Recent comments in /f/MachineLearning
stml t1_j7hlueg wrote
Reply to comment by st8ic in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
It's not like Google vets the websites that show up in Google searches all that well regardless.
[deleted] t1_j7hlj4r wrote
Reply to [D] What techniques can I use to tell if a problem is likely enough to be solved by ML so as to justify compiling the dataset? by SnuggleWuggleSleep
Without sharing much details about the specific problem its going to be difficult to give proper feedback/advice.
Some questions you can ask yourself:
- Can a human solve the problem? How skilled does the human have to be?
- Do you think you will need fancy architectures to train a model or is assembling the data the hard part and modelling will be easy? How easy? Basically the question is is assembling the data the risk or is modelling the risk?
- Have others tried? Why are you so convinced that you can make money solving the problem? If you are so convinced, then why have others not tried?
yeluapyeroc t1_j7hliu2 wrote
Reply to comment by bballerkt7 in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
They absolutely will include the light version into their search results for free. I doubt the model training tools for developers will be free, though.
yeluapyeroc t1_j7hlb5v wrote
Reply to comment by st8ic in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Its a trivial configuration option to prevent OpenAI models from hallucinating answers and have them respond with an "I don't know" equivalent. I'm sure Google sees way beyond the novelty of the current publicly accessible ChatGPT model.
bortlip t1_j7hl3ik wrote
I had chatGPT summarize this:
ChatGPT is eating our lunch. We're announcing that we intend to work on something real soon in an attempt to look proactive and not fall behind.
JackandFred t1_j7hkrwq wrote
Reply to comment by new_name_who_dis_ in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
I like to tell people Gpt is more like writing an essay for English class or the sat than a research paper for a history class. It cares about grammatical correctness, readability is a better way to put that, that’s how you’re graded in English. It’s not graded on accuracy or truth. For the sat they used to say you can make up quotes for the essay section because they’re grading the writing, not the content. (I realize that’s dated, I don’t think they do an essay anymore)
RingoCatKeeper t1_j7hklu4 wrote
Reply to comment by mostlyhydrogen in [D] Querying with multiple vectors during embedding nearest neighbor search? by mostlyhydrogen
Sorry I miss understood. You're right.
mskogly t1_j7hk0jo wrote
Hm, feels a bit desperate. And interesting that he didnt link to any of their projects, nor to the closed Bard beta. For a company that invented page rank, that seems just weird.
HoneyChilliPotato7 t1_j7hjq1u wrote
Reply to comment by here_we_go_beep_boop in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Lmaoo
HoneyChilliPotato7 t1_j7hjnif wrote
Reply to comment by JustOneAvailableName in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
True, I don't remember the last time I used Google search without adding reddit at the end
[deleted] t1_j7hjm4p wrote
blablanonymous t1_j7hjlhe wrote
Reply to comment by po-handz in [N] GitHub CEO on why open source developers should be exempt from the EU’s AI Act by EmbarrassedHelp
They don’t start like that. It takes time to pile up enough problems on a human for them to become addict or mentally ill
Zyansheep t1_j7hjddh wrote
Reply to comment by new_name_who_dis_ in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Google search responses may be made up as well, its just a matter of there being more than one source to go through which makes it easier to spot potential discrepancies in any one source ;)
here_we_go_beep_boop t1_j7hic2w wrote
Hey ChatGPT, please write me a blog post announcing a bunch of new AI things from Google without mentionimg ChatGPT or letting them smell our fear
pryoslice t1_j7hhykn wrote
Reply to comment by bballerkt7 in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
I think they will. Their goal is to drive traffic.
visarga t1_j7hhqvc wrote
Reply to comment by sinavski in [D] List of Large Language Models to play with. by sinavski
Does Bloom do tasks? is it well behaved?
[deleted] t1_j7hh9bl wrote
Reply to comment by bballerkt7 in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
[removed]
bballerkt7 t1_j7hh7ri wrote
Reply to comment by trendafili in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Yeah now that I think about they’ll probably have free access that is limited and a subscription plan for more features like google colab
new_name_who_dis_ t1_j7hh479 wrote
Reply to comment by st8ic in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Well obviously. Search is a tool for information retrieval (mostly). If you have an oracle, it's much more convenient than digging through the source material and doing the research yourself, even when it is presented to you in most relevant first order, which is the most convenient order and what made google successful in the first place.
But yes, anyone reading please don't use ChatGPT instead of google search unless you don't care about the responses being made up.
JustOneAvailableName t1_j7hh2yv wrote
Reply to comment by mugbrushteeth in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Their main source of revenue is seriously threatened by a 10-50M(?) investment. It might not be OpenAI, but something will replace Google in the coming years if Google doesn't innovate their search.
[deleted] t1_j7hh25u wrote
Reply to comment by st8ic in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
[deleted]
trendafili t1_j7hgxbu wrote
Reply to comment by bballerkt7 in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
They offer everything else for free
farmingvillein t1_j7hgqs3 wrote
Reply to comment by mugbrushteeth in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Really more about bing...which is a statement which seems kinda crazy to write...
visarga t1_j7hgmc3 wrote
Reply to comment by mugbrushteeth in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
It's not their large model, it's a toy model. Expect lower quality.
> This much smaller model requires significantly less computing power, enabling us to scale to more users
PHEEEEELLLLLEEEEP t1_j7hm3td wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [N] Getty Images sues AI art generator Stable Diffusion in the US for copyright infringement by Wiskkey
Top legal mind of reddit