Recent comments in /f/UpliftingNews
Projectrage t1_j8igq7c wrote
Reply to comment by Jaker788 in Economist: War and subsidies may have knocked as much as ten years off green transition by 10drinkminimum
Doing the same. I’m using it as an excuse to be more efficient.
GenericFatGuy t1_j8if12x wrote
Reply to comment by Extension-Ad-2760 in Fighting Climate Change Was Costly. Now It’s Profitable. by dolphins3
Sure it does. It's called even more catastrophic. Calling the displacement of tens of millions of people as "seriously impacting" just gives people wiggle room to downplay the crisis as not as bad as it's being made to seem.
jsmith_92 t1_j8ieq3l wrote
Reply to comment by ComradeH_VIE in India finds Lithium deposits for first time in country by magical_healing
Sounds like quantum of solace
frog_jesus_ t1_j8ieosy wrote
Reply to comment by Angelusz in Newborn saved from rubble in quake-hit Syria in good health by Nah_Fam_Oh_Dam
No. Trying to excuse kidnapping a baby is really too much. There's nothing about such a crisis that justifies that in any way. All it is is parasites taking advantage of a horrible situation.
Extension-Ad-2760 t1_j8idm5k wrote
Reply to comment by GenericFatGuy in Fighting Climate Change Was Costly. Now It’s Profitable. by dolphins3
It is catastrophic. But that leaves no room for the description of worse outcomes.
BuddyJim30 t1_j8idfgd wrote
Apparently corporations and governments will "embrace green" if they can "make green" from it.
MadCat221 t1_j8idbeh wrote
The problem still remains with Capitalism only understanding things in monetary terms.
GenericFatGuy t1_j8icvml wrote
Reply to comment by Extension-Ad-2760 in Fighting Climate Change Was Costly. Now It’s Profitable. by dolphins3
How the fuck does displacing tens of millions of people not sound catastrophic to you?
[deleted] t1_j8ic75n wrote
[removed]
birberbarborbur t1_j8iafgk wrote
Reply to comment by Vigitiser in Fighting Climate Change Was Costly. Now It’s Profitable. by dolphins3
True but bp had the biggest and most dangerous
Jaker788 t1_j8i8p85 wrote
Reply to comment by krichuvisz in Economist: War and subsidies may have knocked as much as ten years off green transition by 10drinkminimum
Amazingly it's more efficient to generate electricity with a gas turbine and use an electric heat pump than to use it directly at 95% efficiency. Gas turbines are usually 60% efficient since they don't use steam turbines, they use essentially a turbojet.
But with the new generation capacity being a large portion of renewables and grid scale energy storage projects such as moss landing and others will help stabilize the capacity, it's really a short term problem. Meanwhile the electric based appliances you have will only get more efficient as the grid gets more efficient and the gas ones will stay the same.
that_one_bunny t1_j8i8p2m wrote
Reply to comment by takatori in Lizzo reacts to snowplow naming contest win, shouts out Osseo Middle School by citytiger
dolerbom t1_j8i874a wrote
The economy is a function of the government. Specifically, it is a function of the United States government. Building renewables could have always been profitable because we could have shaped regulations to where that was the only option. Jobs would have still been created, value would have still been created, and the economy would have moved just as efficiently.
The only difference is there would be different winners and losers. Our government has always picked the same people who put us into this mess to be the winners.
Fanace5 t1_j8i7mln wrote
Reply to comment by Vigitiser in Fighting Climate Change Was Costly. Now It’s Profitable. by dolphins3
True, everyone remembers the AT&T Brazilian Oil Spill of '93
dolerbom t1_j8i7dy5 wrote
Reply to comment by Nobody4831 in Fighting Climate Change Was Costly. Now It’s Profitable. by dolphins3
They can have a lot of profits when they get nationalized and tried at the Hague.
So tired of politicians pretending that we can rely on the same people that put us in this mess to get us out of it.
Psychomadeye t1_j8i71bm wrote
Reply to comment by krichuvisz in Economist: War and subsidies may have knocked as much as ten years off green transition by 10drinkminimum
Oh no, using only 20% of the gas you'd use otherwise! Literally the worst!
baj8881 t1_j8i4exq wrote
Reply to comment by Reggie5633 in Lizzo reacts to snowplow naming contest win, shouts out Osseo Middle School by citytiger
Here's another one that made me laugh...
Oh Snow You Didn't
😂
ProleAcademy t1_j8i289k wrote
Reply to comment by Gemmabeta in Fighting Climate Change Was Costly. Now It’s Profitable. by dolphins3
That's the sound of a company that definitely shouldn't have its assets seized and its executives tried and executed wink wink
Jonano1365 t1_j8i1qvw wrote
Reply to comment by Extension-Ad-2760 in Fighting Climate Change Was Costly. Now It’s Profitable. by dolphins3
What're you talking about? The current trajectory isn't acceptable, we failed to tackle climate change, and the outcomes *will* be catastrophic. Displacement (and inevitably, death) of tens of millions *is* catastrophic.
The fact that the situation feasibly could be worse doesn't make the situation better.
You wanna be clear in your communication? How about this ranking:
- Catastrophic climate change.
- Societal collapse.
- Threat of extinction.
We're at 1 at the moment. Downplaying the threat of climate change (which, in my opinion, you are doing right now) is incredibly dangerous. In a lot of peoples mind if it's not catastrophic then there's no rush (look at any climate conference). Not pressing the grave importance of immediate climate action is how we end up with even worse outcomes.
nordhand t1_j8i0zyq wrote
Reply to comment by Gemmabeta in Fighting Climate Change Was Costly. Now It’s Profitable. by dolphins3
BP the guys that invented the carbon footprint to defect away from them just having the wost oil spill in history and ruined most of the coastline in the gulf of Mexico. They have never carried about the environment only thier bottom line
krichuvisz t1_j8i0m5a wrote
Reply to comment by Jaker788 in Economist: War and subsidies may have knocked as much as ten years off green transition by 10drinkminimum
Unlucky if your electric power is produced with gas.
Jaker788 t1_j8i084h wrote
Reply to Economist: War and subsidies may have knocked as much as ten years off green transition by 10drinkminimum
The natural gas shortage in Europe kinda got me on a motivated fast path to delete my gas service in the PNW. First step was a hybrid electric water heater replacing my gas one, utility offered a $500 rebate on that. Next step is induction electric range. Third step is heat pump HVAC.
As much as natural gas is the new hot thing for energy and transportation, I figure with the war it may be shorter lived or stalled a bit for something better due to prices. Hopefully we can regulate production in the US as well and stop fracking so much.
JacquesPanther t1_j8i02ut wrote
Reply to comment by OverMedicatedTexan in Lizzo reacts to snowplow naming contest win, shouts out Osseo Middle School by citytiger
Thank you!
ZeStupidPotato t1_j8hzdhi wrote
Reply to comment by makelo06 in India finds Lithium deposits for first time in country by magical_healing
Yo sit the fuck down Steiner
You are 80 years too late
Daddy_Macron t1_j8ij4u4 wrote
Reply to comment by chimpaflimp in Economist: War and subsidies may have knocked as much as ten years off green transition by 10drinkminimum
Good journalism isn't free and free journalism tends to be trash.