Recent comments in /f/WorcesterMA

getgoing65 t1_itpqn7p wrote

Reply to comment by bartnd in Where to buy a shed by erwin_s

I built my first shed myself. (Used as a pool house) it was a lot of work. Off and on work on weekends took most of the summer. I bought a reeds ferry last year (10x20) Good quality. I build the base myself , to save money, using their specifications. 4x4 pressure treat with gravel for drainage. I’m happy with the shed . Went up in a day. They pre-build most of it and assemble on site. I think 7k for the shed and another 300 for the base

0

beanpole99 t1_itpprh7 wrote

Worcester has a cat iii ILS landing system on runway 11 which allows planes to land in very low visibility but only if the wind is from the east. Most of the time, the wind in this area is from the west and that runway (29) does not have the same landing system so planes can't land in extremely low visibility. Unfortunately, due to the geography of the hill it Is built on it is difficult or impossible to make runway 29 cat iii.

61

Centrist_gun_nut t1_itpoua9 wrote

I'm not this kind of pilot, but I'm pretty sure the issue is that ILS landing equipment in Worcester has been broken for months, so the plane OP needs is still in New York.

Here's the plane I think they intended to use: on Flightaware .

I have no idea how to link NOTAMs but they were issued on 8/10 and appear active...

​

>!ORH 08/011 ORH NAV ILS RWY 29 DME u/S 2208101301-2304192000EST

​

I have no idea why they're not fixing it or if this is a typical turn around time for this sort of repair.

EDIT: Oh man, it's literally the same flight as when this last came up.

15

potus1001 t1_itpd775 wrote

Minado is good simply for the all you can eat sushi. There used to (like 20 years ago) be a place in Natick, further up Route 9 towards Framingham, called Pacific Buffet, that was amazing. But then they ended up closing and now it’s a furniture store.

Really disappointing.

1

inthe80s t1_itpd6ed wrote

Boston and Worcester are both showing a visibility of 0.00 miles right now, I'm guessing Logan has more expensive equipment allowing take offs in this pea soup.

With a direct bus trip to Logan it would add another 60-90 minutes from ORH. At that point you're missing your early meeting anyways.

49

motherof16paws t1_itok7xe wrote

Fellow chair user here. As you know, having a ramp and having a ramp that works and a driver who knows how to tie down a chair are two very different things. This is very true for the WRTA, who has yet to be sued within an inch of its life for ADA violations unlike the MBTA.

Para transit is for residents only with paperwork on file signed by a doc. So if you are visiting, it'll be a no-go for you. Like most paratransits, it is also trash.

2

barry_abides t1_itohrvr wrote

Fair enough, I would say that qualitatively one would expect higher crime rates in larger cities, just by virtue of their density (and the somewhat greater concentration of poverty, drug dealing, etc.). Relative to crime rates in other major cities in MA, we aren't really an outlier. If you just want to look at how often we hear about crimes, then yes the absolute number comes into play, and we are on the high end because of population (still better than Springfield which has fewer people).

1

thedecentshepherd t1_itodktk wrote

Here's information from the WRTA's website regarding the bus accessibility. https://www.therta.com/elderly-and-disabled/accessibility-at-the-wrta/

And they also offer complimentary paratransit service that allows for more direct service (these do have to be reserved ahead of time though) https://www.wrtaparatransit.com/access-ada-complementary-paratransit-service.htm

3