Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_j81z446 wrote
[removed]
Camilo543 t1_j81z2fz wrote
Reply to comment by Natolx in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
Would this make UV sterilization impossible?
[deleted] t1_j81z10k wrote
Reply to Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81yjfk wrote
[deleted] t1_j81yj2r wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81y4u0 wrote
Savonlinna t1_j81wh2y wrote
Reply to comment by _MagnumDong in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
The explanation is bested only by your /u/.
Excellent work, neighbour.
Natolx OP t1_j81wfiq wrote
Reply to comment by Redwoo in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
>The dose rate seems to be very high for DU gamma radiation. I calculated 400nSv/h using 0.7 Sv/Gy on contact for 0.2 w/o U235 for newly depleted material. The dose rate will increase a bit as daughter products accumulate over thousands of years, but that isn’t particularly relevant.
This is just the default calculation of cpm to microsieverts by my radiation counter (GM500) so I suppose it could be that the calculation is wrong.
Natolx OP t1_j81w5ly wrote
Reply to comment by EmilyU1F984 in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
Nothing but protein, but there is phosphate from the buffer as well.
Edit: An autoclave would almost certainly denature it. There is resistant to denaturating and then there is resistant to autoclave lol. Prions are one of the few proteins that are resistant to autoclaving and they are considered exceptions.
[deleted] t1_j81w4dr wrote
[removed]
Natolx OP t1_j81vyay wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
>Without being replenished by new protein, the GFP would photobleach pretty quickly anyways, so I don't think the necklace is worth trying to sterilize. While GFP is stable to protease digestion, it doesn't really remain fluorescent in a purified solution for more than a few days if you just leave it our like you would with normal jewelry. Plus, killing the bacteria probably won't improve the appearance, as they likely broke down a lot of your GFP for food and their corpses will keep making the solution cloudy even if they're no longer alive. Honestly, it's probably easier to write this one off and make a new one.
I think you underestimate how much fluorescent protein we are talking about... This is milligrams. This is many orders of magnitude more protein than you are seeing photobleached in an immunofluorescence assay.
To put this in perspective, this liquid containing fluorescent protein entirely absorbs a 473nm laser I have. None of it makes it out the other side.
willun t1_j81up2b wrote
Reply to comment by Cheshire-Kate in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
Would the dark matter provide drag? I wonder what the movements of dark matter would be in galaxies like that. I assume for the Milky Way it just rotates in line with the movement of stars (or more accurately, the stars move in line with the dark matter)
Redwoo t1_j81up1z wrote
The dose rate seems to be very high for DU gamma radiation. I calculated 400nSv/h using 0.7 Sv/Gy on contact for 0.2 w/o U235 for newly depleted material. The dose rate will increase a bit as daughter products accumulate over thousands of years, but that isn’t particularly relevant.
[deleted] t1_j81ujfv wrote
[removed]
Pandagineer t1_j81twjr wrote
Reply to comment by _MagnumDong in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
So is the Hill Cloud rotating, whereas the Oort Cloud is not rotating?
[deleted] t1_j81tq2k wrote
Reply to What would happen to a person standing on the edge of a faultline when it moves? by Endorkend
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81swxw wrote
[removed]
beef-o-lipso t1_j81s5gl wrote
Comets are rather common. They can have very different periods some very long, others shorter.
What is rare are comets that are visible to the naked eye. Been over 20 years, I think, since the last one.
What you are observing is an uptick in interest from MSM in all things space due to the JWST, Space X, happenings on the ISS and other interesting things. That means more stories and more awareness. It just seems like an uptick.
[deleted] t1_j81s2zd wrote
[deleted] t1_j81rrzm wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81r11g wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81q9s8 wrote
Reply to comment by Cheshire-Kate in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j81q5yd wrote
Reply to How does light stimulate the eye ? by agent007653
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81q48n wrote
Reply to comment by Natolx in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j820h79 wrote
Reply to How many years did it take ecosystems to recover from K-Pg Extinction event (Chicxulub asteroid)? by virgoing
[removed]