Recent comments in /f/books

prettyfacebasketcase t1_j9yqiun wrote

I find myself having thoughts about this about a number of different hobbies. I try to think of myself if I was living in the '70s or '80s. I wouldn't worry about how often I need to be doing something for it to "count". Because I wouldn't be inundated with other people seemingly doing it constantly everyday. I would just know how to enjoy things.

Obviously I'm over simplifying a different time period with rose colored glasses, but I do think there was a simplicity before social media made keeping up with the Joneses explode.

10

VengefulMight OP t1_j9yqf37 wrote

There will probably be a grain of truth in that. Most witches accused were women, but most of those who accused them were also women.

So, say a mother loses her baby in a miscarriage and the midwife herself happens to be childless. It is very easy for her to suspect that a jealous midwife has done something sinister.

6

yeetedhaws t1_j9ypfzc wrote

Jane Austen's works were actually pretty fast paced for the time period, the writing norms of that time are just completely different then what we see today. You've probably already seen a few changes in writing style in your life time (I know a lot of new books during the 2000s-early 2010s had text lingo written in, now that's considered out dated). The fact that you can see flashes of brilliance even though her books are centuries old show that she was a great writer.

It seems you're confusing good literature with personal preference. I personally don't enjoy Faulkner or Steinbeck (hated east of Eden and grapes of wrath, as I lay dying was super morbid and a waste of time for me) but they are inherently outstanding authors because of how their books impacted people when they were published and how they continue to be relevant to people today (very few people know what the great depression was like but people can still get lost in a pilgrimage of a family trying to survive a hard time).

Aismov's foundation might have some antiquated writing techniques or prose but try to listen to how other people are reading and understanding it. They might point out something that proves why it's an enduring piece of literature. If people didn't gleam something from it, it would have been forgotten and would not be considered the classic people deem it to be.

22