Recent comments in /f/baltimore

ElectricStar87 t1_j6nk615 wrote

Yeah I agree — we’re built to support a close to necessary density, but we need hundreds of thousands more people to approach what’s likely needed. It unfortunately becomes a chicken/egg problem with density and infrastructure investment. It’s not an easy problem to solve, sadly.

5

jabbadarth t1_j6niet1 wrote

I work at UMD and years ago they were building a new dorm. The contractor had a big meeting with a bunch of different departments that may be impacted by construction. They spent a few minutes talking about the large crane that would be there for a few months mostly to let people know not to worry if it spins around as it was left unlocked inte totally while not in use to allow it to spin with the wind instead of being locked and adding stress on it. They also said that they make a point of not swinging material over existing buildings but would occasionally have to swing the unladen crane over buildings to pickup materials.

The person who ran the daycare which is next to the dorm basically told them that this was unacceptable because they had kids playing outside there and if that crane fell it would kill them.

I just thought, if that crane falls it doesn't matter if the kids are outside or inside it's crushing them all. Also would it be ok if it was just adults outside and the crane fell?

Like she was legitimately concerned about the placement of a crane because it might fall over and crush kids in daycare.

Not really sure what she thought thy would say to that. Like "shit you're right we need to cancel this project" as if cranes just fall over all the time.

26

SkyeMreddit t1_j6niav6 wrote

The after photo is taken from that bridge (or it’s replacement to maintain the cross street) seen in the middle of the before photo. You can see the same buildings in the background. This makes the rounds on historical building subs making people think that they got rid of the modernist buildings on the left. So it would send the wrong message

2

Dontaskmeaboutnam t1_j6nhf30 wrote

Legal bills rack up quick. She’s already racked up probably a couple hundred billable hours. Probably a couple hundred more to go.

So it’s relative. If she ends up paying $200k + in legal bills that’s an entire year’s salary.

Also is it fair to expect Nick to contribute to the bill?

9

MuffinRat84 t1_j6nh5by wrote

I ran into these people a few years ago at Druid hill park...they are mostly concerned that trains hauling oil and empty oil tankers under their houses and that the trains will be loud in their homes. I then talked to my brother who is an Engineer....they are already transporting oil and empty tankers everyday and also one would expect a new modern not 150 year tunnel would have better sound insulation than the current ones. These people's concerns are completely unfounded.

33

physicallyatherapist t1_j6ngxqi wrote

Regardless of what is built I think there will be disagreements with the details (what is put where and how often) but I really think transit people will want something built regardless. I'm not picky with public transportation. Tram, trolley, light rail, buses, bikes.. bring it all! The issue I get mad about is that a large majority of car people simply cannot wrap their heads around not driving a car and I get sick of the same excuses "where will I park? It's going to be more congested for cars. It's going to hurt businesses if we can't park right in front". Which is all BS. Hell in my other thread the one guy said I was being "polarizing" because I suggested that cars aren't the only ways to get around. Transit people complain about details while car people try to prevent any of it at all from happening and you're right.. I'm not entirely sure how to get through to many

3

BmoreCityDOT OP t1_j6ngwy0 wrote

6

rectalhorror t1_j6nfu7m wrote

Same deal with the Purple Line connecting Silver Spring and Bethesda: locals were decrying the environmental impact and when that didn't work, the Chevy Chase Country Club clutched their pearls at the impact to their historic neighborhood. Also the recent proposal to run a maglev line from DC to Baltimore. Every town in that corridor protested because they'd get no direct benefit from it, which is part of the issue with these nimbys.

14

jabbadarth t1_j6ne31o wrote

One of the signs in the photo says this is a freight project explosives, toxic cargo nuclear waste.

  1. Do they think those things aren't already on the trains that use this tunnel daily now?

  2. Would they rather those things be shipped on trucks?

  3. Fuck fear mongering idiots who throw out shit like nuclear and explosive just to scare people.

62

jabbadarth t1_j6ndrmd wrote

>The plan brings the tunnel right under our houses. Most of the houses in Reservoir Hill were built in the 1900s, and we're very, very concerned about the impact of the drilling that's going to destroy these 100-some-year-old houses," Wright said.

They are just assuming that the boring machines will destroy their homes. This is based, I assume, on fear and nothing else. Tunnels are dug all around the world, all the time and while accidents do occasionally happen in America we have a pretty damn good track record (pun intended) of digging tunnels.

Look at NYC where they just a few years ago extended a line and added new stations under one of the most densely populated cities in the world. No news of entire houses caving in there.

Also saying this is the presidents plan is a bit disingenuous. This has been a project decades in the making. Biden just happened to be the president when it finally got started and funded. Certainly his infrastructure plan helped but lets not act like this was his plan when hundreds of people have worked on this for years.

103

DanteFerris t1_j6ndlx6 wrote

There is also The Gane Haven in Pikesville, a few miles outside of Baltimore if you are situated in NW Baltimore. It's a fun location, decent community, and magic events many days. It's also a partner store

1