Recent comments in /f/MachineLearning
krzme t1_j7i0to8 wrote
Reply to comment by st8ic in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Given the volume of false information that Google gives hints to…
trias10 t1_j7i0pq3 wrote
Reply to comment by klop2031 in [N] Getty Images sues AI art generator Stable Diffusion in the US for copyright infringement by Wiskkey
I personally don't care a whit about Stable Diffusion. AI should be going after rote, boring tasks via automation, not creativity and art. That's the one thing actually enjoyable about life, and the last thing we should be automating with stupid models that are just scaled matrix multiplication.
Meddhouib10 t1_j7hz0ve wrote
Reply to comment by gevorgter in [P] I have implemented an RL agent for trading EUR/USD and I don't know what to do next... by Kiizmod0
Yes tou need to model the word to make an AI work in any financial application
klop2031 t1_j7hyv7h wrote
Reply to comment by trias10 in [N] Getty Images sues AI art generator Stable Diffusion in the US for copyright infringement by Wiskkey
Nah, thats not good. Who cares about getty... no one... let science move forward
[deleted] t1_j7hyr6a wrote
Reply to comment by PHEEEEELLLLLEEEEP in [N] Getty Images sues AI art generator Stable Diffusion in the US for copyright infringement by Wiskkey
[deleted]
xtime595 t1_j7hyhbw wrote
Reply to comment by trias10 in [N] Getty Images sues AI art generator Stable Diffusion in the US for copyright infringement by Wiskkey
Ah yes, I love it when corporations decide to halt scientific progress
Sirisian t1_j7hy8td wrote
Reply to comment by st8ic in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Google already has a knowledge graph which can be used to guard against common mistakes ChatGPT makes with trivia and basic information. Using such a system it's possible to prevent faults in the model and potentially stop some hallucination that can occur.
I've been hoping to see one of these companies construct and reference a complete probabilistic temporal knowledge graph. The bigger topic is being able to go from entity relationships back to training data sources to examine potential faults. I digress, this is a large topic, but it's something I've been very interested in seeing, especially since information can have a complex history with a lot of relationships. (Not just for our real timeline either. Every book has its own timeline of changing information that such a system should be able to unravel).
Striking-Travel-6649 t1_j7hx5tb wrote
Reply to comment by noobgolang in [D] Is English the optimal language to train NLP models on? by MrOfficialCandy
"I wonder if we should be using a human language at all"
My response: 01101000 01100101 01101100 01101100 01101111 00101100 00100000 01101111 01110101 01101110 00100001
djbange t1_j7hwpjb wrote
Reply to comment by JustOneAvailableName in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Google is only getting out in front of Microsoft, who apparently has an announcement regarding Bing and chatGPT scheduled for tomorrow.
gevorgter t1_j7hwg1u wrote
Reply to comment by lifesthateasy in [P] I have implemented an RL agent for trading EUR/USD and I don't know what to do next... by Kiizmod0
This....
A lot of people do not understand that AI is actually pattern seeking algorithm.
If you get random sequence of numbers there is no pattern. Hence there is no way for AI to predict next number.
So for example AI is useless playing lottery. Stock market is another useless AI application unless you manage to feed your system thousands of "features" like news, who said what, what blew up where....
trias10 t1_j7huwpk wrote
Reply to [N] Getty Images sues AI art generator Stable Diffusion in the US for copyright infringement by Wiskkey
Good, hopefully Getty wins.
mirrorcoloured t1_j7hum3j wrote
Reply to comment by HoneyChilliPotato7 in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
I think this says more about you than Google.
SimonJDPrince t1_j7htrs8 wrote
Reply to comment by 42gauge in [D] Understanding Vision Transformer (ViT) - What are the prerequisites? by SAbdusSamad
Pretty much nothing to get through the first half. High school calculus and a basic grasp of probability. Should be accessible to almost everyone. Second half needs more knowledge of probability, but I'm filling out appendices with this info.
lifesthateasy t1_j7htmui wrote
Reply to [P] I have implemented an RL agent for trading EUR/USD and I don't know what to do next... by Kiizmod0
Stock prices are a random walk, so even if you get tricked by good scores on your training data, you'll most probably lose money when you start to use your model to actually trade.
cdrwolfe t1_j7ht7uy wrote
Reply to [P] I have implemented an RL agent for trading EUR/USD and I don't know what to do next... by Kiizmod0
Lose money?
[deleted] t1_j7hsccf wrote
mettle t1_j7hrck0 wrote
Reply to comment by yeluapyeroc in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
is it though? how would you even do that? i think if you have that actually figured out, it's easily a $1b idea.
st8ic t1_j7hquaz wrote
Reply to comment by yeluapyeroc in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
> Its a trivial configuration option to prevent OpenAI models from hallucinating answers and have them respond with an "I don't know" equivalent.
How?
new_name_who_dis_ t1_j7hpz3q wrote
Reply to comment by Zyansheep in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Well if you see variety in the top results in google that might give you pause. But you're not getting that from ChatGPT
here_we_go_beep_boop t1_j7hpycy wrote
Reply to comment by HoneyChilliPotato7 in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Yep, the entire result space is utterly polluted by SEO trash
telebierro t1_j7hovot wrote
Funny how often he had to mention that they've been working on AI for years and how they used to be the pioneers. Like a hipster crying for props.
ktpr t1_j7ho1vo wrote
Reply to comment by st8ic in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
They don’t care that much about what ChatGPT will do search. They care about the advertising users of ChatGPT won’t be seeing.
choHZ t1_j7hnrtc wrote
I get that he is annoyed that people believe ChatGPT is such a milestone breakthrough unique to OpenAI. It is not, since most big players already have or capable of having LLM tuned to similar capabilities. Yet from the InstructGPT paper, the way they label their data is nothing that any big players can't handle. I also get that he is pissed when people praise OpenAI for its "openness" — OpenAI is absolutely not a fan for the whole open source movement, though maybe reasonably so.
My question is why don't the big players give their bots similar exposure? I find it hard to believe that ethics and some internet critics to be the only reasons.
VelveteenAmbush t1_j7hn77a wrote
Reply to comment by farmingvillein in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
OpenAI is powering Bing's forthcoming AI features
[deleted] t1_j7i15sy wrote
Reply to comment by VelveteenAmbush in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
[deleted]