Recent comments in /f/askscience
efh1 t1_j73kh7l wrote
Reply to comment by Corrupted_G_nome in Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
That’s the thing about cults. They have different moral and ethic codes.
Corrupted_G_nome t1_j73kbme wrote
Reply to comment by efh1 in Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
Now that you mention it I linda remember the headline on this case. Super weird imo but the tech is very existing and very possible. Morally and ethically its super questionable tho.
efh1 t1_j73jxr5 wrote
Reply to comment by Corrupted_G_nome in Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
I know this is going to sound crazy and people get weird about ufo stuff and cults but there is literally a ufo cult that claimed they cloned a human awhile ago and they still offer cloning services on their website. I wish I was making this up and at the time it was regarded as a hoax and it may have been but if you research the cult they have a PHD in charge and are pretty serious about wanting to clone people. I cover it all in the article below.
https://medium.com/predict/a-ufo-cult-that-offers-alleged-human-cloning-services-b1a95874f83b
[deleted] OP t1_j73j5qk wrote
Reply to comment by za419 in Are plants growing from cuttings as healthy as those grown from seed? by [deleted]
[removed]
Corrupted_G_nome t1_j73ivzg wrote
Reply to comment by efh1 in Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
There was a case of human cloning in China and the government jailed that doctor and their staff. It was illegal and lacked permits officially and the results came out after the child was born via surrogate. I never did hear much follow up so I don't know if that was a hoax or fake news story.
I heard another of a family cloning a young child who was hit by a car and died. Again I did not confirm that story. It does bring up some weird ethical questions tho about potential uses of this technology.
Twisted9Demented t1_j73iv2m wrote
Reply to comment by radioactive_dude in A medical isotope made from nuclear weapons waste (Tc-99m) has a six-hour half-life. How do hospitals keep it in stock? by Gwaiian
I don't know how you are , but Thank you ☺
[deleted] t1_j73idqn wrote
[deleted] t1_j73hv2g wrote
[removed]
EducationalCan3358 t1_j73eydo wrote
Reply to comment by CrateDane in Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
Good to know, thank you for the response!
[deleted] t1_j73d3s0 wrote
[deleted] t1_j73cuiu wrote
Longshot_45 t1_j73copi wrote
Reply to comment by floralnightmare22 in Are plants growing from cuttings as healthy as those grown from seed? by [deleted]
Here's one article on trees, that suffer from deficits after cloning.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-11003684
And here's an article about sea grass that's been doing it for 4,500 years.
Polyploidy seems to be the mechanism in the genetics of plants such as the seaweed that allows this behavior.
efh1 t1_j73bv0e wrote
Reply to comment by atomfullerene in Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
The next question is addressing the fact that we could do this to humans if we wanted and whether or not that could be happening. There have been claims by groups with clear intentions to clone humans despite the obvious legal and ethical issues. Is it absurd that such interested parties would proceed covertly?
[deleted] t1_j739qgf wrote
Reply to comment by SuperSyrias in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
[removed]
eglue t1_j739ije wrote
Reply to comment by Naive_Age_566 in extremely long stick additional questions? by Unnombrepls
What if the material is a super conductor?
Could be a situation where the amount of force to move it 10 cm would shatter it before it fully transmitted the pressure?
ShrimpFriedMyRice t1_j738sen wrote
Reply to comment by aggasalk in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
Helicopters, drones, and bullets cannot reach the balloon. A fighter jet might be able to if it's a specialized one with tech we don't know about. For reference, the F16 can only hit 50k feet and the SR71 can hit 85k feet. Weather balloons can be as high as 120k feet.
The reason the US hasn't done anything is probably a combination of damage on the ground, the fact that satellites exist and could probably do way more Intel gathering than a balloon drifting in the wind, and that by destroying the balloon we've shown the world how we deal with that situation.
The element of surprise is huge and if your enemy doesn't know how you'll answer and react to certain situations, it makes them nervous. By destroying the balloon, we show China and the world our capabilities and response. It's better to keep them guessing and ignore it.
EndlessEmergency t1_j738ot4 wrote
It's reportedly at around 66,000 feet, which is only 1,000 feet above the declared maximum altitude of an F-15. Using the F-15s cannon on it, one could perforate the balloon and cause it to lose lift gas, which would end in a gradual descent. Even if the balloon were to fully deflate, it would act as a huge source of drag (much like a parachute) and prevent the payload from free falling.
Frangiblepani t1_j738c3k wrote
Reply to comment by aggasalk in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
How about sending up a balloon?
[deleted] t1_j7383ly wrote
Reply to comment by paranoiamachine in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j737oan wrote
[removed]
floralnightmare22 t1_j736kte wrote
Reply to comment by Longshot_45 in Are plants growing from cuttings as healthy as those grown from seed? by [deleted]
Do you know what differentiates the clones that can keep cloning indefinitely from ones with limited cycles ?
[deleted] t1_j736a0i wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j7365ty wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How could a high-altitude surveillance balloon be captured? by aggasalk
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j7356hg wrote
[removed]
Corrupted_G_nome t1_j73kv3w wrote
Reply to comment by efh1 in Back in the late 90s, I remember hearing that scientists “cloned a sheep”. What actually happened with the cloning, and what advancements have been made as a result of that? by foxmag86
To be fair the article shared also included embryonic stem cell research which is banned in some US states but was a critical point of research of all kinds for some time (maybe still is) so I can see how that would go underground.
Designer babies should be a forbidden technology. Cure illnesses ore birth and remove genetic defects, fine. Choosing phenotype traits is creepy af imom