Recent comments in /f/MachineLearning
deathisnear t1_j6sflmh wrote
Reply to [Project] What architecture would be more appropriate for a reinforcement learning algorithm on a turn-based board game? by jtpaquet
Why not use standard search algorithms for this? Why do you need to use reinforcement learning?
Nhabls t1_j6sbq3i wrote
Reply to comment by RandomCandor in [R] Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by starstruckmon
The arms race has been going for over a decade now...
Infinite-Recover-712 t1_j6s8uaj wrote
1bir t1_j6s0ito wrote
Reply to [D] Audio segmentation - Machine Learning algorithm to segment a audio file into multiple class by PlayfulMenu1395
Possible solution:
- train minirocket/hydra, which were designed for time series classification, on the labelled dataset (probably as four one-vs-many problems, eg s1 vs the rest, s2 vs the rest etc)
- you'll get sets of 1D convolutional kernels; these can be convolved with time series of any length
- only one of these should 'fire' strongly for each different heartbeat phase, so you should get univariate signals for each phase
- convolve these kernel sets with your unsegmented data
- segment the data based on the strongest signal corresponding to the relevant phase of the heartbeat.
You may need to apply some transformations to the signals to get this to work well though (eg softmax &/ smoothing, or some kind of changepoint detection, which I don't know much about).
logTom OP t1_j6rq944 wrote
Reply to comment by smyliest in [R] SETI finds eight potential alien signals with ML by logTom
All data used in this paper are stored as high-resolution FILTERBANK and HDF5 format collected and generated from observations by the Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope, which are available through the Breakthrough Listen Open Data Archive at http://seti.berkeley.edu/opendata.
smyliest t1_j6rlgp9 wrote
Do we have large data sets for alien signals to train model?
codename_failure t1_j6riypw wrote
Reply to comment by IsABot-Ban in [R] Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by starstruckmon
Well done, little AI!
mlresearchoor t1_j6r93hm wrote
Reply to comment by RandomCandor in [R] Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by starstruckmon
we got front-row seats to this race and a chance to participate, +1 great time to be alive
mlresearchoor t1_j6r8x7y wrote
Reply to [R] Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by starstruckmon
nice find! would be helpful, as well, to compare with similar papers from 2022 that this paper cites, but did not compare to in results section
("We note that our work is concurrent with Chen et al. (2022) and Gao et al. (2022), both generating the reasoning chain in Python code and calling a Python interpreter to derive the answer. While we do not compare with them empirically since they are not yet published...")
Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks (Chen)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12588
PAL: Program-aided Language Models (Gao)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10435
logTom OP t1_j6r8t7a wrote
Reply to comment by Soft-Material3294 in [R] SETI finds eight potential alien signals with ML by logTom
I'm wondering too. We'll see if these repeat. It would be great if they did. I thought this is a cool application of AI/machine learning though.
Soft-Material3294 t1_j6r3pvy wrote
I wonder what’s the probability that these signals were naturally occurring
IsABot-Ban t1_j6qxhi3 wrote
Reply to comment by Acceptable-Cress-374 in [R] Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by starstruckmon
Remember we look at where it will be a few papers down the road.
Acceptable-Cress-374 t1_j6qutn3 wrote
Reply to comment by RandomCandor in [R] Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by starstruckmon
Hold on to your papers!
RandomCandor t1_j6qr7t0 wrote
Reply to [R] Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by starstruckmon
Man, i feel like we're living the beginning an arms race of AI.
What a time to be alive! ( Like one of my favorite YouTubers would say)
Eresbonitaguey t1_j6qic3n wrote
Reply to [D] Audio segmentation - Machine Learning algorithm to segment a audio file into multiple class by PlayfulMenu1395
Possibly not the ideal solution but I would suggest taking sections of the spectrogram as images (perhaps with overlap) and feeding that into a multi-label classifier. If you’re after a bounding box then the upper and lower bounds should be apparent based on the location of your classes within the spectrogram i.e. sound intensity occurs at similar frequency. If transfer learning from a general image model I would advise against using false colour to generate the three channels and instead would generate different types of spectrograms (Reassignment method/Multi-tapered/etc.) Due to the nature of spectrograms you don’t really want scale invariance so segmentation models that use feature pyramids can be problematic. I found decent success using Compact Convolutional Transformers but that may not be what you need for your task.
Alternative-Prize612 t1_j6q4zal wrote
Reply to [R] Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by starstruckmon
Amazing, thanks for posting.
rottoneuro t1_j6pgwnp wrote
Reply to comment by fakesoicansayshit in [D] 5 Growing Libraries in Python for Causality Analysis by pasticciociccio
which approach in particular? I am also interested, can you share the reference?
lukemtesta t1_j6pf223 wrote
AFAIK neural networks are best for modelling a function of some parameters. In contrast regime detection in financial systems prefer Gradient-Boosted Trees, Random Forests and markov chains. Autoregressive models such as ARMA, ARIMA and GARCH utilise regression, while game regression tests favour reinforcement learning techniques.
It depends on the application basically.
Comfortable_Slip4025 t1_j6parh8 wrote
I just worked on a quartet search tree project to create optimal evolutionary trees. So, not dead yet!
BeautyInUgly OP t1_j6p747j wrote
Reply to comment by TypicalFeeling8465 in [D] Meta AI Residency 2023 by BeautyInUgly
Thank you for the update
Zetsu-Eiyu-O OP t1_j6p49di wrote
Reply to comment by MysteryInc152 in [D] Generative Model FOr Facts Extraction by Zetsu-Eiyu-O
thank you so much! I will drop you a message once I'm at my desk.
bananonymos t1_j6p46d4 wrote
Reply to comment by DisWastingMyTime in [D] Have researchers given up on traditional machine learning methods? by fujidaiti
No problem usually when I point out this people call me names and block me. Thanks random internet person.
DisWastingMyTime t1_j6p3xrr wrote
Reply to comment by bananonymos in [D] Have researchers given up on traditional machine learning methods? by fujidaiti
You're right, that was out of place, I apologize.
bananonymos t1_j6p3k52 wrote
Reply to comment by DisWastingMyTime in [D] Have researchers given up on traditional machine learning methods? by fujidaiti
What crawled up your butt?
OP asked if ML was going away in place of AI.
My response is that many people still use linear regressions for problems.
Idiot responds hope they stop. That’s like saying we shouldn’t use cash because credit cards or phone wallets are better.
Underlying many ML and AI models are regression models. That’s all I said. Nothing about reducing everything to its basic parts. But something bothered you enough to basically insult me and make assumptions. Did someone like that make you feel inadequate enough to harass strangers?
Dare I say you must be fun at parties and before you respond back. Yeah I know Im not.
jtpaquet OP t1_j6sgfhj wrote
Reply to comment by deathisnear in [Project] What architecture would be more appropriate for a reinforcement learning algorithm on a turn-based board game? by jtpaquet
I don't think I understand what you mean by search algorithm. The part where I generate the map is already done. I want to do the part where the character chooses if he heals, flee or attack depending on various situation so I thought RL was good for this.