Recent comments in /f/askscience
Accurate_Jaguar_5252 t1_j82jkpv wrote
Don’t know the answer but suspect the word “arranging” in the question incorrectly implies cells moving into position like furniture. Instead, it might be the case that all embryonic neurons are undifferentiated at first then become specialized through chemical interactions with others within distinct areas triggering genetic blueprints to make this cluster a speech center and that one a motor control cluster.
[deleted] t1_j82jh97 wrote
Reply to comment by Melodic-Cake3581 in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82jcal wrote
Reply to comment by thred_pirate_roberts in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
[removed]
mfb- t1_j82iwi8 wrote
Reply to comment by Pertho in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
Iodine only protects the thyroid against radioactive isotopes of iodine. That's interesting after a nuclear explosion or a major power plant accident because Iodine-131 is a significant product of them, but it doesn't do anything otherwise.
> How long would someone need to be cryogenically frozen for cosmic radiation to be a significant threat?
A short-term dose of ~100 mSv is the lowest amount where we are sure it increases the cancer risk. If we assume accumulated dose during freezing acts like a short-term dose then we need ~200-300 years to get there. Damage from the freezing/thawing process is probably still your main concern here. If we look at doses so high that they can kill you short-term then we need over 1 Sv, or thousands of years. This is assuming no special shielding in any way, and it's also ignoring terrestrial radiation sources. Normally most of the radiation dose comes from that part and people get something like 2-3 mSv/year, so we would reach 100 mSv after 30-50 years or so and over 1 Sv after a few centuries.
[deleted] t1_j82iht9 wrote
Reply to comment by DJOMaul in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
[removed]
Natolx OP t1_j82ic7r wrote
Reply to comment by Tiny_Rat in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
>A few cycles of freeze-thaw alone will kill the bacteria fairly effectively, the problem is that it may break your glass vial and damage the protein inside.
The protein will be fine. It's already been freeze thawed a bunch of times in a plastic tube. But yes, the glass breaking is a problem.
[deleted] t1_j82gywk wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82glk8 wrote
iimplodethings t1_j82gk6t wrote
Reply to comment by RebelWithoutAClue in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
Exactly. I had a cosmology professor who rounded pi to 1 in estimating the average density of the universe or something
[deleted] t1_j82g7c9 wrote
[removed]
Tiny_Rat t1_j82ey1r wrote
Reply to comment by PoorSketchArtist in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
Yes, but that again requires a fairly high dose, since bacteria do have ways of dealing with ROS that can be stepped up in times of oxidative stress.
bloodmonarch t1_j82ef43 wrote
Reply to comment by Pandagineer in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
All the objects are orbiting the system at their own path. If we sum all the rotational momentum they probably are rotating a little
Tiny_Rat t1_j82eevt wrote
Reply to comment by Natolx in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
A few cycles of freeze-thaw alone will kill the bacteria fairly effectively, the problem is that it may break your glass vial and damage the protein inside.
frogjg2003 t1_j82edvu wrote
From your picture, it looks like the glass should be enough to block almost all of the radiation anyway.
[deleted] t1_j82e2ob wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82dwcs wrote
Reply to comment by RebelWithoutAClue in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
[removed]
Natolx OP t1_j82dcj0 wrote
Reply to comment by Pedroarak in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
>The gm500 has two tubes right? I don't know how it chooses which one to use (probably changes after it gets saturated), but if the standart tube is something like a sbm-20 or j305 it probably picks up quite a bit of beta that goes through the ampoule, and the cpm to usv is most likely calibrated with the energy of cesium, so i think the actual doserate is lower that what it shows
I placed whichever tube was more sensitive over the sample (one of them barely detected anything). Good call on the calibration.
[deleted] t1_j82caom wrote
[removed]
Pedroarak t1_j82c6o1 wrote
Reply to comment by Natolx in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
The gm500 has two tubes right? I don't know how it chooses which one to use (probably changes after it gets saturated), but if the standart tube is something like a sbm-20 or j305 it probably picks up quite a bit of beta that goes through the ampoule, and the cpm to usv is most likely calibrated with the energy of cesium, so i think the actual doserate is lower that what it shows
[deleted] t1_j82c4nw wrote
Reply to Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
[removed]
boomchacle t1_j82bs7p wrote
Reply to comment by iimplodethings in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
At that point, the sample might be outputting enough energy to actually sustain life instead of killing it off lol
[deleted] t1_j82bh7g wrote
Reply to Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j82bgtu wrote
[removed]
thred_pirate_roberts t1_j82b7qw wrote
Reply to comment by _MagnumDong in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
Thanks, u/_MagnumDong
[deleted] t1_j82jp4q wrote
Reply to comment by Natolx in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
[deleted]