Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_j82x7b9 wrote
Reply to comment by evilhamster in Why is electrical flow in appliances 'digital' rather than 'analogue'? by Guilty_Telephone_444
[removed]
gladfelter t1_j82x2uy wrote
Reply to comment by willun in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
The electrical field of an atom is many orders of magnitude larger than the radius of a theoretical WIMP. So interactions and friction would be orders of magnitude less for dark matter.
hatsune_aru t1_j82wvxr wrote
Reply to Is it possible for a photodetector to determine the wavelength of light incident on it without accompanying Optics? by Sin-Silver
the bandgap of a photodiode determines the minimum energy of a photon that can trigger conduction, so you could use that to your advantage, but it won't be band-selective unless you forgo single photon detection.
[deleted] t1_j82wsmi wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82wrdr wrote
Reply to comment by mfb- in Is it possible for a photodetector to determine the wavelength of light incident on it without accompanying Optics? by Sin-Silver
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82wadi wrote
Reply to Why is electrical flow in appliances 'digital' rather than 'analogue'? by Guilty_Telephone_444
[removed]
wonkozsane042 t1_j82vtiy wrote
Reply to comment by Pertho in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
mbf explains everything well. I will only add that I heard this in an online lecture (MIT graduate course on nuclear physics I believe) though the professor said he didn't actually do the calculation to determine how long that would actually take. But I would estimate it between 10000 to 100000 years factoring in all possible background radiation sources which corresponds to mbf's estimate. So maybe it's not as crazy as I was led to believe.
[deleted] t1_j82vs3h wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Do age related diseases like glaucoma progress more quickly in dogs? by WendigoWeiner
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82vlm3 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82ve7x wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_j82v5rv wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What are some of the mechanisms behind why long term physical inactivity and social isolation leads to chronic health diseases? by [deleted]
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82uz6q wrote
[deleted] OP t1_j82uwh4 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What are some of the mechanisms behind why long term physical inactivity and social isolation leads to chronic health diseases? by [deleted]
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_j82uuse wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What are some of the mechanisms behind why long term physical inactivity and social isolation leads to chronic health diseases? by [deleted]
[removed]
EMCemt t1_j82upn1 wrote
Reply to comment by _MagnumDong in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
I bet you had do drink a lot of Wolf Cola preparing for Dr. Mantis Tobaggan's exams.
[deleted] OP t1_j82ua9p wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What are some of the mechanisms behind why long term physical inactivity and social isolation leads to chronic health diseases? by [deleted]
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82u2gr wrote
[deleted] t1_j82tw0b wrote
[deleted] t1_j82tu8g wrote
Reply to what is quantum tunneling out simply? by Piggy468
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82t8av wrote
[deleted] t1_j82szmt wrote
Wild_Sun_1223 t1_j82suhz wrote
Reply to Why is electrical flow in appliances 'digital' rather than 'analogue'? by Guilty_Telephone_444
It's a simpler method than trying to actually move the power up and down directly.
Remember, heating elements work by Joule heating. Thus, they satisfy the law P = V^2/R, meaning that the power is proportional to voltage (V) squared, and inversely to resistance (R) (to rough order because technically R depends on temperature T). To modulate the power high to low in the way you're thinking, you have to decrease the voltage. Now given such things are powered by AC, that's not super hard - just use a transformer - but having a transformer in the appliance (and an adjustable one at that) still adds weight and complexity, and thus cost.
But here's the thing. Thanks to thermal inertia, if you instead subject the heating element to an intermittent/pulsed power input, then so long as the pulsing interval is not too large, it will heat up as though it were being subject to a continuous input of heat at a fraction of the maximum power equal to the duty cycle fraction, i.e. how long each pulse lasts versus the total time between pulses. That is to say, the heat capacity of the heating element causes it to act thermally like a low-pass filter, so the temperature response looks like a greatly smoothed version of the power input waveform. Hence if it stays on 30% of the time and is off 70%, e.g. a 0.3 s pulse followed by 0.7 s of off time, then the heating element will act like it is receiving a steady 30% of the input power (or if you like, sqrt(0.30) ~ 55% of the input voltage), with no transformer required, just a switch (maybe a transistor, but still, it's a switch). And switches (incl. transistors) are cheap and easy to make and use.
[deleted] t1_j82sk4u wrote
Reply to Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82sc45 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_j82x7uz wrote
Reply to What are some of the mechanisms behind why long term physical inactivity and social isolation leads to chronic health diseases? by [deleted]
[removed]