. if it's a revolutionary book at the time of publishing i'll throw in an extra star or two for their contribution to literature even if i hated it
pensieve64 OP t1_jdc45sm wrote
Reply to comment by WalidfromMorocco in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
I don’t rate DNFs as I don’t feel it’s fair if I haven’t read most of the book to give it a rating. Do you have to read a certain amount before you rate it a 1?
pensieve64 OP t1_jdc42d8 wrote
Reply to comment by Ollivete in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
I didn’t know Goodreads had set out recommendations. What do you do for books that are well written but not your taste? It feels weird for me to give it a low response if I just don’t like it for some reason
blue_bayou_blue t1_jdc3z4n wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
To be honest my rating criteria isn't consistent, and I've gone back to change ratings a few times. I also use Storygraph which allows half and quarter stars, which makes the decision more complicated. That said, here's my general method:
5 stars - my absolute favourites, books that I both really enjoyed reading and are objectively well written.
4.5 stars - books I loved but had some flaw that keeps it from being a 5. Usually, books I had a blast reading but some part of plot or worldbuilding fell apart once I thought about it some more.
4 stars - books that are fairly enjoyable and engaging. Most books I finish are here.
3.5 stars - books I loved parts of. eg an excellent book with a disappointing ending, or one that has an amazing character or plot twist but is otherwise meh.
3 stars - OK books, that I liked but didn't make much of an impression. Also, books that I recognise are well written, but aren't for me.
2 stars - books I struggled to get though. Interesting enough characters or subject matter that I wanted to finish the book, but boring / repetitive / actively frustrating.
1 star - books that are objectively bad, that I did not enjoy. Has only happened a few times - a local history book that was plain inaccurate, an obnoxious celebrity memoir.
pensieve64 OP t1_jdc3ywd wrote
Reply to comment by InejandKaz in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
Pretty similar to me!
plauderi t1_jdc3yod wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
I would actually appreciate it if it were possible to give half stars, many five star reviews of mine would probably be more like 4.5.
5 - loved it, could not stop reading/listening to it, would recommend it without doubts
4 - liked it, enjoyed it a lot, but not quite as thrilling / absorbing
3 - just ok
2 - part of it was enjoyable, but generally did not like it, probably took me longer to finish when I am reading multiple books at once
1 - absolutely hated it, considered stopping reading (I try not to DNF)
My average rating is 4.08, but I tend to do a lot of research before picking up a book, that keeps disappointments to a minimum.
WalidfromMorocco t1_jdc3x21 wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
1 star - It was so bad that I didn't finish it.
2 - I didn't like it that much but still finished it.
3 - It was okay, but not something I might recommend to people.
4 - Liked it a lot and would recommend.
5 - I will swear by it.
Ollivete t1_jdc3ub6 wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
i use what goodreads themselves use
1 star – didn’t like it
2 stars – it was OK
3 stars – liked it
4 stars – really liked it
5 stars – it was amazing
InejandKaz t1_jdc3mrn wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
5 stars: I loved it and will reread it.
4 stars: Great book but i would not read again / loved it overall but had some boring parts.
3 stars: It was ok but nothing stood out in a good or bad way / good book but bad ending / good but forgetable.
2 stars: Had some good parts or beginning but was bad overall / boring but good written / good story but dragging and badly written.
1 star: dnf book / badly written / whole book was boring / nothing was good about it
zedatkinszed t1_jdc3fz0 wrote
Just to underline exactly who they are they say "make our country great".
And MAGA heads get so offended when called out on their violent/terroistic BS.
Your country is screwed
Razorbackalpha t1_jdc2wp4 wrote
Reply to Do you give books to people? by BwanaAzungu
I give a lot of my fiction to my little siblings and most of my political science to my dad. It's a nice way to bond with family
Objective-Switch-823 t1_jdc2mb6 wrote
Reply to comment by pensieve64 in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
Oh yeah, I also don't usually rate DNFs unless I somehow got well over halfway through
pensieve64 OP t1_jdc2hge wrote
Reply to comment by Objective-Switch-823 in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
This is closer to the way my friend ranks things. The unrated is interesting; I can see why you’d take that approach for books on sensitive topics. I don’t rate DNFs as I don’t feel it’s fair, b it everything else I generally rate
LamppostBoy t1_jdc286t wrote
Reply to Appreciating the Hunger Games by Friesandmayo2665
I liked the style of it. It felt distinctive, although it was the only piece of dystopian YA I read during the time that was super popular. The substance was my real issue. Felt very 'baby's first revolution.' Didn't explore the material conditions enough to do anything beyond introduce kids to the general rebel mindset. Is the capital full of decadent coastal elitists keeping the real country folk down, or are they the capitalist class exploring the panem proletariat? The moment you answer that question, you cut your audience in half.
Objective-Switch-823 t1_jdc285y wrote
Reply to How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
Mine is maybe a bit more harsh than your way, though I do utilize half stars in my reviews.
5 - as good/loved it as much as my favourite ever book/series 4 - very good/enjoyed it tremendously 3 - it was alright. Don't necessarily regret the experience but will not remember the plot/book itself in a few months 2 - not that enjoyable honestly. Maybe a few good scenes/chapters 1 - there is nothing I enjoyed/appreciated about this book. I might remember it solely because of the lack of enjoyment I had while reading
0 stars(unrated) - giving it a rating felt inappropriate. Usually reserved for very touchy/sensitive memoirs or extremely long short story collections where a single score is just not viable.
durgadas t1_jdc0uqu wrote
Fuck Zombies. The Moron Apocalypse is coming.
Lopsided-Animator758 t1_jdc0bkf wrote
Reply to comment by searchneptune in 5 N.Y. Schools Evacuated After Bomb Threats Over LGBTQ+ Book by wdcmsnbcgay
Psalms 137:9 reads "Happy he shall be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones."
Numbers 31:17-18 "Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves."
Let the Bible speak for itself.
Edited to add second verse
Lopsided-Animator758 t1_jdbzrak wrote
Reply to comment by BlakRainbow1991 in 5 N.Y. Schools Evacuated After Bomb Threats Over LGBTQ+ Book by wdcmsnbcgay
Christian jihadists.
plauderi t1_jdc5puu wrote
Reply to comment by pensieve64 in How do you rate your books on Goodreads? by pensieve64
Yes, I look mainly at Goodreads reviews (or Audible if it's an audio book). I feel like anything with a avg rating above 4 is worth reading (if you are into the genre of course).