Recent comments in /f/books

somesignificantotter t1_jdamgpy wrote

I read wool, greatly enjoyed it, and swiftly bought the sequels. However quit about a third of the way through the second book. The dystopian start with all the backdoor political government deals just felt a little too much like real life to continue. Maybe someday I'll pick it back up again.

1

Autarch_Kade t1_jdalt3y wrote

Book 1 is amazing. Book 2 is 90% boring investigation that leads nowhere, followed by 10 pages of crazy action and interesting sci-fi when it abruptly ends unresolved. Book 3 is weird but almost a rehash of how book 3 was laid out, and you still won't be satisfied if you wanted to learn a lot about what's happening.

2

rafaelthecoonpoon t1_jdahhj1 wrote

Read them late because they were cheap when I first got a Kindle and ended up also buying the graphic novel adaptation. It actually got me back into reading for fun and explicitly sci-fi fantasy dystopian type stuff that I hadn't read in years. Thanks wool

2

Bamuhgirl t1_jdag9r3 wrote

The level of excitement I have for this to be a series!! Y’all just made my day. These books are amazing. They have all stuck with me. Wish I could re-read them all for the first time. Also finished all three in a couple days!

1

RedolentPassages t1_jdafmcg wrote

I could very easily picture a Philomena Cunk interview on this

" so did the books make the bomb threats, did they leave some sort of letter?"

Interviewee: " no they were made because of the books"

" well then who made them"

" a group of people people who didn't like the books"

" well that's odd isn't it"

240

j-live t1_jdadlfr wrote

Rarely but if I do it's either Siddhartha or Tao of Poo. Generally to friends and family already interested in eastern philosophy.

I have given a Vonnegut here and there as well.

2

mrnewtons t1_jdadbw0 wrote

Come to think of it, just to add fuel to the fire, Stargate SG-1's, which released in 1997, entire premise of the show was that the main antagonists (the Goa'uld) had enslaved most of the galaxy by keeping education low and using advanced Tech to make planets think they were literal gods.

​

It's... it's just such an old idea that it's kinda like seasoning a chicken with just salt and expecting me to be impressed.

​

That's maybe too harsh but you get my point I think.

3

[deleted] t1_jdacn73 wrote

I did this one Christmas. My family politely left all the books stacked by the tree. We never spoke of it again. All of the books were personally chosen for them.

I haven’t done it since. I now give them Starbucks or target gift cards (they are big on local coffee shops, before you ask). I’m a book reader in a family of movie people.

2

mrnewtons t1_jdabwr9 wrote

Sci-fi is my thing, but I still kinda had the same opinion. I saw the "twist" coming from miles and miles away.

​

Like with much sci-fi that hits the mainstream, it tends to be an idea that fans have been playing around with for a long time. "The Outside isn't what the claimed it to be! We've been deceived by technology we don't understand!"

​

Pretty sure that's the plot of more than one Trek episode.

​

I also just... couldn't get into the world building. I tried. Silos = Vault Tech Vaults, super secret IT group, dystopian government for reasons....

​

On paper I should've adored this series, and it's difficult for me to find good reasons it didn't grip me. It just... didn't.

7

LeoMarius t1_jdaalj5 wrote

Only if I know they'd like it, or if it's of particular importance to me.

As a librarian, I'm better at picking out books for people than most, but still it's never perfect.

3