Recent comments in /f/LifeProTips
Omegaman11235 t1_j1angnd wrote
Reply to LPT: If you are gifting a gaming system for Xmas, turn it on and connect it to the internet before you give it out. This way all the updates are downloaded and installed on the day the gift is opened. by koopabomb
This is great for younger kids or people who are unsure of the set up process. For the "gamer" in your life plase let them set it up. It's part of the process and allows you to begin to understand your new system. For me personally, I love this part. All the logging in an the new sounds and notification noises. It's enjoyable.
Normalizesteroidz t1_j1anaar wrote
Reply to comment by Bertthesnurt in LPT: If you are gifting a gaming system for Xmas, turn it on and connect it to the internet before you give it out. This way all the updates are downloaded and installed on the day the gift is opened. by koopabomb
Yeah please don't open my gift.
bigedcactushead t1_j1an7n0 wrote
Reply to LPT: Don't spy on your SO to try to catch them cheating. If you can't trust them, just break up. by 5YOChemist
Lame. Are you seriously going to divorce your spouse on a hunch?
Bertthesnurt t1_j1an5ig wrote
Reply to LPT: If you are gifting a gaming system for Xmas, turn it on and connect it to the internet before you give it out. This way all the updates are downloaded and installed on the day the gift is opened. by koopabomb
Nope
Gotta have that first time unboxing experience
keepthetips t1_j1ams3c wrote
Reply to LPT: If you are gifting a gaming system for Xmas, turn it on and connect it to the internet before you give it out. This way all the updates are downloaded and installed on the day the gift is opened. by koopabomb
Hello and welcome to r/LifeProTips!
Please help us decide if this post is a good fit for the subreddit by up or downvoting this comment.
If you think that this is great advice to improve your life, please upvote. If you think this doesn't help you in any way, please downvote. If you don't care, leave it for the others to decide.
GreyMediaGuy t1_j1am39k wrote
Reply to LPT: Don't spy on your SO to try to catch them cheating. If you can't trust them, just break up. by 5YOChemist
And stay off their phones. No one above 12 does that.
Devittraisedto2 t1_j1alrrd wrote
Reply to comment by anotheralpaca69 in LPT: just because an injury is described as "non life-threatening," doesn't mean that it isn't life changing. Someone could be paralyzed from the waist down and that would still be considered non life-threatening by [deleted]
Not much considering it has little to no practicality. It's not integral that we know it anyway.
OP throwing a tantrum now because I inquired too much on how this should affect me and others.
[deleted] OP t1_j1alkl3 wrote
Devittraisedto2 t1_j1al5tq wrote
Reply to comment by swheedle in LPT: just because an injury is described as "non life-threatening," doesn't mean that it isn't life changing. Someone could be paralyzed from the waist down and that would still be considered non life-threatening by [deleted]
"Useful" information to you is trivial to the rest because of how impractical it is to most people's lives. Im asking you the practicality of it and here you are being pissy because you don't have an actual answer on how this can be applied to daily life.
My apologies for inquiring too much on how this could benefit me, since it seems it doesn't benefit most people at all outside of "mayhaps there be a life changing injury on site of the non-life threatening incident"
True, the distinction is there, but it doesn't change anything much except for the people affected by it.
swheedle t1_j1akvq1 wrote
Reply to comment by Devittraisedto2 in LPT: just because an injury is described as "non life-threatening," doesn't mean that it isn't life changing. Someone could be paralyzed from the waist down and that would still be considered non life-threatening by [deleted]
Dude you are not the gate keeper of useful information, go touch some grass and stop sorting by new to shoot down posts people think up
Devittraisedto2 t1_j1akl3w wrote
Reply to comment by swheedle in LPT: just because an injury is described as "non life-threatening," doesn't mean that it isn't life changing. Someone could be paralyzed from the waist down and that would still be considered non life-threatening by [deleted]
And how does that impact the person?
"Oh there were non-life threatening injuries", I doubt most people who aren't involved in the incident would go "but were there any life changing injuries?"
swheedle t1_j1akbop wrote
Reply to comment by Devittraisedto2 in LPT: just because an injury is described as "non life-threatening," doesn't mean that it isn't life changing. Someone could be paralyzed from the waist down and that would still be considered non life-threatening by [deleted]
People who weren't aware of this distinction can use this information to become better informed when presented with a story thusly phrased
Devittraisedto2 t1_j1ak5y2 wrote
Reply to comment by swheedle in LPT: just because an injury is described as "non life-threatening," doesn't mean that it isn't life changing. Someone could be paralyzed from the waist down and that would still be considered non life-threatening by [deleted]
It doesn't really answer the question of what's the practicality of it to be a life pro tip
Pretty sure you can piece together that severity of the incident, and use multiple news outlets to see how severe it really is.
