Recent comments in /f/IAmA

orderofstandrew OP t1_izzgabh wrote

Great question! I actually began writing a Trump mystery in early 2016, back when Trump was a primary candidate with little chance of winning the Republican nomination. 'The Day of the Donald' was a satirical thriller about a (then) hypothetical future where a reality TV host becomes president. By the time I finished and published it that summer, Trump was the nominee...thus killing the market. The book sold less than a thousand copies and faded from memory. I learned an important lesson: if you write satire, you run the risk of real life being more bizarre than fiction.

10

AutoModerator t1_izzdzbx wrote

Users, please be wary of proof. You are welcome to ask for more proof if you find it insufficient.

OP, if you need any help, please message the mods here.

Thank you!


I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

vAltyR47 t1_izz0ipa wrote

I think the most elegant way to achieve this is to simply shift the current property tax to fall on land value, rather than land value + building value. That way, people's tax bills don't go up when they improve their house or build on their land. Most people who actually live on that land would see an overall decrease in tax bills because most of their property value (the building) no longer gets taxed, but empty lots and lots with condemned or run-down buildings see their bill go up significantly, forcing them to sell to someone who's actually going to do something with the property.

Combine this with zoning and permitting reform to lower construction costs, and I think that will help the situation a lot.

1

TerryScarchuk t1_izyq1j5 wrote

To add to that, while incentivizing supply increases we should also look to protect the developers from another future crash. Last time around tens of thousands of small to medium sized builders were financially ruined and left the industry entirely because they were left holding the bag on entirely too much inventory. That’s a big part of why the houses we need today don’t exist and likely won’t be built for another 5-10 years. I’m not saying a “too big to fail” type bailout, but a federal housing insurance program that builders can buy into and have a rescue net to sell inventory into. This could help create a diverse section 8 housing pool while keeping builders afloat.

11