Recent comments in /f/Futurology
Cawdor t1_jctyeos wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Anticancer Activity of Bee Venom Components against Breast Cancer by Exciting-Phrase-684
Just call it Holistic treatment and you’ll have dummies lining up and paying a premium to do it
Genspirit t1_jcty9v5 wrote
Reply to comment by Yearofthehoneybadger in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
I was thinking between chat gpt and midjourney you could make a really good system to assist with creating a campaign and even add some visuals.
vikirosen t1_jcty85l wrote
Reply to comment by allrollingwolf in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
Briefs for ads are sensitive information. You wouldn't want a competitor to steal your ad idea, would you?
jvin248 t1_jctxv0h wrote
Reply to comment by earth2jason in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
+1 Marketing Gimmick.
There are the German Beer Purity Standards of the 1500s to maintain.
They might do something mundane like "convert my five gallon hobby batch recipe measured in volumes to a twenty barrel recipe measured by weights" that would be useful ... and marketable!
coffeeinvenice t1_jctxsgz wrote
Reply to comment by Shmogt in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
No I copy and paste blocks of text. Sometimes the first iteration is...not quite what I want it to be, so there is an 'answer again' option and that often gives a better result a second time.
I'm not 100% clear in my mind yet whether I am using ChatGPT to paraphrase a news article, or to plagiarize it. For my purposes the vocabulary and grammar of most native-English news stories is too advanced for ESL learners, so ChatGPT helps me to do something faster that I normally do anyway.
tighterfit t1_jctxng0 wrote
Another theoretical weapon from the communist machine. Not ready to deploy yet, logistical hurdles. More like we have a theory, now we need to try and build it.
Competitive-Ask5659 t1_jctxc1p wrote
Reply to We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
I use it to prep for meetings. Example: explain how California regulates managed care heal plans…
It was only good for super basic Wikipedia level intro stuff.
oldcreaker t1_jctx04f wrote
Reply to We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
Give it time - once upon a time I was typing html into a text editor back when Microsoft was still calling the internet "stupid". That changed very quickly. Look at it now.
jvin248 t1_jctwy55 wrote
Reply to comment by MrKahnberg in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
I am sure there is someone at the FAA using the AI to evaluate the slew of documents manufacturers send in. .... "Chat says everything is ok, you're good to go!".
Especially since Chat will not be flying on those machines itself.
cocoadusted t1_jctwobg wrote
Reply to We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
Made a whole employee handbook, best practices etc. An aid to my business more than anything.
Fearless-Bet780 t1_jctwgbh wrote
Reply to comment by eratonnn in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
It’s answers were quick and gave me different ideas than my own late at night. And it was sort of insightful that the way I differed my questions gave me different results - substantively. That was a learning for me that seems obvious now.
allrollingwolf t1_jctw95x wrote
Reply to comment by vikirosen in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
Don’t worry, they will definitely follow all the rules and tell the client everything! Especially for public facing advertisements that no doubt contain very sensitive and super secret information this is very important.
[deleted] t1_jctvj8g wrote
[removed]
Puzzleheaded_Phase98 t1_jctus8n wrote
Reply to comment by jusdisgi in IVO Ltd. to Launch Quantum Drive Pure Electric Satellite Thruster into Orbit on SpaceX Transporter 8 with partner Rogue Space Systems by ComfortableIntern218
I understand you believe that but he has had his peer reviewed and already published papers blocked by arXiv for example and stuff like so I don't think good faith applies here at all.
vikirosen t1_jctuioj wrote
Reply to comment by moodRubicund in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
I hope your client is aware of this and that you checked with your managers that it's an allowed way to use the client's data. In the EU this would be a huge problem.
eratonnn OP t1_jcttzqa wrote
Reply to comment by moodRubicund in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
This is funny and makes sense. AI will maybe be a perfect solution for people who are only comfortable with new representations of things they're already totally familiar with. Ie a 'new Picasso'
eratonnn OP t1_jcttt2l wrote
Reply to comment by Evipicc in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
Could you elaborate on DnD campaigns? How do you use it? Like to do the idea for the campaign, or the progress, or what?
eratonnn OP t1_jcttglh wrote
Reply to comment by Fearless-Bet780 in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
Well, it's a result based on that lieu, anyway. Which is part of one of the concerns of 'replacing' scholarly workers. That without a continuing body of reliable data, AI will not be able to progress.
I've used it for some similar types of questions. It's good at finding more or less something applicable to what I'm looking for (in legal questions, history, etc). But it seems it's just grabbing what I could find otherwise on Wikipedia and research papers, and making it so I don't have to read through everything to find it. And for giving colored responses that we can interpret. I haven't really been impressed by anything it's said though, the way I am when I listen to a real expert in the subject, and rather it's just good at presenting encyclopedic/textbook info. Have you?
PublishDateBot t1_jcttgfz wrote
This article was originally published 9 months ago and may contain out of date information.
The original publication date was July 1st, 2022. Per rule 13 older content is allowed as long as [month, year] is included in the title.
^(This bot finds outdated articles. It's impossible to be 100% accurate on every site, send me a message if you notice an error or would like this bot added to your subreddit. You can also download my) ^(Chrome Extension) ^(if you'd like to see publish dates added to all article links on reddit.)
^(Send Feedback) ^(|) ^(Github - Bot) ^(|) ^(Github - Chrome Extension)
Am_Seeker_731 t1_jctt3y6 wrote
Reply to We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
It's saved me time at work if I need to get started on a project plan. It can give me bullet points in what's most important, ideas for best practice strategy and saves a lot of time writing. Used it as a springboard for a job req as well.
M4err0w t1_jctsz5u wrote
well thank god they shared how it works so everyone can be on the same page.
eratonnn OP t1_jctshpd wrote
Reply to comment by KnifeFightAcademy in We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
Do you mark this down to the low quality of that worker? or would it be that even good producers would be less competent than ChatGPT?
polat32 t1_jctsedx wrote
Reply to We've had public access to ChatGPT for 3 months now. Has anyone made any actual profitable business or quality thing with it? by eratonnn
It's gelping me a lot with school. Not really answering your qeustion. But it really saves time.
FuturologyBot t1_jctscor wrote
The following submission statement was provided by /u/Exciting-Phrase-684:
Venom from honey bees were found to have a damaging effect on breast cancer cells, leaving normal cells undamaged.
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/11vmfed/anticancer_activity_of_bee_venom_components/jcto4ty/
ItsAConspiracy t1_jctyfgi wrote
Reply to comment by BranchLatter4294 in Rolls-Royce go-ahead to build a nuclear reactor on Moon - Scientists and engineers are working on the micro-reactor programme that will help humans to live and work on Earth's natural satellite by Gari_305
If each of those EV batteries is a 100 kilowatt-hour Tesla battery, and your lunar base uses just one kilowatt like an average American house, then sure, three batteries will last for (almost) two weeks since there are 336 hours in two weeks.
But Rolls-Royce is talking about a reactor that can provide megawatts. If we need a megawatt of power instead of a kilowatt, then we multiply our battery requirement by a factor of a thousand.