Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_j76hvih wrote
Reply to What causes the onset of puberty specifically? by Voomit
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j76gsgo wrote
Reply to What causes the onset of puberty specifically? by Voomit
[removed]
Pharisaeus t1_j76dlcb wrote
> If we push the stick 10 cm, does it mean the stick is 10 cm shorter before the push reaches the other end?
Consider that this "stick" is not really a rigid body, but rather a large "spring", and it can compress (at atomic scale). So yes, the stick would be, from certain point of view, shorter while the push is being propagated.
> additional force to transiently deform it
Again, since it's a spring, there is no additional force needed, because the energy is conserved (aka: the spring will uncompress, releasing this "deform" energy) back.
daaabss t1_j76cew7 wrote
Reply to comment by happyhourscience in Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
Okay. Is that the simpliest explanation? Still have no clue
Jarlentium t1_j769f2w wrote
Reply to comment by speculatrix in Does the central part of my vision see in a different frame rate than the outer part? by Calvinkelly
I would bet that this effect is less from the eyes themselves and more from the brain focusing on your center of view and only really watching for movement/changes in your peripheral vision
[deleted] t1_j767qsw wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j765oki wrote
[deleted] t1_j76458g wrote
sunlitupland5 t1_j761skf wrote
Reply to Why do some allergies get worse over time and some better? And how does allergen desensitivity work without making the reaction worse? by DontDoDrugs316
Need also to consider gut microbiome diversity when looking at immune reaction. Research is still in early stage but theoretically the greater the diversity the less likely immune system is to over react to a perceived threat
gilgwath t1_j760ttt wrote
Reply to Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
TL;DR: I think cloning will never be a really viable technology for industrial use. At least not on its own. Not because it's hard problem to solve, but it doesn't scale well. That's why there is little investment and slow development.
Let's assume you cloned a sheep. Congratulations, you now get to care for a baby sheep. You need sheep milk to feed it, you need to provide it with shelter, warmth etc.
That's cool if you cloned one sheep for the lulz. But we want to make some money here. So we clone 1000 sheep. Now where do you get the milk from? From a 1000 other mother sheep who also had at least 1000 baby sheep. You also need a massive lab AND a massive pen to keep your sheep. Workers to do the cloning AND workers to take care of the baby sheep.
If you just want to double your sheep output, it's much easier to just have double the amount of sheep and have them reproduce naturally. No lab required, the herd mostly takes care of their needs.
You've also sloved none of the other problems big scale animal farms come with: methan emissions, land and water usage, animal cruelty etc. You also opend the pandoras box of ethical questions around cloning.
Next question is, will you be able to sell you produce at a competive price ahd enough customers?
Assuming you somehow manage to make it profitable, all of this only works until someone really figures out how to grow meat in a lab at a large scale.
There's no really goo business case for it, so there's no one who's really keen on spending millions to perfect the technology, industrialise it and then build a business on it.
aotus_trivirgatus t1_j75ysk0 wrote
Reply to comment by FirstSynapse in Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
When iPSCs first appeared, many people doubted that they would truly be functionally identical to ESCs. After a few years, I stopped following the field. Is the verdict in?
[deleted] t1_j75yqry wrote
[deleted] t1_j75x6fd wrote
[deleted] t1_j75vu38 wrote
Reply to comment by TeamMemberDZ-015 in How did the Achilles tendon become known as such and what was it called before? by MarqoTheDragon
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j75ukp2 wrote
[removed]
WealthyMarmot t1_j75ti4z wrote
Reply to comment by qwertyshark in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
Not sure what you're seeing, but 65,000 can be found on the USAF page for the F-15, which also matches up with what I've seen elsewhere. Most modern twin-engine fighters are in the same ballpark, including the F-22, Eurofighter Typhoon, China's J-15 and Russia's SU-35.
heteromer t1_j75t3e2 wrote
Reply to comment by CrazyisNSFW in Why do some allergies get worse over time and some better? And how does allergen desensitivity work without making the reaction worse? by DontDoDrugs316
I read a book on molecular and cellular immunology one holiday and it was such a fantastic read. I definitely developed an interest in it.
[deleted] t1_j75sgr9 wrote
Reply to comment by speculatrix in Does the central part of my vision see in a different frame rate than the outer part? by Calvinkelly
[removed]
CrazyisNSFW t1_j75sd1q wrote
Reply to Why do some allergies get worse over time and some better? And how does allergen desensitivity work without making the reaction worse? by DontDoDrugs316
Gross oversimplification: After being exposed to allergen, your body creates memory of it. First exposure is usually mild, you may not even notice it. But your body creates memory as a defense mechanism. Next time you're exposed to allergens, your body gives stronger and quicker response. That's why your allergy reaction can be worse with time.
With desensitization, you're exposed to allergens in such a small dose that you're not reacting to it. Desensitization tricks your body into thinking that the allergen is just a normal thing in environment and you tolerate (desensitized?) the allergens better with time. Of course this is not possible (yet) for every allergens and you should be under close supervision in case something goes wrong and you have severe reaction.
Immunology is really complex but amazing science field.
PS: if you're interested, probably you should search for "Type I (IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity".
OskaMeijer t1_j75pb11 wrote
Reply to comment by EndlessEmergency in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
I mean, it is good that it wouldn't fall at terminal velocity but I feel like something the size of a bus falling at even 1/4 of that speed could be pretty devastating to whatever it hits.
[deleted] t1_j75oo0j wrote
[removed]
qwertyshark t1_j75ofu0 wrote
Reply to comment by WealthyMarmot in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
Just checked google and F15 ceiling limit shows as 50.000ft is there something I’m missing?
speculatrix t1_j75ni1f wrote
Reply to Does the central part of my vision see in a different frame rate than the outer part? by Calvinkelly
Yes, only the central part of your retina, called the fovea, has the best high quality vision for colour and resolution, that's part of the macula. This relies on light sensitive cells called cones.
The outer retina uses cells called rods which are more sensitive to light with a faster response time, and are better for night, but only offer monochrome vision. This is thought to be a survival trait, to see the movement of predators at night in your peripheral vision.
So, that full colour vision you have? Your brain is faking it.
nasalemons t1_j75ljw6 wrote
Reply to Why do some allergies get worse over time and some better? And how does allergen desensitivity work without making the reaction worse? by DontDoDrugs316
So this is a gross simplification but some allergens get worse over time because the more you are episodes to it the higher chance your body can create a reaction to it. And with desensitization basically you start with a teeny tiny dose we hope that you don’t react to and very slowly increase it to a point where you may have a mild rash or very mild itchy throat but it’s ok overall
[deleted] t1_j76i9pg wrote
Reply to How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
[removed]