Recent comments in /f/Futurology
femmestem t1_jd8j864 wrote
Reply to comment by JefferyTheQuaxly in Have your cake and print it: the 3D culinary revolution is coming by TurretLauncher
Imagine mixing up ingredients and getting a meat cake
femmestem t1_jd8j313 wrote
Reply to comment by theguineapigssong in Have your cake and print it: the 3D culinary revolution is coming by TurretLauncher
Sucking at something is the first step in becoming kinda good at it.
Surur t1_jd8j2nb wrote
Reply to comment by CrelbowMannschaft in Endgame for f****** society! by tiopepe002
> Why would they value human life to the detriment all other species?
Because we made them?
[deleted] t1_jd8hgz9 wrote
DrIngSpaceCowboy t1_jd8h00w wrote
Reply to Endgame for f****** society! by tiopepe002
Garbage in garbage out. As an engineer I have watched computer programs try to design things. There are so many mistakes that I am confident AI will not be taking over.
elehman839 t1_jd8gnav wrote
Reply to Persuasive piece by Robert Wright. Worrying about the rapid advancement of AI no longer makes you a kook. by OpenlyFallible
To me, "AI turns evil" scenarios seem a ways out. The more-probable scenario in the near term that concerns me is nasty PEOPLE repurposing AI to nasty ends. There are vile people who make malware and ransomware. There are people who've lived wretched lives, are angry about that, and just want to inflict damage wherever they can. These folks may make up 0.001% of the population, but that's still a lot of people worldwide.
So how are these folks going to use AI to cause as much damage as possible? If they had control of an AI, they could give it the darkest possible intentions. Maybe something like, "befriend people online and over a period of months then gradually start undermining their sense of self worth and encourage them to commit suicide". Or "relentlessly make calm, rational-sounding arguments in many online forums under many identities that <some population group> is evil and should be killed".
As long as AI is super compute-intensive, there will be check on this behavior. If you're running on BigCorp's cloud service, they can terminate your service. But when decent AI can run on personally-owned hardware, I think we're almost certain to see horrific stuff like this. This may not end the world, but it will be quite unpleasant.
ty1771 t1_jd8gmh7 wrote
Reply to Persuasive piece by Robert Wright. Worrying about the rapid advancement of AI no longer makes you a kook. by OpenlyFallible
Who will write all the AI think pieces if AI writes them all?
Tnuvu t1_jd8gdqe wrote
Reply to Endgame for f****** society! by tiopepe002
Elysium copycat, and wef and the other snobs are making it for some years already
DisasterousGiraffe OP t1_jd8foqu wrote
Reply to comment by Gammelpreiss in IPCC chart says Solar PV and Wind Turbines are best way to achieve Deep, Rapid, and Low Cost emission cuts before 2030. by DisasterousGiraffe
The nuclear crowd are likely just part of the disinformation campaign: Investigating climate sceptics’ disinformation strategy on Twitter, by Sebastián Escalón
Jernau-Morat-Gurgeh t1_jd8farb wrote
Reply to comment by __The__Anomaly__ in Endgame for f****** society! by tiopepe002
I came here to suggest this. It also hints at some of the more dystopian aspects of a post-scarcity society and how manipulative it may actually be.
Still would be my preferred sci-fi civilisation to live in of all that have been written or put to film.
Then move onto Excession for a view on what AI politics could look like.
cjeam t1_jd8do99 wrote
Reply to comment by Fryceratops in Have your cake and print it: the 3D culinary revolution is coming by TurretLauncher
Yes it is. There is no reason to arbitrarily claim that only dairy products can be cheese. Anything cheese-like is cheese.
hoopermanish t1_jd8dmn1 wrote
Reply to comment by wrongwestern in Have your cake and print it: the 3D culinary revolution is coming by TurretLauncher
“Upheave it” might be more accurate?
Zoidbergslicense t1_jd8dlh7 wrote
Reply to Endgame for f****** society! by tiopepe002
I think the endgame will be when AI and tech take us to the point where none of us need to work. The make or break point will be if the wealthy collect all the benefit of this. I really believe we have the tech and knowledge currently to build a world where no one has to suffer. But human nature is preventing that and will probably prevent it forever.
