Recent comments in /f/books
siuknowwhatImean OP t1_j93sk8w wrote
Reply to comment by DeedTheInky in Is Frankenstein responsible for the murders his creation committed? by siuknowwhatImean
That’s true. Even though he acts like a completely new person I could argue that I didn’t create his brain - Is a doctor responsible for the crimes that a patient performs post-resuscitation?
[deleted] t1_j93simq wrote
Reply to comment by DeedTheInky in Is Frankenstein responsible for the murders his creation committed? by siuknowwhatImean
[deleted]
albertossic t1_j93s5kg wrote
Reply to comment by Rusalka-rusalka in Is Frankenstein responsible for the murders his creation committed? by siuknowwhatImean
How can you read the novel without sympathising with Frankenstein? The whole story is about how he tries to do something huge and then everyone he loves gets brutally murdered
albertossic t1_j93ryt2 wrote
Reply to comment by jawnbaejaeger in Is Frankenstein responsible for the murders his creation committed? by siuknowwhatImean
He did not 'let her hang' what are you talking about
siuknowwhatImean OP t1_j93rtq4 wrote
Reply to comment by Snoo57923 in Is Frankenstein responsible for the murders his creation committed? by siuknowwhatImean
It’s given
[deleted] t1_j93rrvb wrote
[deleted]
siuknowwhatImean OP t1_j93rkqg wrote
Reply to comment by Varathien in Is Frankenstein responsible for the murders his creation committed? by siuknowwhatImean
Thing is, I didn’t treat my monster like crap, society does. The only thing you could argue I did do is let him escape to society in a vulnerable state
champdo t1_j93r3h8 wrote
Please sir a crumb of oppression
siuknowwhatImean OP t1_j93r1zk wrote
Reply to comment by EchoedJolts in Is Frankenstein responsible for the murders his creation committed? by siuknowwhatImean
fr
Tall-Display-8219 t1_j93qybp wrote
A private company publishing edited versions of fictional books is not the same as a totalitarian government seeking to alter peoples perception of reality by altering historical documents.
Consider the following: people are not being forced to read the new versions, the old versions are not being banned or outlawed by any government, this is just one publisher, the edits are minor and don't fundamentally change the stories, the books are fictional anyway so never represented the "truth" about anything to begin with.
So no... its not even remotely the same thing.
siuknowwhatImean OP t1_j93qwwp wrote
Reply to comment by miss_scarlet_letter in Is Frankenstein responsible for the murders his creation committed? by siuknowwhatImean
we assigned ‘expert’ roles like psychologist and biologist. im probably going to bribe the psychologist
idk-lol-1234 t1_j93qrp9 wrote
To put it simply: You missed the entire point of the series.
reddit455 t1_j93qfyl wrote
i don't think you appreciate what Orwell probably had in mind.
​
North Korea has the closest thing to IRL "Ministry of Truth"
this is the kind of truth their ministry provides
​
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_in_North_Korea
Paintings on the walls of the Sinchon Museum of American War Atrocities depict alleged atrocities carried out by American soldiers during the Korean War.
​
South Korea is often depicted as a place of dangerous racial contamination.[27]
North Korean propaganda often invokes Koreans as the purest of races, with a mystical bond with the natural beauty of the landscape
​
Romance is often depicted in stories as being triggered solely by the person's model citizenship, as when a beautiful woman is unattractive until a man learns she volunteered to work at a potato farm .[34]
leilahlove1996 t1_j93qekc wrote
Haven’t read these books since middle school but I loved them so much I’m naming my newborn to be Violet.
Was thinking of re-reading to refresh, but based on your stand point maybe not… lol
siuknowwhatImean OP t1_j93pqim wrote
Reply to comment by not_mig in Is Frankenstein responsible for the murders his creation committed? by siuknowwhatImean
In the book, I was overwhelmed by the physical and mental exertion of my experiment so I took a nap. Just as a pregnant woman is probably not able-bodied as soon as she gives birth, would it also be negligence on her part if she fell asleep while her baby escaped?
reddit455 t1_j93plce wrote
not sure I understand...
​
you're suggesting that this
>destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered.
​
is equivalent to this?
​
Augustus Gloop now ‘enormous’ instead of ‘fat’
​
it's not false, the book is not rewritten, (a word is being replaced - with a synonym), Augustus is still a "big boy", is still named Agustus... and no dates have changed.
​
are they vastly different than the version you remember?
​
Roald Dahl books rewritten to remove language deemed offensive
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/feb/18/roald-dahl-books-rewritten-to-remove-language-deemed-offensive
​
In The Twits, Mrs Twit is no longer “ugly and beastly” but just “beastly”.
​
In The Witches, a paragraph explaining that witches are bald beneath their wigs ends with the new line: “There are plenty of other reasons why women might wear wigs and there is certainly nothing wrong with that.”
​
> but personally I can't ignore their similarity in light of the recent events
i don't put the Ministry of Truth in the same league as using a different word for fat.
[deleted] t1_j93jh9j wrote
[deleted]
ImprobableGerund t1_j93i471 wrote
Reply to comment by AggravatingStudy2084 in My thoughts on “A Series of Unfortunate Events.” by AggravatingStudy2084
It gets crazier if you keep reading the series. Olaf starts to make more sense and your start to empathize with him and the kids start making questionable choices and start seeming to be more like the bad guys. There is evil, there are people that make no sense, and everyone thinks their bad choices are justified. It is unfortunate, but sometimes so is life.
Bokbreath t1_j93i3uz wrote
Reply to comment by brickmaster32000 in Why are HUMANS so predictable? by LegalCrook
You can - and that would also be correct. Whether it is useful to anyone is another question
CrazyCatLady108 t1_j93gl2b wrote
Reply to Why are HUMANS so predictable? by LegalCrook
Discussion is the goal
Do not post shallow content. All posts must be directly book related, informative, and discussion focused
HippoBot9000 t1_j93g626 wrote
Reply to comment by brickmaster32000 in Why are HUMANS so predictable? by LegalCrook
HIPPOBOT 9000 v 3.0 FOUND A HIPPO. 5,876,376 COMMENTS SEARCHED. 171 HIPPOS FOUND. YOUR COMMENT CONTAINS THE WORD HIPPO.
brickmaster32000 t1_j93g4yd wrote
Reply to comment by Bokbreath in Why are HUMANS so predictable? by LegalCrook
That is just a result of how you choose to catergorize things. I could also just as easily say that all stories fall into only two categories, stories about hippos and stories that arent about hippos.
hannahbaba t1_j93g0dq wrote
Reply to comment by DarthSalyavin in My thoughts on “A Series of Unfortunate Events.” by AggravatingStudy2084
It has a very quiet, semi-tragic conclusion that I appreciate a lot more as an adult than I did as a kid.
brickmaster32000 t1_j93fw5t wrote
Reply to Why are HUMANS so predictable? by LegalCrook
Chess has only 6 types of pieces with absolutely no variations among the same pieces. Each piece has only ever has a limited number of possible paths, 27 at max but on average only 11. Yet after only 5 turns for both players there are 69,352,859,712,417 possible outcomes.
ShinyBlueChocobo t1_j93sy5i wrote
Reply to My thoughts on “A Series of Unfortunate Events.” by AggravatingStudy2084
I read them all last year and a lot like the Oz books I really like them up to a point and then they drop off hard. For ASoUE it was everything after the Hostile Hospital and for Oz it was everything after book 3