Recent comments in /f/MachineLearning
Ok_Dependent1131 t1_j92ftfi wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
this history of human advancements weren't intentional - vulcanization, xrays, microwave ovens...
liquiddandruff t1_j92fnve wrote
Reply to comment by Ulfgardleo in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
confidently wrong https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02083
Borrowedshorts t1_j92el1y wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
Not necessarily, and at least you can ensure higher quality discussion. Places like this with high member count inevitably get inundated with pop sci bs, politics, or irrelevant personal experiences. That's what has happened to the science, physics, and economics subs.
PedroColo t1_j92dcff wrote
Reply to [D] Please stop by [deleted]
I agree with that. I’m recently graduated as Informatics/Computer AI Engineer and I’m starting in Machine Learning. So this subreddit is incredible for learn and discover interesting things. And I noticed how the recents posts are a bit StackOverflow stupid questions xD
Ulfgardleo t1_j92cwoy wrote
Reply to comment by medwatt in [D] Short survey of optimization methods by medwatt
optimisation is a the worst field to skip the nitty gritty details. Optimisation is all about details.
​
your question is unspecified. "optimisation" in ML is a very different beast than optimisation in the math sense.
BronzeArcher t1_j92curo wrote
Reply to [D] Please stop by [deleted]
I hope this isn’t referring to the discussion post I made yesterday… lmfao
Top-Perspective2560 t1_j92c6w4 wrote
Reply to [D] Please stop by [deleted]
I’m aware that this is due to a high workload for the person moderating the sub, but I’d suggest a simple moratorium on chatGPT posts might be a good starting point. I believe you can automate that fairly easily based on post titles.
Kerbal634 t1_j92bt3g wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
Stopping discussion is interfering more than participating in low level discussion
mlresearchoor t1_j92bdan wrote
Reply to [D] Please stop by [deleted]
the crypto and NFT crowd just discovered AI, are clueless, and are starting AI companies
[deleted] OP t1_j92av5k wrote
Reply to comment by Borrowedshorts in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted] OP t1_j92aiod wrote
Reply to [D] Please stop by [deleted]
[removed]
symbiont t1_j929o2q wrote
Reply to [D] Please stop by [deleted]
A similar phenomenon is happening inside big tech companies. Innovation that would otherwise be innovative now isn't because it isn't powered by an LLM.
dataslacker t1_j926win wrote
Reply to [D] Please stop by [deleted]
Use the down vote button people. I think people just scroll by them
__lawless t1_j926m4d wrote
Reply to comment by dojoteef in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
Can you add some rules to not let 1 day old accounts post. Also not let people post immediately after joining.
aspoj t1_j923sxj wrote
Reply to comment by cass1o in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
Not like one could just do it if one wanted. Questions like "how do we make it self aware" are interesting topics and definitively difficult unanswered questions as of today.
[deleted] t1_j923mho wrote
Reply to comment by TheGamingPhoenix_000 in [D] Simple Questions Thread by AutoModerator
[deleted]
ilovethrills t1_j923i8t wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
Google employee?
afireohno t1_j9230xx wrote
Reply to [D] Formalising information flow in NN by bjergerk1ng
There are two lines of work that come to mind you might be interested in.
- Geometric deep learning primarily studies various types of invariances (translation, permutation, etc) that can be encoded in DL architectures.
- Algorithmic alignment studies the relationship between information flow in classical algorithms and DL architectures and how "aligning" the latter to the former can improve performance.
Edit: Spelling
maxToTheJ t1_j9230jn wrote
Reply to comment by LcuBeatsWorking in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
Its always been there. This sub because of the sheer numbers game is flooded by non practitioners. It used to be worse because in the past OP would have been downvoted to hell
XecutionStyle t1_j922qne wrote
Reply to comment by Anti-Queen_Elle in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
I don't know
NotARedditUser3 t1_j9225b5 wrote
Reply to comment by a1_jakesauce_ in [D] What are the worst ethical considerations of large language models? by BronzeArcher
I'll reply back with what I was referring to later, it was a different thing
TheGamingPhoenix_000 t1_j921z2o wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] Simple Questions Thread by AutoModerator
That just explains the api usage tho, not the actual reasoning and how they do the math. Like on section 5, they create a model but don’t actually explain the parameters they use. Like why do they use a dense layer instead of something else, why do they use the adam optimizer, etc.
I don’t understand what all the terms mean, dense, lstm, optimizers, and stuff, I want to find out what these all mean and when to use then
blueSGL t1_j921j8u wrote
Reply to comment by Optimal-Asshole in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
> Be the change you want to see in the subreddit.
For that to work I'd need to script up a bot, sign up to multiple VPNs, curate an army of aged accounts and flag from a control panel new low quality posts to be steadily hit with downvotes, and upvotes to be given to new high quality posts.
Otherwise you are just fighting with the masses that are upvoting posts that are causing the problems and ignoring higher quality posts.
Thought provoking 2 hour in depth podcast with AI researchers working at the coal face: 8 upvotes, Yet another ChatGPT screenshot: hundreds of votes.
This is an issue on every sub on reddit.
[deleted] OP t1_j921gkz wrote
Reply to comment by Borrowedshorts in [D] Please stop by [deleted]
[removed]
t1ku2ri37gd2ubne t1_j92gvwh wrote
Reply to comment by mindmech in [D] Quality of posts in this sub going down by MurlocXYZ
I accomplish that by using a ton of keyword filters for different political terms. Any post by people I follow that includes political keywords gets filtered out and I’m left with the relevant stuff.