FuturologyBot t1_jd8djbb wrote
Reply to Huawei Spent Almost $24 Billion on R&D in 2023 to Deal With US Tech Sanctions, Founder Says by tomato-is-vegetable
The following submission statement was provided by /u/tomato-is-vegetable:
This has got plusses and minuses. It's good to see more money poured in to AI development, but in this case it was because of sanctions, and the world economy becoming split is detrimental to ordinary people. The sanctions may cause money to be wasted on redundant R&D that reduplicates effort elsewhere. Still, I bet Huawei made some great progress with their $24 billion.
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/11yman6/huawei_spent_almost_24_billion_on_rd_in_2023_to/jd88nxf/
DisasterousGiraffe OP t1_jd8deu4 wrote
Reply to comment by ILikeNeurons in IPCC chart says Solar PV and Wind Turbines are best way to achieve Deep, Rapid, and Low Cost emission cuts before 2030. by DisasterousGiraffe
The MIT graphs look plain wrong. For example, the left-hand graph for heavily subsidize renewables shows coal, oil and gas as primary energy sources effectively flat or slightly increasing out to 2100. The current growth of solar and wind is already reducing fossil fuels in major areas, for example in the US for electricity generation, this will accelerate as solar becomes cheaper.
Fryceratops t1_jd8dcm2 wrote
Reply to comment by cjeam in Have your cake and print it: the 3D culinary revolution is coming by TurretLauncher
Cheese by definition is not vegan just like milk isn't vegan. We really need to get aggressive with food labelling in this regard.
There's nothing wrong with a vegan diet but there is something wrong with misrepresenting what things are. Cheese is a dairy product. Plant milk is just juice under a different name.
cjeam t1_jd8ci91 wrote
Reply to comment by Fryceratops in Have your cake and print it: the 3D culinary revolution is coming by TurretLauncher
Yes it is, it’s vegan cheese, made from some sort of vegan milk. It’s not dairy cheese made from dairy milk.
Iffykindofguy t1_jd8c0ed wrote
Reply to Endgame for f****** society! by tiopepe002
Let go of capitalism. You seem to be defining your life by your position in the market. Life existed before capitalism, itll exist after.
mupimak t1_jd8b3pf wrote
Reply to comment by wesap12345 in Homes for alien life? Two moons of Uranus ‘may harbour active oceans’ by mancinedinburgh
"The alien bug infested water is actually better for you than the earth water"
duckduckohno t1_jd8arj5 wrote
Reply to Mobile Nanogrids Can Provide Electricity, Clean Water During a Disaster. A single Nanogrid from Sesame Solar can power up to six homes. by Sariel007
FTA; the system is capable of producing 20 kW? The image in the article has 20 panels? I'm not aware of any 1kW panels on the market. 400W is pretty typical.
I wonder if there are battery packs that can supplement peak solar power and that's where they're getting that 20kW number
[deleted] t1_jd8ankh wrote
Reply to comment by Bierculles in Persuasive piece by Robert Wright. Worrying about the rapid advancement of AI no longer makes you a kook. by OpenlyFallible
[removed]
user_dan t1_jd8ak9b wrote
Reply to Endgame for f****** society! by tiopepe002
I get that there are people out there that wrap their entire identities around work. It is so ingrained in their personalities that they cannot even day dream of a world with no work.
There are other groups of people out there where work is already completely meaningless. These people only do work so they can support themselves and their families. If they had another choice, they would not be working. They would be taking care of their kids, pursuing hobbies, traveling, engaging with communities and otherwise experiencing life.
The answer to your question is super simple or so complex the most advanced AI could never figure out.
Gammelpreiss t1_jd8abxa wrote
Reply to comment by urmomaisjabbathehutt in IPCC chart says Solar PV and Wind Turbines are best way to achieve Deep, Rapid, and Low Cost emission cuts before 2030. by DisasterousGiraffe
Don't bother. The nuclear crowd has become a dogmatic cult by now. It is like discussing with religious nutjobs
noxav t1_jd8a32o wrote
Reply to comment by Bierculles in Persuasive piece by Robert Wright. Worrying about the rapid advancement of AI no longer makes you a kook. by OpenlyFallible
You clearly didn't need it in order to detect sarcasm.
Better_Call_Salsa t1_jd8jdl7 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Persuasive piece by Robert Wright. Worrying about the rapid advancement of AI no longer makes you a kook. by OpenlyFallible
Thank God the "nanobots inside your body controlled by AI radio waves" is 100% not possible kookiness... right?