Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] OP t1_j8q6wf3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why do some surfactants lather while others don't? by [deleted]
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8q1rz4 wrote
Reply to comment by extrapolatethiscurve in Is the H5N1 bird flu unusually zoonotic compared to other viruses? by PURELY_TO_VOTE
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j8pwxyd wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8pv7kt wrote
[deleted] OP t1_j8pf7t3 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8pcrtc wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8pa7wk wrote
Reply to Is it true the humans could breathe and live in the atmosphere of Venus? by Impossible_Mine_1616
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8p9hgl wrote
[removed]
rootofallworlds t1_j8p7aqi wrote
Reply to Does refracting light impart momentum onto the object that is refracting it, for the duration of the refraction? by TheFeshy
Yes, by conservation of momentum if light is refracted in a way that's not symmetric, momentum must be imparted to the lens. It doesn't even need to be a single pulse - a prism will refract light asymmetrically, and an off-axis section of a spherical-surfaced lens will do it.
itsallrighthere t1_j8ozif0 wrote
Reply to comment by Stephanie87-123 in Recently a gene therapy for a rare inherited neurodegenerative disorder was approved. How come cure is achieved through bone marrow transplantation? by nickoskal024
So if I understand, in the case of genetic metabolic disorders, introducing the missing metabolic function to modified blood cells helps support non modified cells. Do the toxic compounds move from the native cells to the modified cells where they are properly processed?
Do you know where we are in terms of safety for gene therapy?
[deleted] t1_j8oz4ec wrote
[deleted] t1_j8owslc wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Does refracting light impart momentum onto the object that is refracting it, for the duration of the refraction? by TheFeshy
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8ovjg0 wrote
[deleted] OP t1_j8ov6vo wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_j8osv75 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_j8ol6gt wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8ojx4n wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8ojvre wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_j8oju8u wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j8ojsym wrote
[removed]
JonseyCSGO t1_j8ojcm8 wrote
From the equation you've posted you're reacting magnetite with hydrogen gas directly, and generating water vapor and iron as your end products. It's been ages since I calculated enthalpy, but quick searches say you'll need to put in 150kJ of energy per mole reacted.
Said differently, in boring conditions, wet iron rusts, sometimes into magnetite and if it does so, it will evolve off hydrogen gas.
[deleted] OP t1_j8og8rm wrote
[removed]
SvenTropics t1_j8qahsn wrote
Reply to comment by DreamerOfRain in Is it true the humans could breathe and live in the atmosphere of Venus? by Impossible_Mine_1616
I guess the hard part is that you can't use any materials there to construct anything. Nothing in the foreseeable future would be able to survive a trip to the surface and back. So everything would have to be extraterrestrial. With Mars or a moon colony, the thought is that you could mine raw materials from the surface and use them to construct things. Venus doesn't even have a moon you could mine.