midgethepuff t1_j1ajzu7 wrote
Reply to LPT: Don't spy on your SO to try to catch them cheating. If you can't trust them, just break up. by 5YOChemist
I’d like to encourage anyone who wants to put surveillance on their partner that they suspect of cheating to listen to the podcast Bad Bad Thing. It’s only 6 episodes.
diaretical t1_j1aix92 wrote
Reply to LPT: Don't spy on your SO to try to catch them cheating. If you can't trust them, just break up. by 5YOChemist
Story time! I got lucky and made a ton of money off the market a couple years ago. Decided to finally leave my abusive significant other. She started putting a tile tracker in my car to try to spy on my location to make a case that I was cheating on her to scare me into giving her as much money from my retirement/investment portfolio as possible (even though we were only together for 15 months, had no kids). Moral of the story - if your ex starts accusing you of being somewhere at a certain time and you have no idea how she might know, it’s time to shut your mouth, get a restraining order, and let the lawyers duke it out. Nothing good came from trying to convince her of anything other than the scenario she had already created in her head. Left her 2 years ago and I’ve never been happier.
CoffeyNut t1_j1aiw1r wrote
Reply to LPT: Don't spy on your SO to try to catch them cheating. If you can't trust them, just break up. by 5YOChemist
My ex husband was sneaky. I’d find hidden alcohol and drugs, online romances, etc. It made me nervous all the time. I couldn’t just walk into a room he was in, use a shared computer, or even put laundry away without finding the next cause to feel hurt. I still had those nervous habits when I first met my current husband. We talked about it and he encouraged me to make every effort to raid his privacy. In the 16 years we’ve been married, I’ve never once uncovered deception. If I ever walked in on him bumping uglies with someone else, I’d sooner believe that he tripped and fell in! My advice: when someone tells you who they are by words or actions, believe it.
fishling t1_j1aiapy wrote
Reply to comment by dpdxguy in LPT: Don't spy on your SO to try to catch them cheating. If you can't trust them, just break up. by 5YOChemist
I thought that on my initial read as well, but when I noticed the gap and read some of their other replies, I saw the original post differently.
It's possible to have "suspicions" without losing trust, and for those suspicions to have reasonable and true explanations due to miscommunications and differences in perception. Advising people to break up because of suspicions alone is terrible advice. Note that there is a lot of ambiguity here in how we all interpret "suspicions" as well, which means not everyone is necessarily talking about the same sort of thing.
swheedle t1_j1ai7xi wrote
Reply to LPT: just because an injury is described as "non life-threatening," doesn't mean that it isn't life changing. Someone could be paralyzed from the waist down and that would still be considered non life-threatening by [deleted]
I decided to add something like this comment to the post instead for increased visibility, disregard the below content.
Some clarity:
When disasters happen the news will say things like "there were no fatalities and only three injuries, and the injuries were described as non life-threatening." Those injuries may well still be horrific, but the news will often phrase it like that to soften the scale of the event.
[deleted] t1_j1ahtb1 wrote
Reply to comment by Tyalou in LPT: Don't spy on your SO to try to catch them cheating. If you can't trust them, just break up. by 5YOChemist
[deleted]
Effective_Pie1312 t1_j1ahcmm wrote
Reply to LPT: Don't spy on your SO to try to catch them cheating. If you can't trust them, just break up. by 5YOChemist
Spying on partner or demanding a second by second replay of the day is like putting spouse on a performance improvement plan (PIP). The trust is broken. Really the only purpose is for either is documentation to justify going your separate ways. It can happen but rarely does anyone improve under scrutiny of such actions and moral for all goes downhill.
anotheralpaca69 t1_j1aha2h wrote
Reply to LPT: just because an injury is described as "non life-threatening," doesn't mean that it isn't life changing. Someone could be paralyzed from the waist down and that would still be considered non life-threatening by [deleted]
What the fuck does OP expect us to do with this information?
fishling t1_j1ah9a4 wrote
Reply to comment by SlowRolla in LPT: Don't spy on your SO to try to catch them cheating. If you can't trust them, just break up. by 5YOChemist
That's not what I said though.
Of course, no one is under any obligation to stay with anyone else, ever.
But, for a cheater to be the one that breaks the trust, and then say "if you don't trust me, you should break up with me instead of spying on me trying to discover the truth", then that's manipulative. The cheater, in that scenario, wants the best of everything: the benefits of infidelity, not getting challenged or being proved to be a cheater, and not having to initiate the breakup themselves, so they can reap the benefits of both relationships as long as possible.
[deleted] t1_j1ah74b wrote
Reply to comment by SlowRolla in LPT: Don't spy on your SO to try to catch them cheating. If you can't trust them, just break up. by 5YOChemist
[deleted]
FENTWAY t1_j1anplo wrote
Reply to LPT: If you are gifting a gaming system for Xmas, turn it on and connect it to the internet before you give it out. This way all the updates are downloaded and installed on the day the gift is opened. by koopabomb
Although id appreciate the effort, i think id be a lil upset i didnt get to crack the seal