Recent comments in /f/Pennsylvania

DelianSK13 OP t1_jahiagp wrote

>It turns out that the investigators who performed the original tests used some ridiculously sensitive portable equipment whose threshold for detection is .01 nanogram. One nanogram is equivalent to 0.000000001 grams, which, if my decimal-place counting is correct, is the same as one billionth of a gram. And that’s for one nanogram. In this case, we’re talking about a threshold that is one one-hundredth of said nanogram.
>
>
>
>Over the weekend, investigators sent the supposedly fentanyl-positive products off to a lab for further testing. And the lab found absolutely zero illegal drugs in any of those products. It’s unclear what the lab’s detection threshold is, but it’s clearly more than .01 nanogram, an amount that wouldn’t even begin to get a person high.

218

choppinbrocholi t1_jahgmla wrote

This proposed group did not come from students but an outside group pushing their group in. They’ve been trying this in multiple schools in eastern PA.
I would be all for it had it been organically organized by students. Schools do allow most groups organized by students especially if they self fund.
Very little of the origins of this have been put forward.
If gardeners of America want to start a group in this school they should not be allowed either without a student/s proposal.

−14

bdschuler t1_jahcuje wrote

Clearly the mistake was made at the start. The idiot Superintendent should have just cancelled all the religious clubs. But by being an idiot and not, she will cost the taxpayers in this district millions now in lawsuits, will most likely lose her job, and will have trouble finding a new one. Make no mistake, they will lose in court and it will be very costly and this will be a black mark on her record.

How she made this mistake is beyond me. Any simple Google search would have told her the correct answer and why NOT to go the route she did. But she took a stance and that stance is going to cost her dearly I am afraid.

All that is left now is to watch it play out in court and see how much taxpayers are going to be on the hook for and how long she lasts before she is let go.

15

HeyZuesHChrist t1_jahbweq wrote

Do you know who would murder a bunch of kids?

Satan would.

EDIT: I was pointing out the irony here of someone complaining about a Satan club by threatening to kill a bunch of kids. If I had to choose between members of a Satan club minding their own business or a Christian threatening to murder kids I’m picking the Satan club every time.

Edit 2: Allow me to explain the Christian hypocrisy further as there seems to be some confusion. The person who called in this threat is acting more like the Satan they believe exists than their savior.

These Christians act more like their version of Satan than anything the Satan Club is doing, which is absolutely nothing but minding their own business.

−4

Jeffd187 t1_jah9bop wrote

The district was damned if they did, damned if they didn’t.

If they denied the club, they would have had so much pressure raining down on them from all around the country and sued by different organizations.

They let it happened, and suffered the consequences.

In the end, both sides got a “win.” The club made its point and the district could say, “Look at the threats….”

In the end…it was a hot news story that just brings to light the differences we have here in the country of the USA.

−14