Recent comments in /f/Washington

lurkerfromstoneage t1_j400siz wrote

I would only vote support for this IF: it was in-office use only, not for external pharmacy fill or use at home. Doors security present. Taxpayer money did not fund it. Administering in a session was done with and monitored by a licensed therapist or professional, not a tech or self proclaimed expert. There were medical physicians to take vitals and respond to any situations. No walk ins or self referrals, or self diagnoses- must be referred by a licensed psychologist/psychiatrist. Patients were expected to handle themselves maturely on social media etc. Taking psych meds isn’t something a lot of people are open/bragging about. But I feel like people would just brag about this. “Yoooo bruuuhhhh no CAP my shroom sesh was straight BUSSIN” 🙄

−4

RevengeOfTheDong t1_j3zxffv wrote

Imagine saying that with weed, it’s a fucking joke to do this special-interests-only version of legalization. We don’t need daddy government looking over our shoulders like we’re misbehaving children.

I’ll take the black market 10/10 over this bill and hope it doesn’t pass. It’s just like the Ohio weed bill.

−2

ThanksForTheRain t1_j3zw1o0 wrote

Yes, we stayed clear of them, only close enough to get a peek. I believe there was a sign nearby stating keep 100 yards distance. Circled back shortly ahead, and when we passed by a handful started coming after us. They didn't seem particularly aggressive, but it was unnerving to see the heads pop out closer and closer

1

PreviousRepeat0 OP t1_j3zvpgk wrote

The seals aren’t an issue in my experience. They like watching and usually will be the first to get out of the way. When pups are concerned it’s a bit different. I think the rules are to stay at least 100 yards from pups…might have been a few nearby when you came upon them? I hope you do get out soon, it’s so rewarding when the good days strike

1