Recent comments in /f/MachineLearning
InfamousClyde t1_ja93zvt wrote
Reply to comment by xFreaki in [N] New 1.0 release of Deep Graph Library (DGL) by jermainewang
Haha, I'm using PyG for my MASc thesis at the moment. Maybe scope it out a bit; the PyG slack channel is very active and super helpful.
CireNeikual t1_ja93iae wrote
Reply to comment by Jonas_SV in [P] Basic autodiff library for scalar values in C by JanBitesTheDust
I would actually recommend Cython over C types, it's nicer especially when it comes to handling numpy arrays.
[deleted] OP t1_ja93cyo wrote
[deleted] OP t1_ja938ts wrote
JiraSuxx2 t1_ja932j8 wrote
Reply to [D] What do you think of this AI ethics professor suggestion to force into law the requirement of a license to use AI like chatGPT since it's "potentially dangerous"? by [deleted]
AI is a technology so powerful that countries that ‘pause’ it will be at a disadvantage quickly. Not likely to happen.
A driver’s license to use it? A pretty vague suggestion if you ask me. How would that work exactly?
po-handz t1_ja92mix wrote
Reply to [D] What do you think of this AI ethics professor suggestion to force into law the requirement of a license to use AI like chatGPT since it's "potentially dangerous"? by [deleted]
That's the dumbest take I've ever heard
This prof probably thinks the war on drugs has been successful
Unlikely_Tie8166 t1_ja8xpmh wrote
Reply to [D] CVPR Rebuttal scores are out! by ElPelana
I once reviewed a cvpr submission that had overwhelmingly positive scores before rebuttal, and overwhelmingly negative after. Sometimes it's best to not do rebuttal at all lol
JanBitesTheDust OP t1_ja8xmsf wrote
Reply to comment by halffloat in [P] Basic autodiff library for scalar values in C by JanBitesTheDust
Wow that is impressive. I skimmed through their paper and did not really understand how they implemented it. Nonetheless, it would be cool to try and implement it myself.
walk-the-rock t1_ja8w92x wrote
Reply to comment by _der_erlkonig_ in [R] Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families by MysteryInc152
oh my mistake
the rest of it stands though
bombay_doors t1_ja8vq1m wrote
Reply to comment by synonymous1964 in [D] CVPR Rebuttal scores are out! by ElPelana
It's a shame, even I can't attend. Why do they even have conferences in Canada. It's like Canada don't like ze money from conferences.
kweu t1_ja8ur2q wrote
Reply to [D] Training a UNet-like architecture for semantic segmentation with 200 outcome classes. by Scared_Employer6992
I work with data of similar size and I use random crops during training and a sliding window for prediction. For example you could train to segment 128x128-sized crops of the input images, then put the predictions together to segment the image at full resolution and keep your 200 classes probably. But tbh 200 sounds a bit excessive anyway
Jonas_SV t1_ja8tpxw wrote
Reply to comment by JanBitesTheDust in [P] Basic autodiff library for scalar values in C by JanBitesTheDust
Not too bad, check the python C types API
bballerkt7 t1_ja8qvcj wrote
Reply to [D] CVPR Rebuttal scores are out! by ElPelana
Are the reviews public? If so, where can I see them? (I didn’t submit anything just curious to look through some reviews)
ElPelana OP t1_ja8q9iy wrote
Reply to comment by synonymous1964 in [D] CVPR Rebuttal scores are out! by ElPelana
I still cannot believe that getting a Canadian visa is harder than the US visa
[deleted] t1_ja8q4d8 wrote
Reply to [D] CVPR Rebuttal scores are out! by ElPelana
[deleted]
xFreaki t1_ja8pgws wrote
I'm using it on my masters thesis atm. Having problems because of a deprecated feature without replacement (g sampling)
synonymous1964 t1_ja8ormp wrote
Reply to comment by ElPelana in [D] CVPR Rebuttal scores are out! by ElPelana
nice rebuttal!
synonymous1964 t1_ja8opaq wrote
Reply to [D] CVPR Rebuttal scores are out! by ElPelana
Now I just need to hope that my Canadian visa doesn't actually take 209 days to process...
Honestly needing a visa to attend conferences is a big disadvantage - networking at conferences leads to future employment and research opportunities, and can have a huge impact on the career of early-stage researchers.
halffloat t1_ja8o7s0 wrote
Cool work! You might also enjoy tapenade (tapenade.inria.fr:8080) which takes a C file and then produces a new C source file with the derivative program. It's useful when you want compiled derivatives. I use this a lot for optimization problems; never tried it for NNs, though.
Interesting_Year_201 t1_ja8nqtk wrote
Reply to comment by ElPelana in [D] CVPR Rebuttal scores are out! by ElPelana
Had same original scores, but after rebuttal it became three rejects lol
ElPelana OP t1_ja8nk9h wrote
Reply to [D] CVPR Rebuttal scores are out! by ElPelana
Got my paper accepted!! Original scores: 1 weak accept, 1 borderline and 1 weak reject. After rebuttal, got 3 weak accepts.
External_Juice_8140 t1_ja8e485 wrote
Reply to [Discussion] Can you use a model trained on tweets/product reviews to do sentiment analysis on IT support tickets? by [deleted]
Nobody can just answer this question.
Predict a set of data using the pre trained model. Then, predict the same set of data, manually by a human.
Compare the results. How accurate was the model compared to a human?
coconautico OP t1_ja8dbew wrote
Reply to comment by sebzim4500 in [P] [N] Democratizing the chatGPT technology through a Q&A game by coconautico
No, I don't, because even if chatGPT could answer my question correctly, that doesn't mean that another assistant could.
Therefore, when I come up with a question that, from my point of view could be challenging to answer by a virtual assistant, and regardless of whether I have searched Google/Reddit/StackOverflow/ChatGPT/... for the answer, I end up typing it on OpenAssistant, (again, just my question).
cthorrez t1_ja8d6oc wrote
Reply to comment by gniorg in [D] Is RL dead/worth researching these days? by [deleted]
Not exactly. In batch RL the data they train on are real (state, action, next state, reward) tuples from real agents interacting with real environments.
They improve the policy offline. In RLHF there actually is no env. And the policy is just standard LLM decoding.
currentscurrents t1_ja94y4s wrote
Reply to [D] What do you think of this AI ethics professor suggestion to force into law the requirement of a license to use AI like chatGPT since it's "potentially dangerous"? by [deleted]
"AI ethics professor" isn't a real thing.
Ethics isn't even the kind of thing you can be an expert in; anybody calling themselves an ethics expert has declared themselves the arbiter of right and wrong.