You just need a notion of a fitness function and then you can apply permutations to the tokens.

I'm all for prompt engineering in general, it's like programming but in english.

But selling a prompt? Lol.

Wow, looks interesting!

They have a list of projects and / or ideas pinned to some of their channels. If you want something to happen then you're expected to be pro-active and lead (or follow someone else who is leading); it's the only way this kind of collaboration can work. Tbf it's very hard to collaborate among people on different time zones with their own schedules but they somehow make it work.

Here's hoping they never become ClosedAI 🥂

The discord seems intimidatingly huge with 20k+ members, and 3000 online...

Is it really feasible to collaborate and communicate with the group?

I have a B.S. in CS+Linguistics from UIUC, but I had some life and financial complications that blocked me from grad school. I sorted those things out recently, but now I'm trying to find people to do NLP research with so I can be competitive when I apply for Fall 2024 in December.

I'm somewhere in between a senior CS student and first year grad student right now probably.

What does system message mean?

No way. They're still one of the best bets out there for high-dimensional discrete optimization.

> But wouldn't the ChatGPT embeddings still be better? Given that they're cheap, why not use the better option?

Usually, to get the best embeddings, you need to train them somewhat differently than you do a "normal" LLM. So ChatGPT may not(?) be "best" right now, for that application.

[removed]

Yes, they pair up perfectly. Whisper detects anything I babble to it, english or french and it's surprisingly fast. I've wrapped a loop that:

listens micro -> whisper STT -> chatgpt -> lang detect -> Google TTS -> speaker

With noise/silence detection, it's a complete hands-off experience, like chatting with a real person. Delay is ~ 5s for all calls. "Glueing" the APIs is straightforward and intuitive.

Prompt engineers

[removed]

Sorry but this probably isn’t the right sub for this

Nice, nothing demonstrates the Dunning-Kruger effect quite like a string of insults.

For whatever its worth, that argument is exceedingly weak. I'll let you brainstorm on why that might be. I don't have interest in debating with someone who so obviously lacks tact.

[removed]

This is the least imaginative use of chatGPT I’ve seen yet

it can be fine tuned as far as I've heard although I've only used it for regular english

Can it be trained to add extra specialized words?

Other than randomly dropping punctuation and hallucinating words every so often for no apparent reason, it's extremely accurate.

>They are making money somehow

Extremely doubtful. Microsoft went in for $10B at a $29B valuation. We have seen pre-revenue companies IPO for far more than that. Microsoft's $10B deal is probably the only thing keeping them afloat.

>Hence the space is ripe for tons of competition

I think you should look up which big tech companies already offer chatbots. You'll find the space is already very competitive. Sure, they aren't large, generative language models, but they target the B2C market that ChatGPT is attempting to compete in.

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

To be fair, they are technically very competent and the pricing is very cheap. And their marketing is great.

But yeah dealing with B2B customers (where the money is) and integrating feedback from them is a very different thing than what they've been doing so far. They might be angling to serve as a platform for AI companies that then have to deal with average customers. That way they get to only deal with people who understand the limitations of AI. Could work. Will change the company to be less researchy though.