Recent comments in /f/InternetIsBeautiful

Terkala t1_ir35zmh wrote

Sites like this get shared among super liberal places like reddit. But can you imagine grandmothers on Facebook using it? No.

So you get skewed distributions of things. It only represents those people that take the survey, and by the nature of the site those people will all strongly think the same.

Also the questions aren't useful. Should abortion be legal? Simply a yes/no doesn't give any meaningful information. The debate is basically down to 'if it should be legal, when should it be legal'. The current left wing stance is that it should be legal up to 1second before labor happens. The right wing stance is 'sometimes legal, often before heartbeat'.

But according to that poll site everyone supports abortion.

−4

DoesHeSmellikeaBitch t1_ir2rn0f wrote

I believe the concern is that the sample of respondents is not random, and indeed, not really representative of any particular population. Thus, the data reflects the bias not of the population of that specific area alone but also the channels via which this program is disseminated.

71

black_rose_ t1_ir2qyg9 wrote

Don't worry... there has to be a person operating/optimizing/continuously developing the ai

People shouldn't fear ai. It's just a new kind of tool. The right tool for the job. AI expertise is a resume item now like Photoshop or CAD. And there's a rich ecosystem because many competitors are creating unique models - Midjourney, crAIyon just being the first of many for eg graphic design. People fear the change of new technologies, like weaving looms caused a huge upset, but if you position yourself for the direction of the field you'll do well. Find the school program with the most specialty in integrated interior design and cutting edge software.

Source: I work in a tech niche that had an AI upset/gamechanger a year ago. People freaked at first but now it's just a (very helpful due to SPEED) step integrated into the existing product development pathway and everyone is finding it feasible to make their own version of the initial proprietary model. Some people code the AI but many more apply it. And I've heard from building architects that there's always a lot of money in interior design

3

tyrion85 t1_ir2pasy wrote

yeah, as others have said, don't be discouraged! 🙏 in my mind, the point of creative jobs or art in general is the portrayal of human emotion and creativity. on a very broad level, it is a way for humans to connect with each other. no AI will ever replace a human art - at least as far as I'm concerned - because a piece of art for me is the expression of another human being. I don't care very much about a physical object, I care about the person that made it.

2