Recent comments in /f/books
[deleted] t1_jat89um wrote
[removed]
zoomiepaws t1_jat6sul wrote
Lenny Bruce!
GaimanitePkat t1_jat6r9v wrote
It honestly makes me nauseous that "unalive" has made it into people's regular rhetoric outside of TikTok, where it apparently originated.
BuddyOZ t1_jat5jwo wrote
Reply to comment by Savannah_Henderson in Museum issues appeal to save famed "Misty of Chincoteague" ranch from being sold to developers by ZebZ
I would say it was inspired by an actual horse and the place it came from. The real story is much different.
10_Virtues t1_jat51b4 wrote
Censorship, Forced inclusion and political correctness often meets more retaliation than simply leaving them be. Over time people change and usually for the better when they can decide for themselves rather than being told what a terrible person you are for having different views.
I know a few ex racist because they made that conclusion on their own and realized it wasn’t what they felt but was lead to think.
Sleightholme2 t1_jat38qh wrote
Archive link to avoid paywall: https://archive.is/iPQ2D
LadnavIV t1_jat1pnp wrote
Reply to comment by snoman18x in Banning Words Won’t Make the World More Just - The Atlantic by vaikrunta
This is the meaning of the phrase euphemism treadmill
redditknees t1_jaswu6c wrote
Reply to comment by snoman18x in Banning Words Won’t Make the World More Just - The Atlantic by vaikrunta
Oh the irony.
[deleted] t1_jasucyb wrote
Reply to comment by Headless_Grammarian in Banning Words Won’t Make the World More Just - The Atlantic by vaikrunta
[deleted]
QueensOfTheNoKnowAge t1_jasserv wrote
Paywall. Euphemism treadmill
[deleted] t1_jasqvv4 wrote
BEST_POOP_U_EVER_HAD t1_jasnxy6 wrote
Reply to comment by Beginning-Classic219 in I'm too stupid to understand/analyze "The Stranger" by Camus by baratoyoso
I do think that it’s harder to get ‘meaning’ from some texts through audiobooks, unless you are in the habit of constantly pausing and rewinding. With printed books, it’s easier and more natural to pause and dwell on something you just read, re-read the previous sentence or paragraph, flip back a few pages, make a note or too. This kind of ‘active’ reading is often helpful for understanding some books.
I am not saying it’s impossible to ‘actively’ listen to an audiobook, I think it is just less convenient (especially since many people put them on while doing other things). Likewise, not all printed book reading is ‘active,’ or even the default way of reading.
Don’t be afraid to try again but also don’t be too tough on yourself :)
Headless_Grammarian t1_jasnxt6 wrote
It's trying to make codes for what words can be used in order to separate us (the good people) from them (the bad people). And it will have classist effects - the people who are educated at higher institutions will be able to sneer at the uneducated who still use words like urban and the poor.
LordofdeKeems t1_jasknc2 wrote
Banning words is foolish. It's editing out the bad to hopefully just picture the good.
We don't learn and progress by closing our eyes and ears to the bad. You would think we would have learned that over the last few thousand years.
AnarkittenSurprise t1_jask6gg wrote
Banning words is foolish.
Being thoughtful about how our words are interpreted by others, and building a culture around colloquialisms, slang, or new expressions that accurately reflect our message AND is recieved accurately by the person on the other end, is important though.
Language can upset, exclude, or make others feel dehumanized. If that's not our intent, it's worth investing in making sure that's not our impact.
If harming, exclusion, dehumanization, etc. is someone's intent, then I support them communicating that way all they want. That helps me and others understand what we're dealing with.
Lastly, people who hide behind "that's not what I meant" when they either know that it's how they are being understood, or don't care about how they're being understood, have a very poor and short-timed excuse imo.
blue_twidget t1_jasi7nw wrote
Reply to comment by kalysti in Museum issues appeal to save famed "Misty of Chincoteague" ranch from being sold to developers by ZebZ
Could you DM me the link for it?
jesse-taylor t1_jasdo3m wrote
It's a seriously harmful symptom of toxic positivity, a modern disease that is destroying much of our ability to honestly communicate with one another especially in the USA.
king_shid_of_fud t1_jasbp6z wrote
Reply to comment by JhymnMusic in Banning Words Won’t Make the World More Just - The Atlantic by vaikrunta
Yep. And the commenters are lapping it up
snoman18x t1_jasbfox wrote
I couldn't finish the article because of a pay wall, so it may say this.
I wish I could find the article, but I've read another article that says that words are only symbols to which meaning is assigned. And that banning offensive words or language for the replacement of new "ok" words only cause those words to have the offensive connotation attached to them or for new words to be created.
And that changing the language does nothing to stop the hate surrounding them.
JhymnMusic t1_jas7zkz wrote
I am completely convinced it's all advertising tactics.
ModernNancyDrew t1_jas5xvx wrote
Reply to comment by Gobergoober in Museum issues appeal to save famed "Misty of Chincoteague" ranch from being sold to developers by ZebZ
I wrote Marguerite Henry all the time as a kid and she always answered me. I still have her letters. It was her book, "Mustang: Wild Spirit of the West" that inspired me to adopt a Mustang as an adult and Brighty of the Grand Canyon inspired me to get a miniature donkey.
Electron_Spin t1_jas3ckf wrote
Reply to comment by mosehalpert in Museum issues appeal to save famed "Misty of Chincoteague" ranch from being sold to developers by ZebZ
Imagine caring more about preserving some unused ranch land over homes for people to live in.
[deleted] t1_jas2pg9 wrote
moeru_gumi t1_jas1m5n wrote
Reply to comment by kalysti in Museum issues appeal to save famed "Misty of Chincoteague" ranch from being sold to developers by ZebZ
God, same
iamleeg t1_jat9p4j wrote
Reply to comment by snoman18x in Banning Words Won’t Make the World More Just - The Atlantic by vaikrunta
It doesn’t, but that’s a great point that it should also say. It says that text written in inclusive English says way less than text written in English, and ironically alienates the reader from the very characters it is trying to include.