Soccer mommy, feeble little horse, mannequin.pussy, and poison run have all played as of this post. So for the next few nights there's still Mac Demarco and Waxahatchee on the table. For some reason I feel like Waxa will be Valentine's day

Lake Roland has a 5 mile up and back from the light rail parking lot to Falls.

Lot to Boardwalk, up hill around circle to trail down to light rail tracks. Trail runs next to reservoir to Falls road. Mostly wooded except for park.

Patapsco Avalon area and McKeldin area, Gunpowder Falls off Hartford Rd, and Great Falls the DC side (tho this one is at the DC-VA border and is a bit of a drive)

For a hike? Go to Killgore Falls, Cunningham Falls, Leakin Park, or even around Loch Raven resovoir

Double Rock Park

Cromwell Valley Park, Oregon Ridge, Loch Raven, Cylburn Arboretum

Lake Roland

If you had first hand experience of someone committing domestic violence how would you prove it?

[deleted]

Should I be worried about termites? Lol!

From the geographic center of the city you can hike the Stony Run Trail north to Northern Pkwy with a couple street crossings.

https://www.stonyrun.org/

well to me the question is why does someone have to be called "offended" just because they want to talk about something or point something important out?

who ever said they were offended?

Irvine nature center

Especially for an ant.

Gwynn Falls park had some 30+ years ago, not sure about today.

It should be Tuesday the 14th after 4pm, but if youre making the trip from Hopkins, def call ahead because it sells out fast.

I'd say go with carpenter, so long as you don't have any wooden prosthetics.

I hear what you’re saying, and like I told the OP, I believe you’re coming from a good place.

I just feeling like this is overshooting, and continuing to do so will just delegitimize any real issues this city has with poverty.

[removed]

🐜🐜🐜

Anyway, Patapsco isn’t too far…

https://dnr.maryland.gov/publiclands/pages/central/patapsco.aspx

[removed]

I’m pretty sure any molehill is a mountain.

i think the point is that you are just being way too literal about this in a situation where OP was to me kinda leaning more towards the general idea that the banner was taking a page out of the suns book (paper lol) by just not representing the community. and if its obvious enough for someone to think about and question, its worth talking about. instead OP was kind of just battered around about their question mostly without it ever being answered. and that to me is one of the insidious parts of strucural racism. if we all just figure that what the white people are saying is the same as what other races might say because those are the people that the publication is aimed at and its a general issue, then it just makes an echo chamber for one dominant groups perspectives.

sorry for the crummy formatting but i think im finished with this lil spat, nice talkin to ya!

Right, but the question is why does the article have to feature a bus rider with black skin for you to not be offended?

>How difficult can it be to find a Black person who rides the bus by necessity and not by choice to talk to? Or a Black transit advocate?

What exactly is it that upsets you about this article?

Why does the article have to feature “a black person who rides the bus by necessity and not by choice” for you to understand that the issues described in the article regarding the transit system apply to everyone and anyone who uses the transit system?

Look, I understand you are coming from a good place. As a white person, you don’t want black people to get shit on and all that. We all feel that way.

However, this article isn’t it.

If anything this article is bringing real issues to light that affect “black people that have to ride the bus through necessity,” which is good.

The reason why more “black people ride the bus through necessity” than white people is definitely not an article highlighting very real issues bus riders face…

Right?