Recent comments in /f/MachineLearning

trias10 t1_j7i0pq3 wrote

I personally don't care a whit about Stable Diffusion. AI should be going after rote, boring tasks via automation, not creativity and art. That's the one thing actually enjoyable about life, and the last thing we should be automating with stupid models that are just scaled matrix multiplication.

−12

Sirisian t1_j7hy8td wrote

Google already has a knowledge graph which can be used to guard against common mistakes ChatGPT makes with trivia and basic information. Using such a system it's possible to prevent faults in the model and potentially stop some hallucination that can occur.

I've been hoping to see one of these companies construct and reference a complete probabilistic temporal knowledge graph. The bigger topic is being able to go from entity relationships back to training data sources to examine potential faults. I digress, this is a large topic, but it's something I've been very interested in seeing, especially since information can have a complex history with a lot of relationships. (Not just for our real timeline either. Every book has its own timeline of changing information that such a system should be able to unravel).

41

gevorgter t1_j7hwg1u wrote

This....

A lot of people do not understand that AI is actually pattern seeking algorithm.

If you get random sequence of numbers there is no pattern. Hence there is no way for AI to predict next number.

So for example AI is useless playing lottery. Stock market is another useless AI application unless you manage to feed your system thousands of "features" like news, who said what, what blew up where....

3

choHZ t1_j7hnrtc wrote

I get that he is annoyed that people believe ChatGPT is such a milestone breakthrough unique to OpenAI. It is not, since most big players already have or capable of having LLM tuned to similar capabilities. Yet from the InstructGPT paper, the way they label their data is nothing that any big players can't handle. I also get that he is pissed when people praise OpenAI for its "openness" — OpenAI is absolutely not a fan for the whole open source movement, though maybe reasonably so.

My question is why don't the big players give their bots similar exposure? I find it hard to believe that ethics and some internet critics to be the only reasons.

2