Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_j8t6kx4 wrote
Reply to comment by CrateDane in Is blood toxic to neurons ? by AdEnvironmental8339
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8svzxq wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8suxl8 wrote
Reply to Is blood toxic to neurons ? by AdEnvironmental8339
[removed]
Local-Program404 t1_j8sp69c wrote
Reply to comment by Chemomechanics in Does refracting light impart momentum onto the object that is refracting it, for the duration of the refraction? by TheFeshy
Honestly, this made me think of the emdrive from a few years ago. Interesting phenomenon.
Chemomechanics t1_j8snwzw wrote
Reply to comment by Local-Program404 in Does refracting light impart momentum onto the object that is refracting it, for the duration of the refraction? by TheFeshy
The medium plays a part in the momentum transfer, yes.
The net force on a spherical body isn't zero for a single beam because the beam changes shape moving through it, so the refractive details are different on either side.
But for two counterpropagating beams, which is what I used, the left–right forces do balance out, leaving an internal tensile load that stretches a compliant medium. You don't notice this in everyday situations with macroscale objects because they're stiff and the light is weak.
Local-Program404 t1_j8smu6t wrote
Reply to comment by Chemomechanics in Does refracting light impart momentum onto the object that is refracting it, for the duration of the refraction? by TheFeshy
So when the light speeds up when it leaves the medium, where does that come from? The medium? So the net force on the medium is 0 because if gives it back up to the light when it leaves?
CrateDane t1_j8sm4jy wrote
Reply to Is blood toxic to neurons ? by AdEnvironmental8339
Neurons, especially in the CNS (brain/spinal cord), are quite sensitive, and are usually kept in a sheltered environment separated from the blood by the blood-brain barrier. Astrocytes and other glial cells provide a controlled environment for the neurons. They do take nutrients from the blood, but they act as a filter to only let through the right things and in the concentrations that neurons prefer.
Even in other tissues, blood isn't usually supposed to leave the blood vessels, and can cause trouble if it does. Perhaps the easiest to understand is coagulation - if everything's clotted up, that will disrupt whatever else is supposed to be happening in that tissue. There are also immune molecules which tend to get activated and cause inflammation when outside blood vessels. Inflammation generally interferes with regular tissue function, and CNS neurons are particularly sensitive to it.
Blood also contains higher concentrations of stuff like iron that would damage neurons.
Mad_Jax77 OP t1_j8se157 wrote
Reply to comment by CrustalTrudger in Why is the Big Island so much bigger than the other Hawaiian islands? by Mad_Jax77
Thank you for the detailed reply and follow up! It's unfortunate none of us will be around in 5 million years to see how the islands continue to change.
[deleted] t1_j8sawoq wrote
Reply to Is blood toxic to neurons ? by AdEnvironmental8339
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8samk1 wrote
Reply to Is blood toxic to neurons ? by AdEnvironmental8339
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8s97j2 wrote
Reply to Is blood toxic to neurons ? by AdEnvironmental8339
[removed]
Chemomechanics t1_j8s6uup wrote
Reply to comment by thickener in Does refracting light impart momentum onto the object that is refracting it, for the duration of the refraction? by TheFeshy
No one thing is decelerating or accelerating. The photon–matter interaction propagates slower than c.
See the discussion here and the links within, for example.
CrustalTrudger t1_j8s5ruo wrote
Reply to comment by thiosk in Why is the Big Island so much bigger than the other Hawaiian islands? by Mad_Jax77
Yep, it's even got a name, Maui Nui and included Kaho‘olawe as well (and some bits that are no longer islands). The general concept has been around for a while (e.g., Stearns & Macdonald, 1942) and there's been a variety of efforts to "reconstruct" what this island would have looked like (e.g., Price & Fisk, 2004). In detail, the Price and Fisk reconstruction suggests that Maui Nui at its maximum extent was actually larger than the "Big" Island is today.
[deleted] t1_j8s4lji wrote
Reply to Is blood toxic to neurons ? by AdEnvironmental8339
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8s3iq2 wrote
Reply to Is blood toxic to neurons ? by AdEnvironmental8339
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8s2kiq wrote
[removed]
thickener t1_j8rw9kz wrote
Reply to comment by Chemomechanics in Does refracting light impart momentum onto the object that is refracting it, for the duration of the refraction? by TheFeshy
This answer got me wondering, if a photon could somehow enter an atmosphere, pass through water, then head back into the vacuum of space, does it “re-accelerate” to “full” lightspeed? How does that work?
thiosk t1_j8rtray wrote
Reply to comment by CrustalTrudger in Why is the Big Island so much bigger than the other Hawaiian islands? by Mad_Jax77
from the bathymetry is it conceivable that the maui/moloka'i/lana'i trio was once a single island that eroded/subside into separate features?
[deleted] OP t1_j8rsu9d wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why do some surfactants lather while others don't? by [deleted]
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_j8rspar wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why do some surfactants lather while others don't? by [deleted]
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8rrd0h wrote
[removed]
Chemomechanics t1_j8rqj4n wrote
Reply to comment by juansinmiedo in Does refracting light impart momentum onto the object that is refracting it, for the duration of the refraction? by TheFeshy
As I recall, the energy is split between absorption, reflection, and refraction. The frequency of the light wave stays the same; its speed changes. Remember that we’re talking about light interacting with matter, rather than lone photons in a vacuum.
[deleted] t1_j8rpuiu wrote
Chemomechanics t1_j8rnzx4 wrote
Reply to comment by nicemike40 in Does refracting light impart momentum onto the object that is refracting it, for the duration of the refraction? by TheFeshy
Thank you! I always forget to escape the parentheses on Reddit.
nicholsz t1_j8td4oa wrote
Reply to Is blood toxic to neurons ? by AdEnvironmental8339
Yes, blood is toxic to neurons. We have a blood-brain barrier that only lets some things through (either passively if they're small enough like oxygen or alcohol, or actively for bigger molecules).
The brain sits in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rather than blood.
As for the actual mechanisms that blood will damage the brain -- first, if you've got a brain bleed, it'll increase intracranial pressure and make it harder for new oxygenated blood to get in, which will kill your neurons from simply lack of oxygen. Second, even a small bleed will kill neurons, because things like the sodium concentration in your CSF will get messed up, and then when the blood dies in your brain it'll leave behind a bunch of iron from hemoglobin which will also kill your neurons.