Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_j81gx7z wrote
Reply to Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81gqxn wrote
Reply to comment by DJOMaul in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
[removed]
thomasxin t1_j81gnu6 wrote
Reply to comment by Player_KK in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
Gravity does interact over long distances over long periods of time though, is there a mechanism that acts against that compared to smaller accretion disks? What prevents an elliptical galaxy collapsing into a spiral, and how do we know that won't happen even if given a trillion years?
[deleted] t1_j81gnt5 wrote
Reply to comment by DJOMaul in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81gha8 wrote
Reply to Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
[removed]
omgu8mynewt t1_j81g4bj wrote
Reply to Estimating roughly, how much of a bacterial genome is thought to be of viral origin? by josephrainer
In bacteria, dormant viruses in the genome are called prophages. I found one paper, in eight E. coli strains, between 8-22 prophages were predicted to be found in each strain's genome. E coli genome is approximately 5.6 Mb. Prophage genomes were from 5.6 to 131.9 kb, say on average 70 Kb. So on average, (14 prophages x 70,000) / 5,600,00 * 100 = 17.5%. Very back of the envolope maths, and only for E coli, results will vary wildly. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03093/full
mschweini t1_j81g23l wrote
Reply to comment by wonkozsane042 in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
> but most will survive and produces a new generation
Might be fun to feed those bacteria on purpose, and see how well they mutate and evolute towards radiation-hardiness!
PoorSketchArtist t1_j81fssk wrote
Reply to comment by wonkozsane042 in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
With enough radiation though you would create a large number of ROS which can chemically stress the cells and kill them in all sorts of ways.
[deleted] t1_j81fn8j wrote
Reply to Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81fdf2 wrote
Reply to what is quantum tunneling out simply? by Piggy468
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81egvx wrote
Reply to comment by iimplodethings in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81ef6n wrote
[removed]
Player_KK t1_j81edoc wrote
Reply to comment by thomasxin in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
Originally, it was believed that elliptical galaxies would turn into spiral galaxies, but we have since found this to not be true. Elliptical galaxies..... in short, are not active. They are characterized by a distinct lack of star forming gases, and little to no new star formation. Existing stars seldom interact with one another, so much of the shape comes from those star forming gases, via angular momentum.
​
At least this is how I understand it.
[deleted] t1_j81e0ql wrote
Reply to comment by DisgruntledBrDev in What did Darwin mean by "genetic connection"? by DisgruntledBrDev
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81dtmg wrote
DJOMaul t1_j81diqd wrote
Reply to comment by Pedroarak in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
>The radioactivity is due to the local geology. Underground water dissolves radium in uraniferous igneous rock and carries it to the surface through at least nine known hot springs.[15] These are used as spas by locals and tourists.
Uh. That feels... unsafe.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsar,_Iran] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsar,_Iran)
[deleted] t1_j81cvl1 wrote
Reply to comment by Natolx in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
[removed]
Natolx OP t1_j81cnjx wrote
Reply to comment by RebelWithoutAClue in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
No worries about the denaturing, fluorescent proteins are notoriously stable structures. They are even resistant to Proteinase K... which is ridiculous.
[deleted] t1_j81cfxc wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81bfoq wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j81bdet wrote
[deleted] t1_j81b8ow wrote
[deleted] t1_j81azrr wrote
[removed]
RebelWithoutAClue t1_j81awnc wrote
Reply to comment by Natolx in Can the Radiation from a Sample of Depleted Uranium Sterilize? by Natolx
It may be that a thorough irradiation sterilization will end up denaturing your protein anyways.
Maybe one could accept that a beautiful thing could be beautiful also because it is temporary.
At what temp will your protein denature? If the protein denatures at a high enough temp, you could hold it at a lower temp to make life really hard for bacteria and wait it out for a few days to kill it down while not denaturing your protein.
Basically pasteurize the thing at a temp that is below the temp that will damage the protein you care about.
[deleted] t1_j81h5jy wrote
Reply to comment by thomasxin in Why is the Oort cloud spherical? by Outliver
[deleted]