Recent comments in /f/books

agajabigaba t1_j9zgzym wrote

I, too, wasn’t crazy about Foundation but I don’t think it was bad literature. I actually thought it was well written because the author was able to get me to understand the complexity of psychohistory”.

1

Yanowknow t1_j9zgncu wrote

TBF,, your example is more a political interpretation than an urban legend. A lot of high school freshman classes use the Wizard of Oz as an introduction to allegories. It can be viewed as a metaphor for the social,political, and economic events of America in the 1890s. I believe that's what you're referencing. An urban legend about the movie, for example, would be that one of the munchkins hung himself from a tree and can be seen briefly in the film.

2

LordXak t1_j9zg0wy wrote

Asimov is an ideas guy, his characters are all cardboard cutouts. That being said Foundation is terrible and it only gets worse as the series goes on, and on, and on. Every book ends with a Deus Ex Machina moment where the super smart scientists pull some shit out of their asses to prevail over the space barbarians. There's much better sci-fi from the same era.

1

Cobra52 t1_j9zfi8z wrote

Anna's death is great, but I would argue the chapter where she finally gives into Vronsky at Princess Betsy's is greater. There's so much tension in the will they won't they, and everyone knows that the moment she commits to him theres no turning back. Her death scene is amazing as well, but I felt pretty miserable about Anna by that point. She was a completely ruined woman which made it difficult reading through her sections, compared to the person she once was. Her suicide feels inevitable and ties up nicely with when she met Vronsky, but it was just so depressing.

6

Grace_Alcock t1_j9zelsf wrote

I read the first fifty pages and found it a tiresome repetition of tradition realist international relation theory, which doesn’t hold up well under systematic hypothesis testing, so the “this is the profound nature of things” tone put me off. This is my academic specialty, so it just made me roll my eyes.

But I have certainly enjoyed others of his books.

−2

Tanagrabelle t1_j9ze7mb wrote

I treat the first book as a collection of short stories that tie together. The thread connecting them? The survival and gradual thriving of the Foundation. Problems with the stories: as a woman, the fact that women weren't even NPCs. (sort of a joke)

Many sci fi apocalyptic stories are just like this. A healthy community with decent resources, isolated by distance, and how they have to deal with the threat of the neighbors now that law and order have broken down. Granted, most of the time they're set in a country, or even an island on Earth.

3

CrazyCatLady108 t1_j9zdnf8 wrote

No plain text spoilers allowed. Please use the format below and reply to this comment once you've made the edit, to have your comment reinstated.

Place >! !< around the text you wish to hide. You will need to do this for each new paragraph. Like this:

&gt;!The Wolf ate Grandma!&lt;

Click to reveal spoiler.

>!The Wolf ate Grandma!<

1