Recent comments in /f/books

tillerman35 t1_jaekop6 wrote

Faulkner should be read aloud. And it's best when read in a genteel Southern accent (think Kevin Spacy in "Midnight in The Garden of Good and Evil.")

I remember reading somewhere the Faulkner was extremely particular about word choice and phrasing. Every sentence is a complete thought- a statement, if you will. There's a part of "Go Down Moses" where the narrator repeatedly says "And McCaslin" - if you don't say that out loud, ponderously, you miss the impact altogether.

Faulkner's writing makes you imagine the author himself reading the book aloud to you, even when you're doing the reading. Or at least, that's been my experience.

2

Starlit-Sage OP t1_jaekkhy wrote

Ahh okay, I can see that. It's actually in first person, from Miri's perspective, but there isn't a chance for "I" yet because she's describing what Leah is saying and doing here at the beginning. Alternating chapters are from Leah's perspective in the submarine.

I don't have my copy next to me, but I think the first line is italicized and it's supposed to be something Leah just said.... I think "unstill" is also italicized to show that it's the word Leah says.

2

Starlit-Sage OP t1_jaeje38 wrote

I'm so sorry your birthday sucked! If you get it, I really hope you enjoy it!

It does feel very "cosmic horror" in that sublime sense of "unknowability" at the bottom of the sea....

The PTSD isn't overt, but it definitely feels like an allegory because Leah experienced this traumatic event and she can't go back to her normal life, and no one in her normal life can understand what she experienced.

2

HumanOrion t1_jaeirbv wrote

The fact that Hannibal Rising came after the fact makes this lack of consistency more unforgivable, not less.

The fact that Red Dragon (and the other books) existed, and presented a fleshed out profile of Hannibal should have been taken into account when writing Hannibal Rising.

6

Tre_akl OP t1_jaeh6bt wrote

Reply to comment by EricDiazDotd in Writers replaced by AI? by Tre_akl

You are the first one here to think so, so thank you for the answer. You should not feel discouraged from writing because of it. It could be used for the benefit of yours (you know generating names and tasks like that) but I don’t think that those chats could come up with original ideas using imagination. I hope not, don’t know how these works or gonna work in the future but if it should happened we would be living the scariest sci-fi ever.

2

Tre_akl OP t1_jaeegmz wrote

Reply to comment by FunnelCopy in Writers replaced by AI? by Tre_akl

I did not say I’m worried about writers being replaced, I just asked on peoples opinions if that could even ever happened. I’m not part of copywriting subs so I just asked here and bunch of people kindly answered me. Only thing boring here is you and your zero value answer.

1

Sisyphean_Love t1_jaeedx4 wrote

Maybe start with some novellas to get a feel of what you enjoy. If you love it great. If you hate it at least you didn’t waste much time. I’ll recommend some shorter books for you.

Murderbot Diaries by Martha Wells. There are four books total and each one is roughly 200 pages or less. It’s about a cyborg that acts as security for humans and ends up hacking itself to have free will.

Singing Hills Cycle by Nghi Vo. A cleric goes around the country recording history from oral stories.

Annihilation by Jeff Vandermeer. An area known as Area X is said to be a pristine habitat, but there are mysterious happenings effecting the people who venture in the area.

Comfort Me with Apples by Catherynne Valente.

Maybe even try audiobooks. Some books I feel are better if they’re listened to. Good luck finding something you like.

1

Tre_akl OP t1_jaectk0 wrote

Reply to comment by StepfordMisfit in Writers replaced by AI? by Tre_akl

That was also my first thought. Even when the AI “read” all the world literature I can’t imagine some set of data to come up with deep world-building, authentic characters and their connections just by kind of mixing them together.

1

OkLead9868 t1_jaecfls wrote

But that’s the thing. People are complex. You cannot look at another person and really know who they are or what is going on in their mind. There are people who act happy and nice and one day commit suicide. The human mind is complex and our interactions, motivations ideas that come along with that are complex. I think he writes characters at more extremes to represent ideas more than purely real people because it allows you to see what motivates people. It gives a different perspective by him writing like that. It makes you think outside the box.

5