Recent comments in /f/MachineLearning
oneandonly13579 t1_jasn3ro wrote
Reply to [R] High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity by SleekEagle
brain2img 2023, cool
mrtransisteur t1_jasibpc wrote
Reply to [D] Is there an ML project out there that recommends movies based on more than the usual features? by of_a_varsity_athlete
I’ve been using ChatGPT for exactly this, vibe based movie recs. One trick is to encourage it to suggest older classics, lesser-known films, lower budget films, or foreign films. Just tell it when you’ve already seen the movie or if there’s some other misalignment between the suggestions and what you want to see
---AI--- t1_jasgezh wrote
Reply to comment by ShowerVagina in [D] OpenAI introduces ChatGPT and Whisper APIs (ChatGPT API is 1/10th the cost of GPT-3 API) by minimaxir
I only saw it mentioned in the context of API/Enterprise users.
of_a_varsity_athlete OP t1_jascgmq wrote
Reply to comment by radarsat1 in [D] Is there an ML project out there that recommends movies based on more than the usual features? by of_a_varsity_athlete
I tried ChatGPT. It's obviously trained on info that thinks "Both about Wall Street? Similar movie!"
radarsat1 t1_jas37b1 wrote
Reply to [D] Is there an ML project out there that recommends movies based on more than the usual features? by of_a_varsity_athlete
Honestly, probably GPT with the right prompt, assuming it's already read every movie review out there. Might take some work to figure out that prompt though.
pogsly t1_jarzom0 wrote
!remind me 1 day
Bluebotlabs t1_jarufrq wrote
Reply to comment by minimaxir in [D] OpenAI introduces ChatGPT and Whisper APIs (ChatGPT API is 1/10th the cost of GPT-3 API) by minimaxir
My mistake, I was confused with the system I was.using for chat history lol
minimaxir OP t1_jaru4ch wrote
Reply to comment by Bluebotlabs in [D] OpenAI introduces ChatGPT and Whisper APIs (ChatGPT API is 1/10th the cost of GPT-3 API) by minimaxir
More cumulatively than exponentially but yes.
With the new prices that's not a big deal.
[deleted] t1_jarmz1h wrote
Reply to comment by Im2bored17 in [D] OpenAI introduces ChatGPT and Whisper APIs (ChatGPT API is 1/10th the cost of GPT-3 API) by minimaxir
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jarkcfb wrote
Reply to comment by qqYn7PIE57zkf6kn in [D] OpenAI introduces ChatGPT and Whisper APIs (ChatGPT API is 1/10th the cost of GPT-3 API) by minimaxir
[deleted]
NoLifeGamer2 t1_jarju3y wrote
Reply to comment by BitterAd9531 in [D] offline speech to text - trainable by AlexSpace3
Isn't that online?
[deleted] t1_jarj0kn wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] OpenAI introduces ChatGPT and Whisper APIs (ChatGPT API is 1/10th the cost of GPT-3 API) by minimaxir
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jarikhz wrote
Reply to comment by Hsemar in [D] OpenAI introduces ChatGPT and Whisper APIs (ChatGPT API is 1/10th the cost of GPT-3 API) by minimaxir
[deleted]
EricHallahan t1_jarcwg0 wrote
Reply to comment by badabummbadabing in [N] EleutherAI has formed a non-profit by StellaAthena
I do not expect anything other than Apache 2.0 or MIT (our go-to licenses) for code and checkpoints. Data is a bit harder, but we will always try to release everything under the most permissive license we can.
EricHallahan t1_jar9qm1 wrote
Reply to comment by Fuehnix in [N] EleutherAI has formed a non-profit by StellaAthena
Yes, come on in! We do not expect contributors to devote massive amounts of time or go out of their way to contribute—they all have lives of their own, and we respect that.
As for collaboration, we make it work. Most communication is asynchronous text, which is quite versatile and hides varied schedules well.
Bluebotlabs t1_jar58e4 wrote
Reply to [D] OpenAI introduces ChatGPT and Whisper APIs (ChatGPT API is 1/10th the cost of GPT-3 API) by minimaxir
Doesn't the number of tokens increase exponentially with chat history?
badabummbadabing t1_jar3uab wrote
Reply to [N] EleutherAI has formed a non-profit by StellaAthena
Going forward, under which licences are you going to release your code/weights/data?
WarAndGeese t1_jaqz7b1 wrote
Reply to comment by WarAndGeese in [N] EleutherAI has formed a non-profit by StellaAthena
These things need to be free and open source, not have some profit motive to them. As soon as that day comes means interest in the project is lost and people will look for some other 'free' or 'eleuther' project.
WarAndGeese t1_jaqz31a wrote
Reply to comment by currentscurrents in [N] EleutherAI has formed a non-profit by StellaAthena
Why? That would be the end of it. If your comment was sarcastic then pardon my overreaction.
RemindMeBot t1_jaqul2z wrote
Reply to comment by eveesbby in [P] A minimal framework for image diffusion (including high-resolution) by mikonvergence
I will be messaging you in 1 day on 2023-03-04 11:57:33 UTC to remind you of this link
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
^(Parent commenter can ) ^(delete this message to hide from others.)
| ^(Info) | ^(Custom) | ^(Your Reminders) | ^(Feedback) |
|---|
eveesbby t1_jaquiqj wrote
!remind me 1 day
sea-shunned t1_jaqosa2 wrote
Reply to comment by PassionatePossum in [D] Are Genetic Algorithms Dead? by TobusFire
In my experience, if you are "stepping around more or less blindly" then the problem & EA have not been properly formulated. In general of course, if a gradient is available then gradient descent will do a better job >99% of the time.
Though with a bit of domain knowledge, and/or some careful design of the objective function(s), variation operators etc., an EA can be a pretty efficient explorer of the space. It's nichely-applicable, but when done properly it's far from blind.
[deleted] t1_jaqcd0a wrote
Reply to comment by StellaAthena in [N] EleutherAI has formed a non-profit by StellaAthena
[deleted]
filipposML t1_jaq6whb wrote
Reply to comment by mmmniple in [D] Are Genetic Algorithms Dead? by TobusFire
Cheers
hoshitoshi t1_jasnojt wrote
Reply to [R] High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity by SleekEagle
This will be very useful for brain researchers (and scarily interrogators). I wonder if you could do a similar thing and use an LLM to extract text/language from MRI imaging to read what a person is actually thinking.