Recent comments in /f/GetMotivated

xAUSxReap3r t1_j681jme wrote

This doesn't work in practice.

The apartment I'm renting no longer has running water? I won't complain to my landlord to get it fixed, I'll just be grateful that I was able to experience water.

The tradesperson I paid to complete a job left the work unfinished? I won't complain to them/their company and just be grateful I was able to hire someone to take my money.

I've been sexually harassed? I won't complain to management/authorities, I'll show gratitude that I received attention.

33

svedge_weed OP t1_j67q4zt wrote

Brother! It feels like you read my mind to write thisšŸ˜‚ did you watch "The Tenant" fron Polanski? It really explains well what you said about not being a phisical creature. Yeah i get what you mean, the God you talk about is like Socrate's demon, isn't it? Thank you for answering

2

notyurmamma t1_j678qf5 wrote

I believe that the overriding consensus is that we are not leaving earth better than we found it. Pollution from plastics and micro-plastics, carbon emissions, chemical irritants, all man-made substances, invading our air, soil, and water…depleting our ecosystems. This impetus, this ā€œprogression,ā€ at times foolhardy..this deterioration…driven by ego and greed and childish vanity…are we that much better off? Are we closer to a sustainable planet? A sustainable economy? A sustainable life? Not really. I think that is the point of this entire conversation. People sought out spices and decimated native cultures. People sought out other territories and eventually fought for control. Would war even be an issue if not for greed? If not for control and leverage and ā€œfurtheringā€ one’s position? There is a tipping point. At which point do you trade happiness in the sake of ā€œprogression?ā€ I don’t particularly know, but I feel like on the whole, we have surpassed it.

3

HomoVulgaris t1_j673dnv wrote

Honest answer: The truth is that nobody could have predicted the impact of satellite technology. So the researchers of the 1950s couldn't get to satellite technology directly: they had no idea it existed. The only way to discover it was to shoot for the moon. They strove towards a goal which, in retrospect, was foolhardy: the exploration of an interstellar hunk of rock with nothing particularly noteworthy on its surface. However, it was this goal, as well as the equally foolhardy and impossible goal of "stop communism" that provided the impetus for the discovery of much of the technology of the information age.

You'll recall that the explorers of North America had similar foolhardy goals about spice islands and cities of gold. The medieval alchemists who invented modern chemistry did so with the stated goal of discovering the elixir of life, the cure-all, and the philosopher's stone. On the one hand, what childish vanities these ancients tried to obtain! On the other hand, what wonders they discovered in the process!

The man in the chair definitely isn't denying himself anything! We agree. He is denying, however, something that he owes to humanity: leaving this planet Earth better than you found it.

0

amadmongoose t1_j66suxz wrote

I'm annoyed that a quote from a book whose entire message is anti-consumerist and anti-capitalist, that more or less had the point that unless we care and do something about it we'll live in a polluted ruined dystopia world, is being used to advertise selling fries...

8

Anthony_Delafino OP t1_j66m0b2 wrote

Ah, I see you know the city's motto.

But, yes. I am hoping for a weekend trip down to the bay to see some friends, but money. Hopefully I will be able to get somewhere, but I am trying not to count on it so I don't disappoint myself. I am definitely going to be doing morning walks, though, thats for sure.

1